期刊论文详细信息
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
PreImplantation factor (PIF) detection in maternal circulation in early pregnancy correlates with live birth (bovine model)
Eytan R Barnea4  Roumen G Roussev3  Marshall Ruble1  Leo Timms1  Christopher Stamatkin2  Sivakumar Ramu2 
[1] Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 2229 Lincoln Way, Ames, IA 50011, USA;CARI Laboratories, 233 E. Erie Street, #520, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA;Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 73 Tzarigradsko Shosse, Sofia, Bulgaria;BioIncept LLC, 1697 Lark Lane, Cherry Hill, NJ 08003, USA
关键词: Embryo viability;    Monoclonal anti-PIF antibody;    Pregnancy outcome;    Live birth;    ELISA;    Pregnancy BioMarker;    PreImplantation factor (PIF);   
Others  :  809872
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7827-11-105
 received in 2013-09-19, accepted in 2013-11-12,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Early identification of viable pregnancy is paramount for successful reproduction. Detection of specific signals from pre-implantation viable embryos in normal pregnancy circulation would indicate initiation of embryo-maternal interaction and create a continuum to accurately reflect embryo/fetal well-being post-implantation. Viable mammalian embryos secrete PreImplantation Factor (PIF), a biomarker which plays key, multi-targeted roles to promote implantation, trophoblast invasion and modulate maternal innate and adaptive immunity toward acceptance. Anti-PIF monoclonal antibody (mAb-based chemiluminescent ELISA) accurately detects PIF in singly cultured embryos media and its increased levels correlate with embryo development up to the blastocyst stage. Herein reported that PIF levels (ELISA) in early maternal serum correlate with pregnancy outcome.

Methods

Artificially inseminated (AI) blind-coded Angus cattle (N = 21-23) serum samples (day10,15 & 20 post-AI) with known calf birth were blindly tested, using both non-pregnant heifers (N = 30) and steer serum as negative controls. Assay properties and anti-PIF monoclonal antibody specificity were determined by examining linearity, spike and recovery experiments and testing the antibody against 234 different circulating proteins by microarray. Endogenous PIF was detected using <3 kDa filter separation followed by anti-PIF mAb-based affinity chromatography and confirmed by ELISA and HPLC. PIF expression was established in placenta using anti-PIF mAb-based IHC.

Results

PIF detects viable pregnancy at day 10 post-AI with 91.3% sensitivity, reaching 100% by day 20 and correlating with live calf birth. All non-pregnant samples were PIF negative. PIF level in pregnant samples was a stringent 3 + SD higher as compared to heifers and steer sera. Assay is linear and spike and recovery data demonstrates lack of serum interference. Anti-PIF mAb is specific and does not interact with circulating proteins. Anti-PIF based affinity purification demonstrates that endogenous PIF is what ELISA detects. The early bovine placenta expresses PIF in the trophoblast layer.

