期刊论文详细信息
Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Spatio-temporal prevalence of porcine cysticercosis in Madagascar based on meat inspection
Eric Cardinale4  Ronan Jambou1  Claire Bernard4  Ony Rasamoelina2  Andriatsilavina Rakotoarimanana2  Harentsoaniaina Rasamoelina-Andriamanivo2  Vincent Porphyre3 
[1] Institut Pasteur, Paris, France;Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar;CIRAD, UMR112 SELMET, Saint Pierre, La Réunion, France;CRVOI, Ste Clotilde, La Réunion, France
关键词: Madagascar;    Food safety;    Meat inspection;    Slaughterhouse;    Epidemiology;    Pig;    Cysticercosis;   
Others  :  1222172
DOI  :  10.1186/s13071-015-0975-2
 received in 2015-01-12, accepted in 2015-06-30,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Taenia solium cysticercosis is a parasitic meat-borne disease that is highly prevalent in pigs and humans in Africa, but the burden is vastly underestimated due to the lack of official control along the pork commodity chain, which hampers long-term control policies.

Methods

The apparent and corrected prevalences of T. solium cysticercosis were investigated in pork carcasses slaughtered and retailed in Antananarivo (Madagascar), thanks to a 12-month monitoring plan in two urban abattoirs.

Results

Overall apparent prevalence was estimated at 4.6 % [4.2 – 5.0 %]. The corrected overall prevalence defined as the estimated prevalence after accounting for the sensitivity of meat inspection was 21.03 % [19.18- 22.87 %]. Significant differences among geoclimatic regions were observed only for indigenous pigs, with an apparent prevalence estimated at 7.9 % [6.0 – 9.9 %] in the northern and western regions, 7.3 % [6.0 – 8.6 %] in the central region, and 6.2 % [4.7 – 7.8 %] in the southern region. In the central region, where both exotic and indigenous pigs were surveyed, indigenous pigs were 8.5 times [6.7 – 10.7] more likely to be infected than exotic improved pigs. Urban consumers were more likely to encounter cysticercosis in pork in the rainy season, which is a major at risk period, in particular in December. Differences between abattoirs were also identified.

