Collabra: Psychology | |
The Effect of Reading a Short Passage of Literary Fiction on Theory of Mind: A Replication of Kidd and Castano (2013) | |
Iris van Kuijk1  Rolf A. Zwaan1  Peter Verkoeijen1  Katinka Dijkstra1  | |
[1] Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam | |
关键词: theory of mind; literary fiction; replication; meta-analysis; | |
DOI : 10.1525/collabra.117 | |
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合) | |
来源: University of California Press | |
【 摘 要 】
The results reported by Kidd and Castano (2013) indicated that reading a short passage of literary fiction improves theory of mind (ToM) relative to reading popular fiction. However, when we entered Kidd and Castano’s results in a p-curve analysis, it turned out that the evidential value of their findings is low. It is good practice to back up a p-curve analysis of a single paper with an adequately powered direct replication of at least one of the studies in the p-curve analysis. Therefore, we conducted a direct replication of the literary fiction condition and the popular fiction condition from Kidd and Castano’s Experiment 5 to scrutinize the effect of reading literary fiction on ToM. The results of this replication were largely consistent with Kidd and Castano’s original findings. Furthermore, we conducted a small-scale meta-analysis on the findings of the present study, those of Kidd and Castano and those reported in other published direct replications. The meta-analytic effect of reading literary fiction on ToM was small and non-significant but there was considerable heterogeneity between the included studies. The results of the present study and of the small-scale meta-analysis are discussed in the light of reading-times exclusion criteria as well as reliability and validity of ToM measures.
.【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO201904025242896ZK.pdf | 540KB | download |