期刊论文详细信息
Radiation Oncology
Improvement of therapeutic index for brain tumors with daily image guidance
Aaron C Spalding3  Todd W Vitaz1  Kristi Scalf2  Maria Ragains2  Catherine Dedich2  James M Coons2  Lisa BE Shields1 
[1] The Brain Tumor Center, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, KY, USA;The Norton Cancer Institute Radiation Center and Kosair Children’s Hospital, Louisville, KY, USA;The Norton Cancer Institute Radiation Center, 676 S. Floyd St., Suite 100, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
关键词: CNS malignancy;    Brain tumor;    Oncology;    Radiation;   
Others  :  829535
DOI  :  10.1186/1748-717X-8-283
 received in 2013-07-24, accepted in 2013-11-26,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Image-guidance maximizes the therapeutic index of brain irradiation by decreasing setup uncertainty. As dose-volume data emerge defining the tolerance of critical normal structures responsible for neuroendocrine function and neurocognition, minimizing clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) expansion of targets near these structures potentially lessens long-term toxicity.

Methods

We reviewed the treatment records of 29 patients with brain tumors, with a total of 517 fractions analyzed. The CTV was uniformly expanded by 3 mm to create the PTV for all cases. We determined the effect of patient specific factors (prescribed medications, weight gain, tumor location) and image-guidance technique on setup uncertainty and plotted the mean +/- standard deviation for each factor. ANOVA was used to determine significance between these factors on setup uncertainty. We determined the impact of applying the initial three fraction variation as custom PTV-expansion on dose to normal structures.

Results

The initial 3 mm margin encompassed 88% of all measured shifts from daily imaging for all fractions. There was no difference (p = n.s.) in average setup uncertainty between CBCT or kV imaging for all patients. Vertical, lateral, longitudinal, and 3D shifts were similar (p = n.s.) between days 1, 2, and 3 imaging and later fractions. Patients prescribed sedatives experienced increased setup uncertainty (p < 0.05), while weight gain, corticosteroid administration, and anti-seizure medication did not associate with increased setup uncertainty. Patients with targets near OAR with individualized margins led to decreased OAR dose. No reductions to targets occurred with individualized PTVs.

Conclusions

Daily imaging allows application of individualized CTV expansion to reduce dose to OAR responsible for neurocognition, learning, and neuroendocrine function below doses shown to correlate with long-term morbidity. The demonstrated reduction in dose to OAR in this study has implications for quality of life and provides the motivation to pursue custom PTV expansion.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Shields et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140714072029286.pdf 1796KB PDF download
Figure 5. 184KB Image download
Figure 4. 40KB Image download
Figure 3. 46KB Image download
Figure 2. 45KB Image download
Figure 1. 46KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements: ICRU Report 50: Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy. Bethesda, MD: ICRU; 1993.
  • [2]Beltran C, Naik M, Merchant TE: Dosimetric effect of setup motion and target volume margin reduction in pediatric ependymoma. Radiother Oncol 2010, 96(2):216-222.
  • [3]Beltran C, Trussell J, Merchant TE: Dosimetric impact of intrafractional patient motion in pediatric brain tumor patients. Med Dosim 2010, 35(1):43-48.
  • [4]Beltran C, Krasin MJ, Merchant TE: Inter- and intrafractional positional uncertainties in pediatric radiotherapy patients with brain and head and neck tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011, 79(4):1266-1274.
  • [5]Cho BC, Cho BC, van Herk M, Mijnheer BJ, Bartelink H: The effect of set-up uncertainties, contour changes, and tissue inhomogeneities on target dose-volume histograms. Med Phys 2002, 29(10):2305-2318.
  • [6]Rahimian J, Chen JC, Rao AA, Girvigian MR, Miller MJ, Greathouse HE: Geometrical accuracy of the Novalis stereotactic radiosurgery system for trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2004, 101(Suppl 3):351-355.
  • [7]O'Gorman RL, Jarosz JM, Samuel M, Clough C, Selway RP, Ashkan K: CT/MR image fusion in the postoperative assessment of electrodes implanted for deep brain stimulation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2009, 87(4):205-210.
  • [8]Merchant TE, Kun LE, Wu S, Xiong X, Sanford RA, Boop FA: Phase II trial of conformal radiation therapy for pediatric low-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27(22):3598-3604.
  • [9]Dunbar SF, Tarbell NJ, Kooy HM, Alexander E III, Black PM, Barnes PD, Goumnerova L, Scott RM, Pomeroy SL, La VB: Stereotactic radiotherapy for pediatric and adult brain tumors: preliminary report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994, 30(3):531-539.
  • [10]Merchant TE, Kiehna EN, Kun LE, Mulhern RK, Li C, Xiong X, Boop FA, Sanford RA: Phase II trial of conformal radiation therapy for pediatric patients with craniopharyngioma and correlation of surgical factors and radiation dosimetry with change in cognitive function. J Neurosurg 2006, 104(2 Suppl):94-102.
  • [11]Merchant TE: Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for ependymoma. Childs Nerv Syst 2009, 25(10):1261-1268.
  • [12]Hong TS, Tome WA, Chappell RJ, Chinnaiyan P, Mehta MP, Harari PM: The impact of daily setup variations on head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 61(3):779-788.
  • [13]Kumar S, Burke K, Nalder C, Jarrett P, Mubata C, A'hern R, Humphreys M, Bidmead M, Brada M: Treatment accuracy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2005, 74(1):53-59.
  • [14]Beltran C, Pai Panandiker AS, Krasin MJ, Merchant TE: Daily image-guided localization for neuroblastoma. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2010, 11(4):3388.
  • [15]Beltran C, Naik M, Merchant TE: Dosimetric effect of target expansion and setup uncertainty during radiation therapy in pediatric craniopharyngioma. Radiother Oncol 2010, 97(3):399-403.
  • [16]Menke M, Hirschfeld F, Mack T, Pastyr O, Sturm V, Schlegel W: Photogrammetric accuracy measurements of head holder systems used for fractionated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994, 29(5):1147-1155.
  • [17]Rabinowitz I, Broomberg J, Goitein M, McCarthy K, Leong J: Accuracy of radiation field alignment in clinical practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985, 11(10):1857-1867.
  • [18]Tome WA, Meeks SL, McNutt TR, Buatti JM, Bova FJ, Friedman WA, Mehta M: Optically guided intensity modulated radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2001, 61(1):33-44.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:51次 浏览次数:9次