期刊论文详细信息
Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Development of guidelines for the surveillance of invasive mosquitoes in Europe
Laurence Marrama Rakotoarivony2  Hervé Zeller2  Ernst-Jan Scholte4  Dušan Petrić3  Romeo Bellini5  Francis Schaffner1 
[1] Avia-GIS, Risschotlei 33, B-2980 Zoersel, Belgium;ECDC, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Tomtebodavägen 11A, 17183 Stockholm, Sweden;University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture, Laboratory for Medical Entomology, Trg D. Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia;National Centre for Monitoring of Vectors, Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA), Geertjesweg 15, P.O. Box 9102, 6700, HC Wageningen, The Netherlands;Centro Agricoltura Ambiente “G. Nicoli”, Via Argini Nord 3351, 40014 Crevalcore, Italy
关键词: Guidelines;    Europe;    Chikungunya;    Dengue;    Vector;    Monitoring;    Surveillance;    Aedes;    Invasive mosquitoes;   
Others  :  1225335
DOI  :  10.1186/1756-3305-6-209
 received in 2013-04-15, accepted in 2013-07-13,  发布年份 2013
【 摘 要 】

Background

The recent notifications of autochthonous cases of dengue and chikungunya in Europe prove that the region is vulnerable to these diseases in areas where known mosquito vectors (Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti) are present. Strengthening surveillance of these species as well as other invasive container-breeding aedine mosquito species such as Aedes atropalpus, Aedes japonicus, Aedes koreicus and Aedes triseriatus is therefore required. In order to support and harmonize surveillance activities in Europe, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) launched the production of ‘Guidelines for the surveillance of invasive mosquitoes in Europe’. This article describes these guidelines in the context of the key issues surrounding invasive mosquitoes surveillance in Europe.

Methods

Based on an open call for tender, ECDC granted a pan-European expert team to write the guidelines draft. It content is founded on published and grey literature, contractor’s expert knowledge, as well as appropriate field missions. Entomologists, public health experts and end users from 17 EU/EEA and neighbouring countries contributed to a reviewing and validation process. The final version of the guidelines was edited by ECDC (Additional file 1).

Results

The guidelines describe all procedures to be applied for the surveillance of invasive mosquito species. The first part addresses strategic issues and options to be taken by the stakeholders for the decision-making process, according to the aim and scope of surveillance, its organisation and management. As the strategy to be developed needs to be adapted to the local situation, three likely scenarios are proposed. The second part addresses all operational issues and suggests options for the activities to be implemented, i.e. key procedures for field surveillance of invasive mosquito species, methods of identification of these mosquitoes, key and optional procedures for field collection of population parameters, pathogen screening, and environmental parameters. In addition, methods for data management and analysis are recommended, as well as strategies for data dissemination and mapping. Finally, the third part provides information and support for cost estimates of the planned programmes and for the evaluation of the applied surveillance process.

Conclusion

The ‘Guidelines for the surveillance of invasive mosquitoes in Europe’ aim at supporting the implementation of tailored surveillance of invasive mosquito species of public health importance. They are intended to provide support to professionals involved in mosquito surveillance or control, decision/policy makers, stakeholders in public health and non-experts in mosquito surveillance. Surveillance also aims to support control of mosquito-borne diseases, including integrated vector control, and the guidelines are therefore part of a tool set for managing mosquito-borne disease risk in Europe.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Schaffner et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

