Freedom as non-domination in behavioral and biomedical research:

Research Ethics

AidanKestigian¹ 

关键词: autonomy;    clinical research;    non-domination;    oppression;    research involving human subjects;    social science;   

DOI  :  10.1177/1747016117719064

学科分类：医学（综合）

来源: Sage Journals

【 摘 要 】

In the biomedical and behavioral sciences, it is widely recognized that researchers conducting studies involving human participants must respect the autonomy of research subjects. There is significant debate in the clinical research ethics and bioethics literatures about what it means for an individual to be autonomous. According to proponents of the Liberal Conception of Autonomy (LCA), an autonomous person is an agent who has interests and opinions and the capacity to deliberate about them. In contrast, proponents of the Relational Conception of Autonomy (RCA) argue that because humans are social creatures, autonomy is a relational concept and ought to be recognized as such by medical professionals. In this article, I argue that the LCA/RCA debate is flawed, and that the notion of freedom as non-domination, rather than autonomy, ought to be adopted for biomedical research ethics policies regarding informed consent and research agenda-setting. I then argue that this view of freedom should also be adopted...

【 授权许可】

CC BY