AGROBEST: an efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression method for versatile gene function analyses in Arabidopsis seedlings

Plant Methods

Erh-Min Lai¹  Jen Sheen¹  Shu-Hsing Wu⁴  Chao-Ying Chen²  Wan-Ling Chiu³  Jing-Fen Wu⁴  Yi-Chieh Wang⁴  Kun-Hsiang Liu¹  Hung-Yi Wu² 

[1] Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA;Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan;Center for the Study of Biological Complexity, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA;Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan

关键词: Gain-of-function;    Innate immunity;    Gene expression;    Transient transformation;    Arabidopsis;    Agrobacterium;   

Others  :  802376
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-4811-10-19

 received in 2014-03-07, accepted in 2014-05-28,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Transient gene expression via Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer offers a simple and fast method to analyze transgene functions. Although Arabidopsis is the most-studied model plant with powerful genetic and genomic resources, achieving highly efficient and consistent transient expression for gene function analysis in Arabidopsis remains challenging.

Results

We developed a highly efficient and robust Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression system, named AGROBEST (Agrobacterium-mediated enhanced seedling transformation), which achieves versatile analysis of diverse gene functions in intact Arabidopsis seedlings. Using β-glucuronidase (GUS) as a reporter for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation assay, we show that the use of a specific disarmed Agrobacterium strain with vir gene pre-induction resulted in homogenous GUS staining in cotyledons of young Arabidopsis seedlings. Optimization with AB salts in plant culture medium buffered with acidic pH 5.5 during Agrobacterium infection greatly enhanced the transient expression levels, which were significantly higher than with two existing methods. Importantly, the optimized method conferred 100% infected seedlings with highly increased transient expression in shoots and also transformation events in roots of ~70% infected seedlings in both the immune receptor mutant efr-1 and wild-type Col-0 seedlings. Finally, we demonstrated the versatile applicability of the method for examining transcription factor action and circadian reporter-gene regulation as well as protein subcellular localization and protein–protein interactions in physiological contexts.

