Barriers to Effective Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Patients’ and Practitioners’ Views

PLoS One

Karine Briot¹  Christian Roux³  Lucile Hervouet⁴  Sophie Alami⁵  Serge Poiraudeau⁶ 

[1] PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Descartes;Service de Rhumatologie B, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France;Service de Rééducation et de réadaptation de l’appareil locomoteur et des pathologies du rachis, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France;Centre de Sociologie des Organisations, Institut des Sciences Politiques, UMR 7116, CNRS, Paris, France;Interlis, Paris, France;U1153 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale

关键词: Osteoporosis;    Physicians;    Bone fracture;    Women's health;    Drug therapy;    Bone density;    General practitioners;    Qualitative studies;   

DOI  :  10.1371/journal.pone.0158365

学科分类：医学（综合）

来源: Public Library of Science

【 摘 要 】

Background Only a minority of patients at high risk for osteoporotic fracture receive treatment. Objective Study patients’ and physicians’ views regarding postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) to identify impediments to good care. Methods A qualitative study involving 18 physicians and 37 women (age 57–87) with PMO. Results All women interviewed considered PMO to be somewhat normal wear-and-tear associated with old age. The women identified a large number of "causes" for osteoporosis but finally viewed it as chance. They all described its progression as slow. Three representations of PMO severity were identified: some women tended to interpreted it as benign (21), others tended to dramatize it (11), and the rest were uncertain (5). These representations did not appear linked to age or fracture. Even the women who associated fracture and PMO were uncertain of the link between them. Fractures were considered to be random events, independent of osteoporosis. Women received general life-style recommendations from their physicians positively, but did not connect them specifically to osteoporosis. Indeed, these recommendations, along with the fear of side effects, the absence of tangible results of treatments, the view of PMO as a natural process, and the representations of PMO severity are factors that may deter treatments and impact compliance. As for the physicians, they identified eight risk factors, recognizing menopause as central to PMO and recognized the link between risk of fracture and PMO. However, some considered the impact of fractures to be limited in time, and viewed PMO as a "benign" disease. Seeing the progression of PMO as slow and inevitable reduced their urgency to diagnose and treat it as compared to other diseases. Some physicians acknowledged limited mastery of the existing therapeutic arsenal and unsuccessful handling of patient compliance. Conclusion Women’s and physicians’ perspectives on PMO converged to trivialize postmenopausal osteoporosis and thus disqualify it as a legitimate disease. A better understanding of women’s and physicians’ views, practices, and concerns related to PMO can improve osteoporosis management.

【 授权许可】

CC BY