期刊论文详细信息
Current oncology
Report on a Delphi process and workshop to improve accrual to cancer clinical trials
L.G. Balneaves2  H. Richardson2  M.T. Kelly3  J.A.H. Bell3 
[1] NCIC Clinical Trials Group;University of Toronto;Princess Margaret Cancer Centre;Queens University
关键词: Cancer clinical trials;    trial accrual;    ethics;    patient autonomy;    patient decision-making;    knowledge translation;    access;    barriers;   
DOI  :  10.3747/co.23.3110
学科分类:肿瘤学
来源: Multimed, Inc.
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Cancer clinical trials (ccts) are essential for furthering knowledge and developing effective interventions to improve the lives of people living with cancer in Canada. Randomized controlled trials are particularly important for developing evidence-based health care interventions. To produce robust and relevant research conclusions, timely and sufficient accrual to ccts is essential.The present report delivers the key recommendations emerging from a workshop meeting, Improve Accrual to Cancer Clinical Trials, that was hosted by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group and funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The meeting, which took place in Toronto, Ontario, in April 2012 before the Canadian Cancer Trials Group annual spring meeting, brought together key stakeholders from across Canada to explore creative strategies for improving accrual to ccts. The objectives of the workshop were to provide an opportunity for knowledge exchange with respect to the research evidence and the ethics theory related to cct accrual and to promote discussion of best practices and policies related to enhancing cct access and accrual in Canada.The workshop provided the foundation for establishing new interdisciplinary research collaborations to overcome the identified barriers to cct participation in Canada. Meeting participants also supported the development of evidence-based policies and practices to make trials more accessible to Canadians living with cancer.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201902027966372ZK.pdf 151KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:14次 浏览次数:7次