A scoping study of cultural interventions to treat addictions in Indigenous populations: methods, strategies and insights from a Two-Eyed Seeing approach

Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

Colleen Anne Dell⁶  Barbara Fornssler⁶  Christopher Mushquash⁴  Laura Hall⁶  Carol Hopkins³  Marwa Farag¹  David Mykota⁷  Beverley Shea²  Nancy Poole⁵  Margo Rowan⁶ 

[1] School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Road, Room 2705, RUH, Saskatoon S7N 5ES, SK, Canada;Bruyère Research Institute, 85 Primrose Avenue, Ottawa K1R 6 M1, ON, Canada;National Native Addictions Partnership Foundation Inc, Satellite Office 303 East River Road, Muncey, Ontario N0L 1Y0, Canada;Department of Psychology and Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Rd., Thunder Bay P7B 5E1, ON, Canada;British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health, E311-4500 Oak St, Box 48, Vancouver V6H 3 N1, BC, Canada;Department of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan, 1109 – 9 Campus Drive, Saskatoon S7N 5A5, SK, Canada;Department of Educational Psychology and Special Education, College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, 28 Campus Drive, Saskatoon S7N 0X1, SK, Canada

关键词: Two-Eyed Seeing;    Systematic review;    Scoping study;    Treatment interventions;    Indigenous;    Addictions;    Cultural interventions;    First Nations;   

Others  :  1223065
DOI  :  10.1186/s13011-015-0021-6

 received in 2015-02-04, accepted in 2015-06-25,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

This paper describes the methods, strategies and insights gained from a scoping study using a “Two-Eyed Seeing” approach. An evolving technique, Two-Eyed Seeing respects and integrates the strengths of Indigenous knowledge and Western sciences, often “weaving back and forth” between the two worldviews. The scoping study was used to inform a tool for measuring the impact of culturally based addictions treatment services on wellness in Indigenous populations. It formed part of a three-year study, Honouring Our Strengths: Indigenous Culture as Intervention in Addictions Treatment. The scoping study identified and mapped literature on cultural interventions in addictions treatment, and described the nature, extent and gaps in literature.

Methods

Using a Two-Eyed Seeing approach, we adapted, applied and enhanced a common framework of scoping studies. In the end stage of the scoping review process, an Ad Hoc Review Group, led by our project Elder, reviewed and interpreted Indigenous and Western understandings within the mapped information. Elements of the scoping study were joined with results from community focus groups with staff at treatment centres.

Results

Two-Eyed Seeing contributed differently at each stage of the scoping study. In early stages, it clarified team expertise and potential contributions. At the mid-point, it influenced our shift from a systematic to a scoping review. Near the end, it incorporated Western and Indigenous knowledge to interpret and synthesize evidence from multiple sources.

