COMPARISON OF POINT CLOUD REGISTRATION ALGORITHMS FOR BETTER RESULT ASSESSMENT – TOWARDS AN OPEN-SOURCE SOLUTION

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences

Lachat, E.^1¹ 

[1] Photogrammetry and Geomatics Group, ICube Laboratory UMR 7357, INSA Strasbourg, France^1

关键词: Registration;    Point clouds;    Comparison;    Evaluation;    Open-source;    Laser scanning;    Quality criteria;   

DOI  :  10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-551-2018

学科分类：地球科学(综合)

来源: Copernicus Publications

【 摘 要 】

Terrestrial and airborne laser scanning, photogrammetry and more generally 3D recording techniques are used in a wide range of applications. After recording several individual 3D datasets known in local systems, one of the first crucial processing steps is the registration of these data into a common reference frame. To perform such a 3D transformation, commercial and open source software as well as programs from the academic community are available. Due to some lacks in terms of computation transparency and quality assessment in these solutions, it has been decided to develop an open source algorithm which is presented in this paper. It is dedicated to the simultaneous registration of multiple point clouds as well as their georeferencing. The idea is to use this algorithm as a start point for further implementations, involving the possibility of combining 3D data from different sources. Parallel to the presentation of the global registration methodology which has been employed, the aim of this paper is to confront the results achieved this way with the above-mentioned existing solutions. For this purpose, first results obtained with the proposed algorithm to perform the global registration of ten laser scanning point clouds are presented. An analysis of the quality criteria delivered by two selected software used in this study and a reflexion about these criteria is also performed to complete the comparison of the obtained results. The final aim of this paper is to validate the current efficiency of the proposed method through these comparisons.

【 授权许可】

CC BY