附件列表
Files Size Format View
Figure 5. 113KB Image download
Figure 4. 95KB Image download
Figure 3. 150KB Image download
Figure 2. 100KB Image download
Figure 1. 80KB Image download
Figure 5. 113KB Image download
Figure 4. 95KB Image download
Figure 3. 150KB Image download
Figure 2. 100KB Image download
Figure 1. 80KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC): Consultation on mosquito-borne disease transmission risk in Europe. Paris, 26 November 2010. Stockholm: ECDC; 2011. [ECDC Meeting Report] http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/1102_MER_Consultation_on_%20mosquito-borne_diseases.pdf webcite
  • [2]Angelini R, Finarelli AC, Angelini P, Po C, Petropulacos K, Silvi G, Macini P, Fortuna C, Venturi G, Magurano F, Fiorentini C, Marchi A, Benedetti E, Bucci P, Boros S, Romi R, Majori G, Ciufolini MG, Nicoletti L, Rezza G, Cassone A: Chikungunya in north-eastern Italy: a summing up of the outbreak. Euro Surveill 2007, 12(47):3313.
  • [3]Grandadam M, Caro V, Plumet S, Thiberge JM, Souares Y, Failloux AB, Tolou HJ, Budelot M, Cosserat D, Leparc-Goffart I, Despres P: Chikungunya virus, southeastern France. Emerg Infect Dis 2011, 17(5):910-913.
  • [4]La Ruche G, Souares Y, Armengaud A, Peloux-Petiot F, Delaunay P, Despres P, Lenglet A, Jourdain F, Leparc-Goffart I, Charlet F, Ollier L, Mantey K, Mollet T, Fournier JP, Torrents R, Leitmeyer K, Hilairet P, Zeller H, Van Bortel W, Dejour-Salamanca D, Grandadam M, Gastellu-Etchegorry M: First two autochthonous dengue virus infections in metropolitan France, September 2010. Euro Surveill 2010, 15(39):19676.
  • [5]Gjenero-Margan I, Aleraj B, Krajcar D, Lesnikar V, Klobucar A, Pem-Novosel I, Kurecic-Filipovic S, Komparak S, Martic R, Duricic S, Betica-Radic L, Okmadzic J, Vilibic-Cavlek T, Babic-Erceg A, Turkovic B, Avsic-Zupanc T, Radic I, Ljubic M, Sarac K, Benic N, Mlinaric-Galinovic G: Autochthonous dengue fever in Croatia, August-September 2010. Euro Surveill 2011, 16(9):19805.
  • [6]Sousa CA, Clairouin M, Seixas G, Viveiros B, Novo MT, Silva AC, Escoval MT, Economopoulou A: Ongoing outbreak of dengue type 1 in the Autonomous Region of Madeira, Portugal: preliminary report. Euro Surveill 2012, 17(49):20333.
  • [7]Hales S, De Wet N, Maindonald J, Woodward A: Potential effect of population and climate changes on global distribution of dengue fever: An empirical model. Lancet 2002, 360(9336):830-834.
  • [8]Vanwambeke SO, Lambin EF: Environmental change and vector-borne diseases: The contribution of remote sensing and spatial analyses, Vol. 1. In Geographic Medicine, Oxford: Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO. Edited by Verhasselt YLG. Oxford, UK: Eolss Publishers; 2006:202-218. http://www.eolss.net webcite
  • [9]Gould EA, Higgs S: Impact of climate change and other factors on emerging arbovirus diseases. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2009, 103(2):109-121.
  • [10]Straetemans M: ECDC consultation group on vector-related risk for chikungunya virus transmission in Europe: Vector-related risk mapping of the introduction and establishment of Aedes albopictus in Europe . Euro Surveill 2008, 13(7):8040.
  • [11]European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC): Expert consultation on guidelines for the surveillance of invasive mosquitoes. Stockholm, 8–9 December 2011. Stockholm: ECDC; 2012. [ECDC Meeting Report] http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/1203-MER-ECDC-Expert-consultation-on-mosquito-surveillance-guidelines.pdf webcite
  • [12]Reinert JF: New classification for the composite genus Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae: Aedini), elevation of subgenus Ochlerotatus to generic rank, reclassification of the other subgenera, and notes on certain subgenera and species. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2000, 16:175-188.
  • [13]Reinert JF, Harbach RE, Kitching IJ: Phylogeny and classification of Aedini (Diptera: Culicidae), based on morphological characters of all life stages. Zool J Linn Soc 2004, 142:289-368.
  • [14]Reinert JF, Harbach RE, Kitching IJ: Phylogeny and classification of Finlaya and allied taxa (Diptera : Culicidae : Aedini) based on morphological data from all life stages. Zool J Linn Soc 2006, 148(1):1-101.
