Expanding availability of safe abortion services through private sector accreditation: a case study of the Yukti Yojana program in Bihar, India

Reproductive Health

Garima Mathias¹  Deepa Navin¹  Kathryn Louise Andersen²  Sushanta Kumar Banerjee¹ 

[1] Ipas Development Foundation, E-63 Vasant Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi 110 057, India;Ipas, 300 Market St., Suite 200, Chapel Hill 27516, NC, USA

关键词: India;    Health services;    Evaluation;    Accreditation;    Abortion;   

Others  :  1233253
DOI  :  10.1186/s12978-015-0096-6

 received in 2015-05-19, accepted in 2015-11-03,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Recognizing the need to increase access to safe abortion services to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity, the state government of Bihar, India introduced an innovative mechanism of accrediting private health care facilities. The program, Yukti Yojana (‘a scheme for solution’), accredits eligible health facilities and supports them in providing abortion-related services free of charge to rural and low-income urban women. This paper describes implementation of Yukti Yojana.

Methods

A descriptive analysis of abortion services provided under the Yukti Yojana program was conducted using four data sources: 1) assessment of accredited facilities over 6 months; 2) induced and incomplete abortion service registers; 3) client exit interviews and associated direct observation of client-provider interaction for a sample of accredited facilities; and 4) in-depth interviews with providers and key stakeholders responsible for providing or influencing abortion services. These analyses assessed characteristics of women receiving abortion services, quality of care and client satisfaction, and barriers and facilitating factors of a successful accreditation process.

Results

Forty-nine private facilities were accredited during the first two years of the program, and 84 % had begun providing abortion services, in all 27,724 women were served. Overall, 53 % of beneficiaries reported holding a “Below Poverty Line” card, while 71 % had low living standard. The majority of women (n = 569) reported satisfaction (90 %) with their care, while 68 % perceived good quality of services. Having a government-led initiative was considered a key element of success, while stringent requirements for site approval, long waiting time for accreditation, complicated and delayed reimbursement process and low reimbursement fees for abortion services were identified as barriers to implementation.

Conclusions

Yukti Yojana provides a model for successfully involving private OB/GYNs and general physicians to deliver safe abortion services to poor women on a large scale and offers additional evidence that public-private partnerships can be used to ensure availability of high-quality maternal health services to women in low-income countries. Private facility accreditation also offers a promising solution to the limited availability of safe abortion services in low resource settings such as Bihar, India.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Banerjee et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Duggal R, Ramachandran V. The abortion assessment project–India: key findings and recommendations. Reprod Health Matters. 2004; 12(24):122-9.
• [2]Special bulleitn on maternal mortality in India 2010–2012: sample registration system. Office of Registrar General, India, New Delhi; 2013.
• [3]Banerjee SK. Estimating induced abortion through indirect method. 2010.
• [4]Aich P, Banerjee SK, Jha TK, Aggarwal A. Situation analysis of MTP services in Bihar. Ipas India, New Delhi; 2011.
• [5]Banerjee SK, Andersen KL, Warvadekar J. Pathways and consequences of unsafe abortion: a comparison among women with complications after induced and spontaneous abortions in Madhya Pradesh, India. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012; 118 Supplement 2:S113-20.
• [6]Peters DH. Better health systems for India’s poor. World Bank, Washington; 2002.
• [7]McCord C, Premkumar R, Arole S, Arole R. Efficient and effective emergency obstetric care in a rural Indian community where most deliveries are at home. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001; 75:297-307.
• [8]Scrivens E. International trends in accreditation. Int J Health Plann Manage. 1995; 10:165-81.
• [9]Rooney A, van Ostenberg P. Licensure, accreditation and certification: approaches to health services quality. USAID, Washington; 1999.
• [10]Montagu D. Accreditation and other external quality assessment systems for healthcare: review of experience and lessons learned. Health Systems Resource Centre, Department of International Development, London; 2003.
• [11]Cleveland EC, Dahn BT, Lincoln TM, Safer M, Podesta M, Bradley E. Introducing health facility accreditation in Liberia. Glob Public Health. 2011; 6(3):271-82.
• [12]Bouchet B, Francisco M, Ovretveit J. The Zambia quality assurance programme: successes and challenges. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002; 14:89-95.
• [13]Rob U, Rahman M, Bellows B. Evaluation of the impact of the voucher and accreditation approach on improving reproductive health behaviors and status: Bangladesh. BMC Public Health. 2011; 22:257. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]Bellows B, Warren C, Vonthanak S, Chhorvann C, Sokhom H, Men C et al.. Evaluation of the impact of the voucher and accreditation approach on improving reproductive behaviours and status in Cambodia. BMC Public Health. 2011; 24:667. BioMed Central Full Text
• [15]Warren C, Abuya T, Obare F, Sunday J, Njue R, Askew I et al.. Evaluation of the impact of the voucher and accreditation approach on improving reproductive health behaviors and status in Kenya. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:177. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Quality assurance manual for sterilization services. New Delhi: Research Studies and Standards Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, India; 2006.
• [17]Mavalankar D, Singh A, Patel S, Desai A, Singh P. Saving mothers and newborns thorugh an innovative partnership with private sector obstetricians: Chiranjeevi scheme of Gujarat, India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009; 107:271-6.
• [18]Guidelines for accreditation of private sites for provision of comprehensive abortion care services. Government of Bihar and National Rural Health Mission, India, Patna; 2011.
• [19]Banerjee SK, Andersen K. Analysis of Ipas monitoring data for public health facilities in Bihar, India between July 2011 and June 2014. 2014.
• [20]Banerjee SK, Andersen KL, Baird TL, Batra S, Warvadekar J. Evaluation of a multi-pronged intervention to improve access to safe abortion care in two districts in Jharkhand. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14(5):227-39. BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, Romero M, Ganatra B, Okonofua FE et al.. Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. Lancet. 2006; 368(9550):1908-19.