Conclusions

This paper adds to the collective work on augmenting the methodology of scoping studies. Despite the challenges of a Two-Eyed Seeing approach, it enables researchers using scoping studies to develop knowledge that is better able to translate into meaningful findings for Indigenous communities.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Rowan et al.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Institute of Aboriginal Peoples’ Health. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/45351.html (2012). Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
• [2]Iwama M, Marshall M, Marshall A, Bartlett C. Two-eyed seeing and the language of healing in community-based research. Can J Native Educ. 2009; 32:3-23.
• [3]Bartlett C, Marshall M, Marshall A. Two-eyed seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together Indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing. J Env Stud Sci. 2012; 2:331-40.
• [4]Evering B. Relationships between knowledge (s): implications for knowledge generation’. J Env Stud Sci. 2012; 2:357-68.
• [5]Hatcher A, Bartlett C, Marshall A, Marshall M. Two-eyed seeing in the classroom environment: concepts, approaches and challenges. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ. 2009; 9:141-53.
• [6]Wiber M, Kearney J. Learning communities as a tool in natural resource management: proceedings of a workshop held in Halifax, Nova Scotia. 2006. http://www.integrativescience.ca/uploads/articles/2005November-Bartlett-text-Integrative-Science-Two-Eyed-Seeing-Aboriginal-learning-communities.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2014.
• [7]Lewthwaite B, Renaud R. Pilimmaksarniq: working together for the common good in science curriculum development and delivery in Nunavut. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ. 2009; 9:154-72.
• [8]Martin DH. Two-eyed seeing: a framework for understanding Indigenous and non-Indigenous approaches to Indigenous health research. Can J Nurs Res. 2012; 44:20-42.
• [9]Castellano MB. Updating Aboriginal traditions of knowledge. In: Indigenous knowledges in global contexts: multiple readings of our world. Hall BL, Dei GJS, Rosenberg DG, editors. University of Toronto Press, Toronto; 2000: p.21-36.
• [10]Fornssler B, McKenzie HA, Dell CA, Laliberte L, Hopkins C. “I got to know them in a new way”: rela (y/t) ing rhizomes and community-based knowledge (brokers’) transformation of western and Indigenous knowledge. Cult Stud Crit Methodol. 2014; 14:179-93.
• [11]Institute of Health Economics. Aboriginal peoples’ wellness in Canada: scaling up the knowledge. Canadian Institute of Aboriginal Peoples’ Health. 2011. http://www.ihe.ca/documents/Aboriginal%20Roundtable%20Report.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2014.
• [12]Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2005; 8:19-32.
• [13]Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010; 5:59-67. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]Valaitis R, Martin-Misener R, Wong ST, MacDonald M, Meagher-Stewart D, Austin P et al.. Methods, strategies and technologies used to conduct a scoping literature review of collaboration between primary care and public health. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2012; 13:219-36.
• [15]Daudt HML, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:48-56. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Rowan M, Poole N, Shea B, Gone JP, Mykota D, Farag M et al.. Cultural interventions to treat addictions in Indigenous populations: findings from a scoping study. Subst Abuse Treat Pr. 2014; 9:34-59. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]O’Connor D, Green S, Higgins JPT. Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. John Wiley & Sons, Mississauga; 2008: p.83-94.
• [18]Ermine W. The ethical space of engagement. ILJ. 2007; 6:193-203.
• [19]Ermine W, Sinclair R, Jeffery B. The ethics of research involving Indigenous peoples. Indigenous Peoples’ Health Research Centre. 2004. http://ahrnets.ca/files/2010/05/ethics_review_iphrc.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
• [20]Mila-Schaaf K, Hudson M. Negotiating space for Indigenous theorising in Pacific mental health and addictions. Le Va. 2009. http://www.leva.co.nz/library/leva/negotiating-space-for-indigenous-theorising-in-pacific-mental-health-and-addictions. Accessed 6 Oct 2014.
• [21]Foale S. The intersection of scientific and Indigenous ecological knowledge in coastal Melanesia: implications for contemporary marine resource management. Int Soc Sci J. 2006; 58:129-37.
• [22]Bennett LM, Gadlin H, Levine-Finley S. Collaboration and team science: a field guide. National Institutes of Health Research. 2010. http://research.uiowa.edu/team-science-building-successful-research-collaborations. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
• [23]Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor BK, Moser RP. The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35 Suppl 2:77-89.
• [24]Hibbert P, Sillince J, Diefenbach T, Cunliffe AL. Relationally reflexive practice: a generative approach to theory development in qualitative research. Organ Res Meth. 2014; 17:278-98.
• [25]Hopkins C, Dumont J, Deleary M, Virgil T. Phase I: Culture as Intervention Research Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan. 2012.
• [26]Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012; 22:1435-43.
• [27]McGowan J, Sampson M, Lefebvre C. An evidence-based checklist for the peer review of electronic search strategies (PRESS EBC). EBLIP. 2010; 5:149-54.
• [28]Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM, Merchant WR. Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. WORK. 2010; 35:399-404.
• [29]Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009; 26:91-108.
• [30]Grimshaw J. A knowledge synthesis chapter. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. 2010. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/knowledge_synthesis_chapter_e.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2014.
• [31]Bassett R, McGibbon E. A critical participatory and collaborative method for scoping the literature. Qual Quant. 2013; 47:3249-59.
• [32]Institute for Integrative Science and Health.Knowledge Gardening. http://www.integrativescience.ca/ 15 Oct 2014.
• [33]First Nations Information Governance Centre. The first nations principles of OCAP™. http://fnigc.ca/ocap.html (2013). Accessed 15 Oct 2014.