| Patient Safety in Surgery | |
| Bacterial contamination of suction catheter tips during aortic valve replacement surgery: a prospective observational cohort study | |
| Per-Arne Svensson3  Elisabeth Hansson Olofsson1  Anders Jeppsson3  Christine Roman-Emanuel4  Åsa Söderström2  Sofia Sutherland4  Johanna Larsson4  | |
| [1] Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden;Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden;Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Vitastråket 15, Gothenburg, 41345, Sweden;Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden | |
| 关键词: Thoracic surgery; Bacterial contamination; Suction catheter tip; | |
| Others : 1210301 DOI : 10.1186/s13037-015-0066-5 |
|
| received in 2015-02-02, accepted in 2015-04-27, 发布年份 2015 | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background
Bacterial mediastinitis is a severe complication after open heart surgery. The infection causes prolonged hospitalization and an increased mortality risk. Observations from orthopaedic surgery showed that the suction catheter used during surgery is commonly contaminated with bacteria. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of suction catheter contamination in cardiac surgery and to study if suction time influences the contamination risk.
Methods
Fifty suction catheter tips were collected during 25 aortic valve replacement operations. The suction tip was exchanged once during the operation (after aortotomy closure). The tips were subjected to bacterial contamination analysis.
Results
In 20 of the 25 investigated cases (80%), bacterial contamination was detected on one or both tips. The tip used during the beginning of the operation showed bacterial contamination in 13/25 cases (52%) and the second tip in 12/25 (48%). In 5/25 cases (20%) both tips were contaminated. There was no association between bacterial contamination and suction time. Coagulase-negative staphylococcus was the most commonly detected microorganism.
Conclusions
The suction device should be considered as a potential source of bacterial contamination in cardiac surgery. The results suggest that the suction catheter should be replaced before key moments like valve implantation and sternal closure.
【 授权许可】
2015 Larsson et al.; licensee BioMed Central.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150605081748586.pdf | 398KB | ||
| Figure 2. | 18KB | Image | |
| Figure 1. | 18KB | Image |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Falk-Brynhildsen K, Soderquist B, Friberg O, Nilsson UG. Bacterial recolonization of the skin and wound contamination during cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial of the use of plastic adhesive drape compared with bare skin. J Hosp Infect. 2013; 84(2):151-8.
- [2]Kuhme T, Isaksson B, Dahlin LG. Wound contamination in cardiac surgery. A systematic quantitative and qualitative study of the bacterial growth in sternal wounds in cardiac surgery patients. APMIS. 2007; 115(9):1001-7.
- [3]Owens CD, Stoessel K. Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention. J Hosp Infect. 2008; 70 Suppl 2:3-10.
- [4]Hollenbeak CS, Murphy DM, Koenig S, Woodward RS, Dunagan WC, Fraser VJ. The clinical and economic impact of deep chest surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Chest. 2000; 118(2):397-402.
- [5]Urban JA. Cost analysis of surgical site infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006; 7 Suppl 1:S19-22.
- [6]Leaper DJ, van Goor H, Reilly J, Petrosillo N, Geiss HK, Torres AJ et al.. Surgical site infection - a European perspective of incidence and economic burden. Int Wound J. 2004; 1(4):247-73.
- [7]Rothrock JC. Alexander’s Care of the Patient in Surgery. 4th ed. Mo. Mosby/Elsevier, St. Louis; 2011.
- [8]Gardlund B, Bitkover CY, Vaage J. Postoperative mediastinitis in cardiac surgery - microbiology and pathogenesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002; 21(5):825-30.
- [9]El Oakley RM, Wright JE. Postoperative mediastinitis: classification and management. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996; 61(3):1030-6.
- [10]Bitkover CY, Marcusson E, Ransjo U. Spread of coagulase-negative staphylococci during cardiac operations in a modern operating room. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 69(4):1110-5.
- [11]Davis N, Curry A, Gambhir AK, Panigrahi H, Walker CR, Wilkins EG et al.. Intraoperative bacterial contamination in operations for joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81(5):886-9.
- [12]Givissis P, Karataglis D, Antonarakos P, Symeonidis PD, Christodoulou A. Suction during orthopaedic surgery. How safe is the suction tip? Acta Orthop Belg. 2008; 74(4):531-3.
- [13]Greenough CG. An investigation into contamination of operative suction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986; 68(1):151-3.
- [14]Meals RA, Knoke L. The surgical suction top–a contaminated instrument. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60(3):409-10.
- [15]Mulcahy DM, McCormack D, McElwain JP. Intraoperative suction catheter tip contamination. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1994; 39(6):371-3.
- [16]Robinson AH, Drew S, Anderson J, Bentley G, Ridgway GL. Suction tip contamination in the ultraclean-air operating theatre. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993; 75(4):254-6.
- [17]Strange-Vognsen HH, Klareskov B. Bacteriologic contamination of suction tips during hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 1988; 59(4):410-1.
- [18]Mossad SB, Serkey JM, Longworth DL, Cosgrove DM, Gordon SM. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal sternal wound infections after open heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997; 63(2):395-401.
PDF