Conclusion

Data herein documents that PIF is a specific, reliable embryo-derived biomarker conveniently detectable in early maternal circulation. PIF ELISA emerges as practical tool to detect viable early pregnancy from day 20 post-AI.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Ramu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140709025130977.pdf 802KB PDF download
Figure 4. 22KB Image download
Figure 3. 87KB Image download
Figure 2. 28KB Image download
Figure 1. 28KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]O’Neill C: Thrombocytopenia is an initial maternal response to fertilization in mice. J Reprod Fertil 1985, 73:559-566.
  • [2]Nahhas F, Barnea E: Human embryonic origin early pregnancy factor before and after implantation. Am J Reprod Immunol 1990, 22:105-108.
  • [3]Somerset DA, Zheng Y, Kilby MD, Sansom DM, Drayson MT: Normal human pregnancy is associated with an elevation in the immune suppressive CD25+ CD4+ regulatory T-cell subset. Immunology 2004, 112:38-43.
  • [4]Barnea ER: Insight into early pregnancy events: the emerging role of the embryo. Am J Reprod Immunol 2004, 51:319-322.
  • [5]Barnea ER: Applying embryo-derived immune tolerance to the treatment of immune disorders. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007, 1110:602-618.
  • [6]Stamatkin CW, Roussev RG, Stout M, Absalon-Medina V, Ramu S, Goodman C, Coulam CB, Gilbert RO, Godke RA, Barnea ER: PreImplantation factor (PIF) correlates with early mammalian embryo development-bovine and murine models. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2011, 9:63. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [7]Stamatkin CW, Roussev RG, Stout M, Coulam CB, Triche E, Godke RA, Barnea ER: Preimplantation factor negates embryo toxicity and promotes embryo development in culture. Reprod Biomed Online 2011, 23:517-524.
  • [8]Barnea ER, Kirk D, Ramu S, Rivnay B, Roussev R, Paidas MJ: PreImplantation factor (PIF) orchestrates systemic antiinflammatory response by immune cells: effect on peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012, 207:313. e311-311
  • [9]Paidas MJ, Krikun G, Huang SJ, Jones R, Romano M, Annunziato J, Barnea ER: A genomic and proteomic investigation of the impact of preimplantation factor on human decidual cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010, 202:459. e451-458
  • [10]Barnea ER, Kirk D, Paidas MJ: Preimplantation factor (PIF*) promoting role in embryo implantation: increases endometrial integrin-alpha2beta3 and amphiregulin and epiregulin while reducing betacellulin expression via MAPK in decidua. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2012, 10:50. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [11]Duzyj CM, Barnea ER, Li M, Huang SJ, Krikun G, Paidas MJ: Preimplantation factor promotes first trimester trophoblast invasion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010, 203:402. e401-404
  • [12]Roussev R, Dons’koi B, Stamatkin C, Ramu S, Chernyshov V, Coulam CB, Barnea ER: Preimplantation factor inhibits circulating natural killer cell cytotoxicity and reduces CD69 expression: implications for recurrent pregnancy loss therapy. Reprod Biomed Online 2012, 26:79-87.
  • [13]Barnea ER, Simon J, Levine SP, Coulam CB, Taliadouros GS, Leavis PC: Progress in characterization of pre-implantation factor in embryo cultures and in vivo. Am J Reprod Immunol 1999, 42:95-99.
  • [14]Than NG, Paidas MJ, Mizutani S, Sharma S, Padbury J, Barnea ER: Embryo-placento-maternal interaction and biomarkers: from diagnosis to therapy--a workshop report. Placenta 2007, 28(Suppl A):S107-110.
  • [15]Barnea ER: Assays for PreImplantation factor and PreImplantation factor peptides: vol. US7,273,708 B2. United States; 2007.
  • [16]Weiss L, Bernstein S, Jones R, Amunugama R, Krizman D, Jebailey L, Almogi-Hazan O, Yekhtin Z, Shiner R, Reibstein I, et al.: Preimplantation factor (PIF) analog prevents type I diabetes mellitus (TIDM) development by preserving pancreatic function in NOD mice. Endocrine 2011, 40:41-54.
  • [17]Weiss L, Or R, Jones RC, Amunugama R, JeBailey L, Ramu S, Bernstein SA, Yekhtin Z, Almogi-Hazan O, Shainer R, et al.: Preimplantation factor (PIF*) reverses neuroinflammation while promoting neural repair in EAE model. J Neurol Sci 2012, 312:146-157.
