期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering
VFR-into-IMC: An Analysis of Two Training Protocols on Weather-Related Posttest Scores
Carney, Thomas1  Price, Matt1  Xie, Allen1  Major, Wesley1  Keller, Julius C1 
[1] Purdue University
关键词: VFR-into-IMC;    general aviation;    weather;    aeronautical;    decision-making;    pilot training;   
DOI  :  10.7771/2159-6670.1150
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合)
来源: Purdue University
PDF
【 摘 要 】

According to the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association Air Safety Institute, 264 accidents were identified as continued visual flight rules (VFR) into instrument meteorological conditions (IMC), during the past ten years. Approximately 89% of those VFR-into-IMC accidents were fatal, causing hundreds of deaths. VFR-into-IMC has been a major concern for the general aviation community, prompting focused efforts. Research, data analyses, outreach, training, and education are recommended practices to address risks associated with VFR-into-IMC. Researchers of the current study sought to evaluate the cause and effect relationship between two training protocols and weather-related posttest scores. A pretest–posttest experimental design was utilized at two testing locations. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a control group, an interactive online training group, or an interactive workshop group. An analysis of covariance was used to determine whether there was a significant difference between mean posttest scores among the experimental groups while controlling for pretest scores. The treatments did not appear to significantly increase posttest scores after controlling for pretest scores, at either experiment location. Though the results of this study did not yield anticipated findings, much was learned and potentially helpful to general aviation researchers seeking to mitigate VFR-into-IMC encounters. Recommendations for future research and practices are discussed.

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201910255685226ZK.pdf 1420KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:16次 浏览次数:18次