Comparison between low-cost and traditional MEMS accelerometers: a case study from the M7.1 Darfield, New Zealand, aftershock deployment

Annals Of Geophysics

Anna Kaiser¹  Bill Fry¹  Angela Chung²  Jesse F. Lawrence³  Elizabeth S. Cochran⁴ 

[1] GNS Science, Natural Hazards Division, Lower Hutt,;Stanford Un;Stanford University, Geophysics Department, Stanford, CA,;University of California, Riverside* Now at:US Geological Survey, Pasadena, CA,

关键词: Seismology Instruments and techniques;    Ground Motion;    Seismic Risk;    Seismological Data;    Citizen Science;   

DOI  :  10.4401/ag-5268

学科分类：地球化学与岩石

来源: Istituto Nazionale Di Geofisica E Vulcanologia

【 摘 要 】

Recent advances in micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) sensing and distributed computing techniques have enabled the development of low-cost, rapidly deployed dense seismic networks. The Quake-Catcher Network (QCN) uses triaxial MEMS accelerometers in

【 授权许可】

CC BY