期刊论文详细信息
Ecology and Society: a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability
Changed knowledge requirements for spatial flood governance
Bergsma, Emmy1 
关键词: experts;    flood governance;    knowledge;    policy arrangements framework;    spatial-planning;   
DOI  :  10.5751/ES-08952-210440
学科分类:生物科学(综合)
来源: Resilience Alliance Publications
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Floods have not only occurred with greater frequency, they have become more damaging over the years. The associated rising costs have challenged traditional governance approaches that aim to provide full protection against floods. By aiming for protection, these approaches have allowed value to accumulate in high-risk areas. Now thatclimate change puts more floods on the horizon, policy-makers around the world have turned to “spatial-planning” measures that aim to reduce exposure to flood risks rather than provide full protection. This policy transition not only involves the development of new policy approaches and governance arrangements, it places new requirements on knowledge to support these approaches and arrangements. I analyze these changed knowledge requirements in a case study on the Netherlands. The Netherlands thrived on a technical safety approach in the 20th century, but since the late 1990s, a number of spatial planning policies have been forwarded. Building on the policy arrangements framework as a conceptual model, I add a newknowledge dimension to this framework to analyze what new knowledge requirements emerged in the Dutch turn to spatial-planning measures and how these new forms of knowledge could be organized within existing safety institutions. Based on the analysis, I conclude that spatial-planning measures require new forms of “localized” policy knowledge to support the more decentralized responsibility structuresthat underpin spatial-planning measures. I also conclude that this form of expertise may be difficult to organize within safety institutions dueto the strong interactions between nationally oriented engineers and policy-makers that characterize safety approaches.

【 授权许可】

Others   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201902013333791ZK.pdf 145KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:10次