期刊论文详细信息
Radiation Oncology
Interobserver variability in the delineation of the tumour bed using seroma and surgical clips based on 4DCT scan for external-beam partial breast irradiation
Yanluan Guo2  Chaoqian Liang1  Yingjie Zhang1  Qian Shao1  Min Xu1  Wei Wang1  Jianbin Li1  Bing Guo2 
[1] Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jiyan Road, Jinan 250117, Shandong Province, China;Medicine and Life Sciences College of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China
关键词: Seroma;    Surgical clips;    Interobserver variability;    Four-dimensional computed tomography;    Breast cancer;   
Others  :  1139640
DOI  :  10.1186/s13014-015-0370-3
 received in 2014-10-14, accepted in 2015-02-25,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

To explore the interobserver variability in the delineation of the tumour bed using seroma and surgical clips based on the four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scan for external-beam partial breast irradiation (EB-PBI) during free breathing.

Methods

Patients with a seroma clarity score (SCS) 3 ~ 5 and ≥5 surgical clips in the lumpectomy cavity after breast-conserving surgery who were recruited for EB-PBI underwent 4DCT simulation. Based on the ten sets of 4DCT images acquired, the tumour bed formed using the clips, the seroma, and both the clips and seroma (defined as TBC, TBS and TBC+S, respectively) were delineated by five radiation oncologists using specific guidelines. The following parameters were calculated to analyse interobserver variability: volume of the tumour bed (TBC, TBS, TBC+S), coefficient of variation (COVC, COVS, COVC+S), and matching degree (MDC, MDS, MDC+S).

Results

The interobserver variability for TBC and TBC+S and for COVC and COVC+S were statistically significant (p = 0.021, 0.008, 0.002, 0.015). No significant difference was observed for TBS and COVS (p = 0.867, 0.061). Significant differences in interobserver variability were observed for MDC vs MDS, MDC vs MDC+S, MDS vs MDC+S (p = 0.000, 0.032, 0.008), the interobserver variability of MDS was smaller than that of MDC and MDC+S (MDS > MDC+S > MDC).