Conclusions

AGROBEST is a simple, fast, reliable, and robust transient expression system enabling high transient expression and transformation efficiency in Arabidopsis seedlings. Demonstration of the proof-of-concept experiments elevates the transient expression technology to the level of functional studies in Arabidopsis seedlings in addition to previous applications in fluorescent protein localization and protein–protein interaction studies. In addition, AGROBEST offers a new way to dissect the molecular mechanisms involved in Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Wu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Dandekar AM, Fisk HJ: Plant transformation: Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer. Methods Mol Biol 2005, 286:35-46.
• [2]Gelvin SB: Agricultural biotechnology: gene exchange by design. Nature 2005, 433:583-584.
• [3]Tzfira T, Citovsky V: Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of plants: biology and biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2006, 17:147-154.
• [4]Gelvin SB: Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: the biology behind the “gene-jockeying” tool. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2003, 67:16-37.
• [5]Gelvin SB: Plant proteins involved in Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2010, 48:45-68.
• [6]Gelvin SB: Traversing the cell: Agrobacterium T-DNA’s journey to the host genome. Front Plant Sci 2012, 3:52.
• [7]McCullen CA, Binns AN: Agrobacterium tumefaciens and plant cell interactions and activities required for interkingdom macromolecular transfer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2006, 22:101-127.
• [8]Fronzes R, Christie PJ, Waksman G: The structural biology of type IV secretion systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 2009, 7:703-714.
• [9]Brencic A, Angert ER, Winans SC: Unwounded plants elicit Agrobacterium vir gene induction and T-DNA transfer: transformed plant cells produce opines yet are tumour free. Mol Microbiol 2005, 57:1522-1531.
• [10]Clough SJ, Bent AF: Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 1998, 16:735-743.
• [11]Escudero J, Hohn B: Transfer and integration of T-DNA without cell injury in the host plant. Plant Cell 1997, 9:2135-2142.
• [12]Narasimhulu SB, Deng XB, Sarria R, Gelvin SB: Early transcription of Agrobacterium T-DNA genes in tobacco and maize. Plant Cell 1996, 8:873-886.
• [13]Ryu CM, Anand A, Kang L, Mysore KS: Agrodrench: a novel and effective agroinoculation method for virus-induced gene silencing in roots and diverse Solanaceous species. Plant J 2004, 40:322-331.
• [14]Mysore KS, Kumar CT, Gelvin SB: Arabidopsis ecotypes and mutants that are recalcitrant to Agrobacterium root transformation are susceptible to germ-line transformation. Plant J 2000, 21:9-16.
• [15]Sheen J: Signal transduction in maize and Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts. Plant Physiol 2001, 127:1466-1475.
• [16]Yoo SD, Cho YH, Sheen J: Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat Protoc 2007, 2:1565-1572.
• [17]Vaghchhipawala Z, Rojas CM, Senthil-Kumar M, Mysore KS: Agroinoculation and agroinfiltration: simple tools for complex gene function analyses. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 678:65-76.
• [18]Kim J, Somers DE: Rapid assessment of gene function in the circadian clock using artificial microRNA in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts. Plant Physiol 2010, 154:611-621.
• [19]Li JF, Chung HS, Niu Y, Bush J, McCormack M, Sheen J: Comprehensive protein-based artificial microRNA screens for effective gene silencing in plants. Plant Cell 2013, 25:1507-1522.
• [20]Kapila J, De Rycke R, Van Montagu M, Angenon G: An Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression system for intact leaves. Plant Sci 1997, 122:101-108.
• [21]Sheludko YV, Sindarovska YR, Gerasymenko IM, Bannikova MA, Kuchuk NV: Comparison of several Nicotiana species as hosts for high-scale Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007, 96:608-614.
• [22]Tsuda K, Qi Y, Nguyen LV, Bethke G, Tsuda Y, Glazebrook J, Katagiri F: An efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation of Arabidopsis. Plant J 2012, 69:713-719.
• [23]Wroblewski T, Tomczak A, Michelmore R: Optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated transient assays of gene expression in lettuce, tomato and Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnol J 2005, 3:259-273.
• [24]Zipfel C, Kunze G, Chinchilla D, Caniard A, Jones JD, Boller T, Felix G: Perception of the bacterial PAMP EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Cell 2006, 125:749-760.
• [25]Kim MJ, Baek K, Park CM: Optimization of conditions for transient Agrobacterium-mediated gene expression assays in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep 2009, 28:1159-1167.
• [26]Li JF, Park E, von Arnim AG, Nebenfuhr A: The FAST technique: a simplified Agrobacterium-based transformation method for transient gene expression analysis in seedlings of Arabidopsis and other plant species. Plant Methods 2009, 5:6.
• [27]Marion J, Bach L, Bellec Y, Meyer C, Gissot L, Faure JD: Systematic analysis of protein subcellular localization and interaction using high-throughput transient transformation of Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J 2008, 56:169-179.
• [28]Boller T, Felix G: A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2009, 60:379-406.
• [29]Tena G, Boudsocq M, Sheen J: Protein kinase signaling networks in plant innate immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2011, 14:519-529.
• [30]Segonzac C, Zipfel C: Activation of plant pattern-recognition receptors by bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 2011, 14:54-61.
