A novel method to follow meiotic progression in Arabidopsis using confocal microscopy and 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine labeling

Plant Methods

Clare A Hasenkampf¹  Wajma Azimi²  Patti E Stronghill¹ 

[1] Department of Biology, University of Toronto, 1265 Military Trail, Scarborough, Canada;Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Canada

关键词: DNA replication;    Multi-criteria meiotic staging;    Time course;    Tapetal cells;    Meiocyte filament;    EdU labeling;    Confocal microscopy;    Prophase I;    S-phase;    Meiosis;    Arabidopsis;   

Others  :  1151517
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-4811-10-33

 received in 2014-09-09, accepted in 2014-10-08,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Meiosis progression in the more recent past has been investigated using 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) uptake by S-phase meiocytes undergoing DNA replication. BrdU uptake is detected by reaction with BrdU antibody followed by epifluorescent microscopy examination of chromosome spreads and/or squashes. We here report using confocal microscopic examination of intact meiocytes in conjunction with the new thymidine analog 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU). The simplicity of the EdU detection coupled with confocal examination of anthers provides a more exact temporal description of meiotic prophase I progression in Arabidopsis and opens up the possibility of examining the coordination of microsporocyte development with the other tissues of the anther.

Results

Using our time course protocol, we have determined the duration of wild type Arabidopsis leptotene to be 5 h, zygotene -6 h, pachytene -10 h and a diplotene duration of approximately 1 h. We estimate G2 duration to be approximately 7 h based on the timing of the initial appearance of EdU signal in early leptotene meiocytes. In addition we have found that DNA replication in meiocytes is not done synchronously with the associated tapetal layer of cells. The EdU labeling suggests that S-phase replication of meiocyte DNA precedes the duplication of tapetal cell DNA.

Conclusions

The increased number of meiotic staging criteria that can be assessed in our confocal analysis, as compared to chromosome spreading or squashing, makes the identification of even the early and late portions of the prophase I substages attainable. This enhanced staging coupled with the ability to easily generate large data sets at hourly time points makes it possible to more exactly determine substage duration and to detect modest temporal abnormalities involving meiocyte entrance into and/or exit from leptotene, zygotene and pachytene. Confocal analysis also makes it possible to study the relationships between different cell types within the flower bud as meiosis proceeds.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Stronghill et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Van’t Hof J: Relationships between mitotic cycle duration, S period duration and the average rate of DNA synthesis in the root meristem cells of several plants. Exp Cell Res 1965, 39:48-58.
• [2]Bennet MD, Chapman V, Riley R: The duration of meiosis in pollen mother cells of wheat, rye and Triticale. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 1971, 178:250-275.
• [3]Strich R: Meiotic DNA Replication. Curr Topics in Dev Biol 2004, 61:29-60.
• [4]Armstrong S, Franklin FCH, Jones GH: Nucleolus-associated telomere clustering and pairing precede meiotic chromosome synapsis in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Cell Sci 2001, 114:4207-4217.
• [5]Armstrong SJ, Franklin FCH, Jones GH: A meiotic time course for Arabidopsis thaliana. Sex Plant Repro 2003, 16:141-149.
• [6]Armstrong SJ, Jones GH: Meiotic cytology and chromosome behaviour in wild type Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Biol 2003, 380:1-10.
• [7]Stronghill P, Hasenkampf CA: Analysis of Substage Associations in Prophase I of Meiosis in Floral Buds of Wild Type Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). Amer J Bot 2007, 94:2063-2067.
• [8]Warren M, Puskarcyzk K, Chapman SC: Chick embryo proliferation studies using EdU labeling. Dev Dynamics 2009, 238:944-949.
• [9]Yu Y, Arora A, Roifman CM, Grunebaum E: EdU incorporation is an alternative non-radioactive assay to [(3)H]thymidine uptake for in vitro measurement of mice T-cell proliferations. J Immunol Methods 2009, 350:29-35.
• [10]Mead TJ, Lefebvre V: Proliferation Assays (BrdU and EdU) on Skeletal Tissue Sections. Focus 2014, 1130:233-243.
• [11]Armstrong SJ: A time course for the analysis of meiotic progression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Methods in Mol Biol 2013, 990:119-123.
• [12]Ross KJ, Fransz P, Jones GH: A light microscopic atlas of meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Chromosome Res 1996, 7:507-516.
• [13]Sanchez- Moran E, Santos J-L, Jones GH, Franklin FCH: ASY1 mediates AtDMC1-dependent interhomolog recombination during meiosis in Arabidopsis. Genes & Dev 2007, 21:2220-2233.
• [14]Owen HA, Makaroff CA: Ultrastructure of microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Protoplasma 1995, 185:7-21.
• [15]Pathan N, Stronghill P, Hasenkampf C: Transmission electron microscopy and serial reconstructions reveal novel meiotic phenotypes for the ahp2 Mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome 2013, 3:139-145.