期刊论文详细信息
PLoS One
PAI-1 -675 4G/5G Polymorphism in Association with Diabetes and Diabetic Complications Susceptibility: a Meta-Analysis Study
Wei Tang1  Dai Cui2  Yun Shi2  Tao Yang2  Kuanfeng Xu2  Fan Yang2  Xiaoyun Liu2  Chong Shen3 
[1] Department of Endocrinology, Jiangyin People’s Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China;Department of Endocrinology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China;Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
关键词: Diabetes mellitus;    Meta-analysis;    Coronary heart disease;    Type 2 diabetes;    Publication ethics;    Ethnicities;    Genetic polymorphism;    Variant genotypes;   
DOI  :  10.1371/journal.pone.0079150
学科分类:医学(综合)
来源: Public Library of Science
PDF
【 摘 要 】

A meta-analysis was performed to assess the association between the PAI-1 -675 4G/5G polymorphism and susceptibility to diabetes mellitus (DM), diabetic nephropathy (DN), diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic coronary artery disease (CAD). A literature-based search was conducted to identify all relevant studies. The fixed or random effect pooled measure was calculated mainly at the allele level to determine heterogeneity bias among studies. Further stratified analyses and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Publication bias was examined by the modified Begg’s and Egger’s test. Twenty published articles with twenty-seven outcomes were included in the meta-analysis: 6 studies with a total of 1,333 cases and 3,011 controls were analyzed for the PAI-1 -675 4G/5G polymorphism with diabetes risk, 7 studies with 1,060 cases and 1,139 controls for DN risk, 10 studies with 1,327 cases and 1,557 controls for DR and 4 studies with 610 cases and 1,042 controls for diabetic CAD risk respectively. Using allelic comparison (4G vs. 5G), the PAI-1 -675 4G/5G polymorphism was observed to have no significant association with diabetes (REM OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.96, 1.20), DN (REM OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.98, 1.25), DR (REM OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.97, 1.22) or diabetic CAD risk (REM OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.81, 1.42), and similar results were obtained in the dominant, recessive and co-dominant models. Our meta-analyses suggest that the PAI-1 -675 4G/5G polymorphism might not be a risk factor for DM, DN, DR or diabetic CAD risk in the populations investigated. This conclusion warrants confirmation by further studies.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201904025346038ZK.pdf 864KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:11次