  • [15]JME Editorial Board: Journal policy on names of Aedine mosquito genera and subgenera. J Med Entomol 2005, 42(4):511.
  • [16]Savage HM, Strickman D: The genus and subgenus categories within Culicidae and placement of Ochlerotatus as a subgenus of Aedes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2004, 20(2):208-214.
  • [17]Reinert JF, Harbach RE, Kitching IJ: Phylogeny and classification of tribe Aedini (Diptera: Culicidae). Zool J Linn Soc 2009, 157(4):700-794.
  • [18]Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Schaffner F, Versteirt V, Hendrickx G, Zeller H, Van Bortel W: A review of the invasive mosquitoes in Europe: ecology, public health risks, and control options. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2012, 12(6):435-447.
  • [19]European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC): West Nile virus infection maps – situation update. Stockholm: ECDC; http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/healthtopics/west_nile_fever/West-Nile-fever-maps/Pages/index.aspx webcite
  • [20]Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Brianti E, Traversa D, Petric D, Genchi C, Capelli G: Vector-borne helminths of dogs and humans in Europe. Parasit Vectors 2013, 6:16. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [21]Schaffner F: The mosquitoes and the community. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2003. [Local authorities, health and environment briefing pamphlets, no. 39]
  • [22]Schaffner F, Medlock JM, Van Bortel W: Public health significance of invasive mosquitoes in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013, 19:685-692.
  • [23]Schaffner F, Chouin S, Guilloteau J: First record of Ochlerotatus (Finlaya) japonicus japonicus (Theobald, 1901) in metropolitan France. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2003, 19(1):1-5.
  • [24]Soumahoro MK, Boelle PY, Gauzere BA, Atsou K, Pelat C, Lambert B, La Ruche G, Gastellu-Etchegorry M, Renault P, Sarazin M, Sarazin M, Yazdanpanah Y, Flahault A, Malvy D, Hanslik T: The Chikungunya epidemic on La Reunion Island in 2005–2006: a cost-of-illness study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2011, 5(6):e1197.
  • [25]Giovannini F, Mignani R: Controllo della Zanzara-Tigre: analisi dei costi sostenuti dagli Enti Locali, Contributi. vol. 73. Emilia-Romagna: Servizio Sanitario Regionale Emilia-Romagna; 2012:192.
  • [26]Juliano SA, Lounibos LP: Ecology of invasive mosquitoes: effects on resident species and on human health. Ecol Lett 2005, 8(5):558-574.
  • [27]Schaffner F, Kaufmann C, Hegglin D, Mathis A: The invasive mosquito Aedes japonicus in Central Europe. Med Vet Entomol 2009, 23(4):448-451.
  • [28]Scott TW, Takken W: Feeding strategies of anthropophilic mosquitoes result in increased risk of pathogen transmission. Trends Parasitol 2012, 28(3):114-121.
  • [29]Randolph SE, Rogers DJ: The arrival, establishment and spread of exotic diseases: patterns and predictions. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010, 8:361-371.
  • [30]Halstead SB: Dengue virus-mosquito interactions. Annu Rev Entomol 2008, 53:273-291.
  • [31]European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC): Development of Aedes albopictus risk maps . Stockholm: ECDC; 2009. [ECDC Technical Report] http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/0905_TER_Development_of_Aedes_Albopictus_Risk_Maps.pdf webcite
  • [32]European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC): The climatic suitability for dengue transmission in continental Europe. Stockholm: ECDC; 2012. [ECDC Technical Report] http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/TER-Climatic-suitablility-dengue.pdf webcite
  • [33]Caminade C, Medlock JM, Ducheyne E, McIntyre KM, Leach S, Baylis M, Morse AP: Suitability of European climate for the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus: recent trends and future scenarios. J R Soc Interface 2012, 9(75):2708-2717.
  • [34]Fischer D, Thomas SM, Niemitz F, Reineking B, Beierkuhnlein C: Projection of climatic suitability for Aedes albopictus Skuse (Culicidae) in Europe under climate change conditions. Glob Planet Change 2011, 78:54-64.
  • [35]Ooi EE, Gubler DJ: Global spread of epidemic dengue: the influence of environmental change. Future Virol 2009, 4(6):571-580.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:78次 浏览次数:31次