| Research Ethics | |
| How idiocultures and warrants operate independently in New Zealand health ethics review boards: | |
| MartinTolich1  | |
| 关键词: ethics committees; ethnography; idioculture; Maori; research ethics; warrants; | |
| DOI : 10.1177/1747016114542546 | |
| 学科分类:医学(综合) | |
| 来源: Sage Journals | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Laura Stark’s ethnography of IRB decision-making unearthed two concerns: first, even though the committees were governed by ethical principles, the committees generated their own precedents for future decision-making; second, Stark witnessed unequal power relations within committee decision-making as a member’s expertise was accepted as a ‘warrant’. This article examines how these warrants are practiced within the decision-making process of New Zealand’s four Health and Disability Ethics Committees (HDECs or IRBs). More specifically, this article concerns these warrants during a committee’s decision to consult with indigenous communities, a decision for which there exist no guidelines. The article ends by discussing ethical issues when observing in public places.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO201901225240282ZK.pdf | 101KB |
PDF