Frailty Screening Tools for Elderly Patients Incident to Dialysis

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology: CJASN

Ismay N. van Loon²  Franciscus T.J. Boereboom³ 

[1] and..;*Dianet Dialysis Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands;§Geriatrics and..;‖Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands..Departments of ‡Nephrology and Hypertension and..¶Geriatrics, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

关键词: dialysis;    elderly;    frailty;    geriatric assessment;    screening;    Aged;    Frail Elderly;    Geriatric Assessment;    Humans;    Judgment;    Nephrologists;    Outcome Assessment (Health Care);    renal dialysis;    Renal Insufficiency, Chronic;    Risk;    Safety;    Sensitivity;   

DOI  :  10.2215/CJN.11801116

学科分类：泌尿医学

来源: American Society of Nephrology

【 摘 要 】

Background and objectives A geriatric assessment is an appropriate method for identifying frail elderly patients. In CKD, it may contribute to optimize personalized care. However, a geriatric assessment is time consuming. The purpose of our study was to compare easy to apply frailty screening tools with the geriatric assessment in patients eligible for dialysis.Design, setting, participants, & measurements A total of 123 patients on incident dialysis ≥65 years old were included <3 weeks before to ≤2 weeks after dialysis initiation, and all underwent a geriatric assessment. Patients with impairment in two or more geriatric domains on the geriatric assessment were considered frail. The diagnostic abilities of six frailty screening tools were compared with the geriatric assessment: the Fried Frailty Index, the Groningen Frailty Indicator, Geriatric8, the Identification of Seniors at Risk, the Hospital Safety Program, and the clinical judgment of the nephrologist. Outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.Results In total, 75% of patients were frail according to the geriatric assessment. Sensitivity of frailty screening tools ranged from 48% (Fried Frailty Index) to 88% (Geriatric8). The discriminating features of the clinical judgment were comparable with the other screening tools. The Identification of Seniors at Risk screening tool had the best discriminating abilities, with a sensitivity of 74%, a specificity of 80%, a positive predictive value of 91%, and a negative predictive value of 52%. The negative predictive value was poor for all tools, which means that almost one half of the patients screened as fit (nonfrail) had two or more geriatric impairments on the geriatric assessment.Conclusions All frailty screening tools are able to detect geriatric impairment in elderly patients eligible for dialysis. However, all applied screening tools, including the judgment of the nephrologist, lack the discriminating abilities to adequately rule out frailty compared with a geriatric assessment.

【 授权许可】

CC BY