Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas | |
O problema do ativismo judicial: uma análise do caso MS3326 | |
Adriano Obach Lepper1  Lenio Luiz Streck3  Clarissa Tassinari2  | |
[1] Graduando em Direito pela UNISINOS.;Doutoranda em direito público pelo PPG Direito da UNISINOS.;PPG Direito (UNISINOS) | |
关键词: Ativismo judicial; Judicialização da política; Decisão judicial; Democracia; Papel do Judiciário; | |
DOI : | |
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合) | |
来源: Centro Universitario de Brasilia | |
【 摘 要 】
The distinction between judicial activism and judicialization of politics, which is built on the theoretical framework of Critical Hermeneutics of the Law (by Lenio Streck). The hermeneutic phenomenology was employed as methodology. This approach can be understood as a critical review of the central legal tradition themes. In conclusion, it will be explained why the decision in this case may be considered activist, establishing an analysis of risks presented for democracy due to legal activism. In this sense, this paper is original, because it starts on a theoretical hypothesis (the difference between judicial activism and judicialization of politics) and makes it applicable to a particular case. Furthermore, this paper brings contributions to legal studies, since it explains how democracy is jeopardized when the judiciary act beyond legal limits.
【 授权许可】
Unknown
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO201911300149333ZK.pdf | 1397KB | download |