• [31]Deblaere R, Bytebier B, De Greve H, Deboeck F, Schell J, Van Montagu M, Leemans J: Efficient octopine Ti plasmid-derived vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer to plants. Nucleic Acids Res 1985, 13:4777-4788.
• [32]Hamilton CM: A binary-BAC system for plant transformation with high-molecular-weight DNA. Gene 1997, 200:107-116.
• [33]Zipfel C, Robatzek S, Navarro L, Oakeley EJ, Jones JD, Felix G, Boller T: Bacterial disease resistance in Arabidopsis through flagellin perception. Nature 2004, 428:764-767.
• [34]Bauer Z, Gomez-Gomez L, Boller T, Felix G: Sensitivity of different ecotypes and mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana toward the bacterial elicitor flagellin correlates with the presence of receptor-binding sites. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:45669-45676.
• [35]Felix G, Duran JD, Volko S, Boller T: Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain of bacterial flagellin. Plant J 1999, 18:265-276.
• [36]Gelvin SB: Agrobacterium virulence gene induction. Methods Mol Biol 2006, 343:77-84.
• [37]Lai EM, Kado CI: Processed VirB2 is the major subunit of the promiscuous pilus of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 1998, 180:2711-2717.
• [38]Koncz C, Schell J: The promoter of TL-DNA gene 5 controls the tissue-specific expression of chimaeric genes carried by a novel type of Agrobacterium binary vector. Mol Genet Genomics 1986, 204:383-396.
• [39]Berger BR, Christie PJ: The Agrobacterium tumefaciens virB4 gene product is an essential virulence protein requiring an intact nucleoside triphosphate-binding domain. J Bacteriol 1993, 175:1723-1734.
• [40]Shan L, He P, Li J, Heese A, Peck SC, Nurnberger T, Martin GB, Sheen J: Bacterial effectors target the common signaling partner BAK1 to disrupt multiple MAMP receptor-signaling complexes and impede plant immunity. Cell Host Microbe 2008, 4:17-27.
• [41]Chen CC, Liang CS, Kao AL, Yang CC: HHP1, a novel signalling component in the cross-talk between the cold and osmotic signalling pathways in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 2010, 61:3305-3320.
• [42]Michael TP, Mockler TC, Breton G, McEntee C, Byer A, Trout JD, Hazen SP, Shen R, Priest HD, Sullivan CM, Givan SA, Yanovsky M, Hong F, Kay SA, Chory J: Network discovery pipeline elucidates conserved time-of-day-specific cis-regulatory modules. PLoS Genet 2008, 4:e14.
• [43]Wang Y, Wu JF, Nakamichi N, Sakakibara H, Nam HG, Wu SH: LIGHT-REGULATED WD1 and PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR9 form a positive feedback regulatory loop in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 2011, 23:486-498.
• [44]Borevitz JO, Xia Y, Blount J, Dixon RA, Lamb C: Activation tagging identifies a conserved MYB regulator of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2000, 12:2383-2394.
• [45]Lacombe S, Rougon-Cardoso A, Sherwood E, Peeters N, Dahlbeck D, van Esse HP, Smoker M, Rallapalli G, Thomma BP, Staskawicz B, Jones JD, Zipfel C: Interfamily transfer of a plant pattern-recognition receptor confers broad-spectrum bacterial resistance. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28:365-369.
• [46]Yi H, Mysore KS, Gelvin SB: Expression of the Arabidopsis histone H2A-1 gene correlates with susceptibility to Agrobacterium transformation. Plant J 2002, 32:285-298.
• [47]Ranf S, Eschen-Lippold L, Pecher P, Lee J, Scheel D: Interplay between calcium signalling and early signalling elements during defence responses to microbe- or damage-associated molecular patterns. Plant J 2011, 68:100-113.
• [48]Millet YA, Danna CH, Clay NK, Songnuan W, Simon MD, Werck-Reichhart D, Ausubel FM: Innate immune responses activated in Arabidopsis roots by microbe-associated molecular patterns. Plant Cell 2010, 22:973-990.
• [49]Willmann R, Lajunen HM, Erbs G, Newman M-A, Kolb D, Tsuda K, Katagiri F, Fliegmann J, Bono J-J, Cullimore JV, Jehle AK, Götz F, Kulik A, Molinaro A, Lipka V, Gust AA, Nürnberger T: Arabidopsis lysin-motif proteins LYM1 LYM3 CERK1 mediate bacterial peptidoglycan sensing and immunity to bacterial infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:19824-19829.
• [50]Dow M, Newman MA, von Roepenack E: The induction and modulation of plant defense responses by bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2000, 38:241-261.
• [51]He P, Shan L, Lin NC, Martin GB, Kemmerling B, Nurnberger T, Sheen J: Specific bacterial suppressors of MAMP signaling upstream of MAPKKK in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Cell 2006, 125:563-575.
• [52]Hellens R, Mullineaux P, Klee H: Technical focus:a guide to Agrobacterium binary Ti vectors. Trends Plant Sci 2000, 5:446-451.
• [53]Van Larebeke N, Engler G, Holsters M, Van den Elsacker S, Zaenen I, Schilperoort RA, Schell J: Large plasmid in Agrobacterium tumefaciens essential for crown gall-inducing ability. Nature 1974, 252:169-170.
• [54]Burch-Smith TM, Schiff M, Liu Y, Dinesh-Kumar SP: Efficient virus-induced gene silencing in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2006, 142:21-27.
• [55]Jackson AO, Larkins BA: Influence of ionic strength, pH, and chelation of divalent metals on isolation of polyribosomes from tobacco leaves. Plant Physiol 1976, 57:5-10.
• [56]Kim K-W, Franceschi V, Davin L, Lewis N: β-Glucuronidase as reporter gene. In Methods in Molecular Biology, Arabidopsis Protocols. Volume 323. Edited by Salinas J, Sanchez-Serrano J. Totowa, New Jersey, USA: Humana Press; 2006:263-273.
• [57]Lange H, Shropshire W, Mohr H: An analysis of phytochrome-mediated anthocyanin synthesis. Plant Physiol 1971, 47:649-655.