Conclusion

Our results underline the need for improved surveillance and control programmes to limit T. solium cysticercosis in carcasses by introducing a risk-based meat inspection procedure that accounts for the origin and breed of the pigs, and the season.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Porphyre et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150805095432913.pdf 953KB PDF download
Fig. 2. 69KB Image download
Fig. 1. 55KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Maurice J. Of pigs and people? WHO prepares to battle cysticercosis. Lancet. 2014; 384:571-572.
  • [2]Rasamoelina-Andriamanivo H, Porphyre V, Jambou R. Control of cysticercosis in Madagascar: beware of the pitfalls. Trends Parasitol. 2013; 29:538-547.
  • [3]Andriantsimahavandy A, Ravaoalimalala VE, Rajaonarison P, Ravoniarimbinina P, Rakotondrazaka M, Raharilaza N et al.. Situation épidémiologique actuelle de la cysticercose à Madagascar. Arch Inst Pasteur de Madagascar. 2003; 69:46-51.
  • [4]Michelet L, Carod J-F, Rakotondrazaka M, Ma L, Gay F, Dauga C. The pig tapeworm Taenia solium, the cause of cysticercosis: Biogeographic (temporal and spacial) origins in Madagascar. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010; 55:744-750.
  • [5]Costard S, Porphyre V, Messad S, Rakotondrahanta S, Vidon H, Roger F et al.. Multivariate analysis of management and biosecurity practices in smallholder pig farms in Madagascar. Prev Vet Med. 2009; 92:199-209.
  • [6]Goussanou S, Kpodekon T, Saegerman C, Azagoun E, Youssao A, Farougou S et al.. Spatial distribution and risks factors of porcine cysticercosis in southern Benin based meat inspection records. Int J Microbiol Res. 2013; 4:188-196.
  • [7]Phiri IK, Dorny P, Gabriel S, Willingham Iii AL, Speybroeck N, Vercruysse J. The prevalence of porcine cysticercosis in Eastern and Southern provinces of Zambia. Vet Parasitol. 2002; 108:31-39.
  • [8]Phiri IK, Dorny P, Gabriel S, Willingham AL, Sikasunge C, Siziya S et al.. Assessment of routine inspection methods for porcine cysticercosis in Zambian village pigs. J Helminthol. 2006; 80:69-72.
  • [9]Boa ME, Kassuku AA, Willingham Iii AL, Keyyu JD, Phiri IK, Nansen P. Distribution and density of cysticerci of Taenia solium by muscle groups and organs in naturally infected local finished pigs in Tanzania. Vet Parasitol. 2002; 106:155-164.
  • [10]Rakotoharinome M, Randriamparany T, Pognon D, Chane Ming J, Idoumbin JP, Cardinale E et al.. Prevalence of antimicrobial residues in pork meat in Madagascar. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2014; 46:49-55.
  • [11]Porphyre V, Rakotoharinome M, Pognon D, Randriamparany T, Prévost S, Le Bizec B. Residues of medroxyprogesterone acetate detected in sows at slaughterhouse, Madagascar. Food Addit Contam Part A. 2013; 30:2108-2113.
  • [12]Dupuy C, Morlot C, Gilot-Fromont E, Mas M, Grandmontagne C, Gilli-Dunoyer P et al.. Prevalence of Taenia saginata cysticercosis in French cattle in 2010. Vet Parasitol. 2014; 203:65-72.
  • [13]Dorny P, Phiri IK, Vercruysse J, Gabriel S, Willingham Iii AL, Brandt J et al.. A Bayesian approach for estimating values for prevalence and diagnostic test characteristics of porcine cysticercosis. Int J Parasit. 2004; 34:569-576.
  • [14]Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.
  • [15]Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE T Automat Contr. 1974; 19:716-723.
  • [16]Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York; 2000.
  • [17]R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In http://www.r-project.org/; Vienna. 2008.
  • [18]Development team: QGIS Geographic Information System (Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project). 2012.
  • [19]Porphyre V, Betson M, Rabezanahary H, Mboussou Y, Zafindraibe NJ, Andriamanivo H, et al. Taenia solium porcine cysticercosis in Madagascar: comparison of immuno-diagnostic techniques and estimation of the prevalence in pork carcasses traded in Antananarivo city (accepted). Vet Parasitol. 2015, X:XXX-XXX.
  • [20]Gweba M, Faleke OO, Junaidu AU, Fabiyi JP, Fajinmi AO. Some risk factors for Taenia solium cysticercosis in semi-intensively raised pigs in Zuru, Nigeria. Vet Ital. 2010; 46:57-67.
  • [21]Assana E, Zoli A, Sadou HA, Nguekam, Vondou L, Pouedet MSR, et al. Prevalence of porcine cysticercosis in Mayo-Danay (North Cameroon) and Mayo-Kebbi (Southwest Chad) [French]. Revue Elev Méd vét Pays Trop. 2001, 54:123-127.
  • [22]Mohan VR, Tharmalingam J, Muliyil J, Oommen A, Dorny P, Vercruysse J et al.. Prevalence of porcine cysticercosis in Vellore, South India. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2013; 107:62-64.
  • [23]Sikasunge CS, Phiri IK, Phiri AM, Dorny P, Siziya S, Willingham Iii AL. Risk factors associated with porcine cysticercosis in selected districts of Eastern and Southern provinces of Zambia. Vet Parasitol. 2007; 143:59-66.
  • [24]Sikasunge CS, Phiri IK, Phiri AM, Siziya S, Dorny P, Willingham Iii AL. Prevalence of Taenia solium porcine cysticercosis in the Eastern, Southern and Western provinces of Zambia. Vet J. 2008; 176:240-244.
  • [25]Krecek RC, Mohammed H, Michael LM, Schantz PM, Ntanjana L, Morey L et al.. Risk factors of porcine cysticercosis in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e37718.
  • [26]Madec F, Hurnik D, Porphyre V, Cardinale E. Good practices for biosecurity in the pig sector – Issues and options in developing and transition countries. Rome: FAO; 2010, 74. http://www. fao.org/3/a-i1435e.pdf webcite
  • [27]Braae U, Magnussen P, Lekule F, Harrison W, Johansen M. Temporal fluctuations in the sero-prevalence of Taenia solium cysticercosis in pigs in Mbeya Region, Tanzania. Parasit Vectors. 2014, 7.
  • [28]Ganaba R, Praet N, Carabin H, Millogo A, Tarnagda Z, Dorny P et al.. Factors associated with the prevalence of circulating antigens to porcine cysticercosis in three villages of Burkina Faso. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011; 5:e927.
  • [29]Praet N, Kanobana K, Kabwe C, Maketa V, Lukanu P, Lutumba P et al.. Taenia solium cysticercosis in the Democratic Republic of Congo: how does pork trade affect the transmission of the parasite? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010; 4:e817-7.
  • [30]da Silva MRM, Uyhara CNS, Silva FH, Espindola NM, Poleti MD, Vaz AJ et al.. Cysticercosis in experimentally and naturally infected pigs: parasitological and immunological diagnosis. Pesquisa Vet Brasil. 2012; 32:297-302.
  • [31]Dupuy C, Morignat E, Maugey X, Vinard J-L, Hendrikx P, Ducrot C et al.. Defining syndromes using cattle meat inspection data for syndromic surveillance purposes: a statistical approach with the 2005-2010 data from ten French slaughterhouses. BMC Vet Res. 2013; 9:88. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [32]Nsadha Z, Kawuma P, Doble L, Kivali V, Ojok FEL, Nasinyama G et al.. Diagnostic efficiency of meat inspection service to detect Taenia solium cysticercostic pork at Wambizi pig abattoir, Kampala, Uganda: Implications for public health. Biomed Sci. 2014; 8:17-22.
  • [33]INSTAT Madagascar: Human population census in Madagascar 1993-2011. . In Book Human population census in Madagascar 1993-2011. (Editor ed.^eds.). City; 2011. http://www. [http://www.instat.mg] webciteinstat.mg webcite
  • [34]Ramamaonjisoa S, Randrianasolo SA, Rafolo R. Etude des aspects socioculturels de l'extension et de la consommation du porc à Madagascar. In Book Etude des aspects socioculturels de l'extension et de la consommation du porc à Madagascar (Editor ed.^eds.). pp. 168. City: Comité de coordination des deuxièmes journées de la filière porcine de l'Océan Indien; 1998:168.
  • [35]Andriamparany HM. Evaluation des impacts économiques des maladies porcines importantes à Madagascar. Faculté de Médecine. Université d’Antananarivo, Thèse de Médecine Vétérinaire; Antananarivo, Madagascar 2012.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:27次 浏览次数:32次