  • [18]Azar Y, Shainer R, Almogi-Hazan O, Bringer R, Compton SR, Paidas MJ, Barnea ER, Or R: PreImplantation factor reduces graft-versus-host disease by regulating immune response and lowering oxidative stress (murine model). Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2013, 19:519-528.
  • [19]Shainer R, Azar Y, Almogi-Hazan O, Bringer R, Compton SR, Paidas MJ, Barnea ER, Or R: Immune regulation and oxidative stress reduction by pre-implantation factor (PIF*) following syngeneic or allogenic bone marrow transplantation. Conference Papers in Medicine 2013, 2013:1-8.
  • [20]Romano JE, Thompson JA, Kraemer DC, Westhusin ME, Forrest DW, Tomaszweski MA: Early pregnancy diagnosis by palpation per rectum: influence on embryo/fetal viability in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2007, 67:486-493.
  • [21]Starbuck MJ, Dailey RA, Inskeep EK: Factors affecting retention of early pregnancy in dairy cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2004, 84:27-39.
  • [22]Siqueira LG, Areas VS, Ghetti AM, Fonseca JF, Palhao MP, Fernandes CA, Viana JH: Color doppler flow imaging for the early detection of nonpregnant cattle at 20 days after timed artificial insemination. J Dairy Sci 2013, 96:6461-6472.
  • [23]Faustini M, Battocchio M, Vigo D, Prandi A, Veronesi MC, Comin A, Cairoli F: Pregnancy diagnosis in dairy cows by whey progesterone analysis: an ROC approach. Theriogenology 2007, 67:1386-1392.
  • [24]Dadarwal D, Mapletoft RJ, Adams GP, Pfeifer LF, Creelman C, Singh J: Effect of progesterone concentration and duration of proestrus on fertility in beef cattle after fixed-time artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2013, 79:859-866.
  • [25]Pare J, Audet-Grenier MH, Rouillier P, Sirard MA: Evaluation of the DG29 test for early detection of pregnancy in cattle. Can Vet J 2008, 49:1119-1121.
  • [26]Romano JE, Larson JE: Accuracy of pregnancy specific protein-B test for early pregnancy diagnosis in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2010, 74:932-939.
  • [27]Piechotta M, Bollwein J, Friedrich M, Heilkenbrinker T, Passavant C, Branen J, Sasser G, Hoedemaker M, Bollwein H: Comparison of commercial ELISA blood tests for early pregnancy detection in dairy cows. J Reprod Dev 2011, 57:72-75.
  • [28]Silva E, Sterry RA, Kolb D, Mathialagan N, McGrath MF, Ballam JM, Fricke PM: Accuracy of a pregnancy-associated glycoprotein ELISA to determine pregnancy status of lactating dairy cows twenty-seven days after timed artificial insemination. J Dairy Sci 2007, 90:4612-4622.
  • [29]Green JC, Volkmann DH, Poock SE, McGrath MF, Ehrhardt M, Moseley AE, Lucy MC: Technical note: a rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay blood test for pregnancy in dairy and beef cattle. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:3819-3824.
  • [30]Kizaki K, Shichijo-Kizaki A, Furusawa T, Takahashi T, Hosoe M, Hashizume K: Differential neutrophil gene expression in early bovine pregnancy. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2013, 11:6. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [31]Mayer J, Soller JT, Beck J, Purwins V, Wemheuer W, Schutz E, Brenig B: Early pregnancy diagnosis in dairy cows using circulating nucleic acids. Theriogenology 2013, 79:173-179.
  • [32]Matsuyama S, Kojima T, Kato S, Kimura K: Relationship between quantity of IFNT estimated by IFN-stimulated gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and bovine embryonic mortality after AI or ET. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2012, 10:21. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [33]Lee JI, Kim IH: Pregnancy loss in dairy cows: the contributing factors, the effects on reproductive performance and the economic impact. J Vet Sci 2007, 8:283-288.
  • [34]Diskin MG, Parr MH, Morris DG: Embryo death in cattle: an update. Reprod Fertil Dev 2011, 24:244-251.
  • [35]Wattiaux MA: Pregnancy and calving. 2013. [Reproduction and genetic selection] vol. http://babcock.wisc.edu/node/162: webcite Babcock Institute for International Dairy Research and Development
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:5次 浏览次数:4次