Conclusions

When the SCS was 3 ~ 5 points and the number of surgical clips was ≥5, interobserver variability was minimal for the delineation of the tumour bed based on seroma.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Guo et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150322081651223.pdf 1883KB PDF download
Figure 2. 83KB Image download
Figure 1. 47KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans E et al.. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 366:2087-106.
  • [2]Litiere S, Werutsky G, Fentiman IS, Rutgers E, Christiaens MR, Van Limbergen E et al.. Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I-II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13:412-9.
  • [3]Blichert-Toft M, Nielsen M, During M, Møller S, Rank F, Overgaard M et al.. Long-term results of breast conserving surgery vs. mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of the Danish randomized DBCG-82TM protocol. Acta Oncol. 2008; 47:672-81.
  • [4]Offersen BV, Overgaard M, Kroman N, Overgaard J. Accelerated partial breast irradiation as part of breast conserving therapy of early breast carcinoma: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2009; 90:1-13.
  • [5]Njeh CF, Saunders MW, Langton CM. Accelerated partial breast irradiation using external beam conformal radiation therapy: a review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012; 81:1-20.
  • [6]Kader HA, Truong PT, Pai R, Panades M, Jones S, Ansbacher W et al.. When is CT-based postoperative seroma most useful to plan partial breast radiotherapy? Evaluation of clinical factors affecting seroma volume and clarity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 72:1064-9.
  • [7]Kirby AM, Jena R, Harris EJ, Evans PM, Crowley C, Gregory DL et al.. Tumour bed delineation for partial breast/breast boost radiotherapy: what is the optimal number of implanted markers? Radiother Oncol. 2013; 106:231-5.
  • [8]Landis DM, Luo W, Song J, Bellon JR, Punglia RS, Wong JS et al.. Variability among breast radiation oncologists in the delineation of the postsurgical lumpectomy cavity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 67:1299-308.
  • [9]Dzhugashvili M, Tournay E, Pichenot C, Dunant A, Pessoa E, Khallel A et al.. 3D-conformal accelerated partial breast irradiation treatment planning: the value of surgical clips in the delineation of the lumpectomy cavity. Radiat Oncol. 2009; 4:70. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [10]Thureau S, Oden S, Mokaouim R, Mezzani-Saillard S, Clatot F, Hanzen C. Assessing the contribution of a standardized method in defining the tumor bed using surgical clips in breast cancer. Cancer Radiother. 2012; 16:100-6.
  • [11]Sharma R, Spierer M, Mutyala S, Thawani N, Cohen HW, Hong L et al.. Change in seroma volume during whole-breast radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 75:89-93.
  • [12]Shaikh T, Chen T, Khan A, Yue NJ, Kearney T, Cohler A et al.. Improvement in interobserver accuracy in delineation of the lumpectomy cavity using fiducial markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 78:1127-34.
  • [13]Ding Y, Li J, Wang W, Fan T, Xu M, Shao Q et al.. Displacement of the lumpectomy cavity defined by surgical clips and seroma based on 4D-CT scan for external-beam partial breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery: a comparative study. Br J Radiol. 2013; 86:20130416.
  • [14]Geets X, Daisne JF, Arcangeli S, Coche E, De Poel M, Duprez T et al.. Inter-observer variability in the delineation of pharyngo-laryngeal tumor, parotid glands and cervical spinal cord: comparison between CT-scan and MRI. Radiother Oncol. 2005; 77:25-31.
  • [15]Yang TJ, Tao R, Elkhuizen PH, van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C, Li G, Powell SN. Tumor bed delineation for external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2013; 108:181-9.
  • [16]van Mourik AM, Elkhuizen PH, Minkema D, Duppen JC, van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C. Multi-institutional study on target volume delineation variation in breast radiotherapy in the presence of guidelines. Radiother Oncol. 2010; 94:286-91.
  • [17]Yang Z, Chen J, Hu W, Pan Z, Cai G, Yu X et al.. Planning the breast boost: how accurately do surgical clips represent the CT seroma? Radiother Oncol. 2010; 97:530-4.
  • [18]Wong EK, Truong PT, Kader HA, Nichol AM, Salter L, Petersen R et al.. Consistency in seroma contouring for partial breast radiotherapy: impact of guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 66:372-6.
  • [19]Hurkmans CW, Borger JH, Pieters BR, Russell NS, Jansen EP, Mijnheer BJ. Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001; 50:1366-72.
  • [20]Dzhugashvili M, Pichenot C, Dunant A, Balleyguier C, Delaloge S, Mathieu MC et al.. Surgical clips assist in the visualization of the lumpectomy cavity in three-dimensional conformal accelerated partial-breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76:1320-4.
  • [21]Yang TJ, Minkema D, Elkhuizen PH, Heemsbergen W, van Mourik AM, van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C. Clinical applicability of cone-beam computed tomography in monitoring seroma volume change during breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 78:119-26.
  • [22]Cover KS, Lagerwaard FJ, Senan S. Color intensity projections: a rapid approach for evaluating four-dimensional CT scans in treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 64:954-61.
  • [23]Wang W, Li JB, Hu HG, Sun T, Xu M, Tan TY et al.. Evaluation of dosimetric variance in whole breast forward-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on 4DCT and 3DCT. J Radiat Res. 2013; 54:755-61.
  • [24]Liao ZW, Guan XX, Li FY, He ZY, Xue M, Huang XY et al.. Accelerated partial breast irradiation: use of four-dimensional CT for target localization and ssessment of intrafractional motion. Oncol Res. 2010; 18:503-7.
  • [25]Li XA, Tai A, Arthur DW, Buchholz TA, Macdonald S, Marks LB et al.. Variability of target and normal structure delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy: an RTOG Multi-Institutional and Multiobserver Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 73:944-51.
  • [26]Berrang TS, Truong PT, Popescu C, Drever L, Kader HA, Hilts ML et al.. 3D ultrasound can contribute to planning CT to define the target for partial breast radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 73:375-83.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:33次 浏览次数:30次