Evaluation of Swiss slaughterhouse data for integration in a syndromic surveillance system

BMC Veterinary Research

Martin Reist¹  Flavie Vial² 

[1] Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office, Liebefeld, Switzerland;Veterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Liebefeld, Switzerland

关键词: Early detection;    Syndromic surveillance;    Slaughterhouse;    Meat inspection;    Post-mortem;    Carcass condemnation;   

Others  :  1119337
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-6148-10-33

 received in 2013-11-14, accepted in 2014-01-27,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

We evaluated Swiss slaughterhouse data for integration in a national syndromic surveillance system for the early detection of emerging diseases in production animals. We analysed meat inspection data for cattle, pigs and small ruminants slaughtered between 2007 and 2012 (including emergency slaughters of sick/injured animals); investigating patterns in the number of animals slaughtered and condemned; the reasons invoked for whole carcass condemnations; reporting biases and regional effects.

Results

Whole carcass condemnation rates were fairly uniform (1–2‰) over time and between the different types of production animals. Condemnation rates were much higher and less uniform following emergency slaughters. The number of condemnations peaked in December for both cattle and pigs, a time when individuals of lower quality are sent to slaughter when hay and food are limited and when certain diseases are more prevalent. Each type of production animal was associated with a different profile of condemnation reasons. The most commonly reported one was “severe lesions” for cattle, “abscesses” for pigs and “pronounced weight loss” for small ruminants. These reasons could constitute valuable syndromic indicators as they are unspecific clinical manifestations of a large range of animal diseases (as well as potential indicators of animal welfare). Differences were detected in the rate of carcass condemnation between cantons and between large and small slaughterhouses. A large percentage (>60% for all three animal categories) of slaughterhouses operating never reported a condemnation between 2007 and 2012, a potential indicator of widespread non-reporting bias in our database.

Conclusions

The current system offers simultaneous coverage of cattle, pigs and small ruminants for the whole of Switzerland; and traceability of each condemnation to its farm of origin. The number of condemnations was significantly linked to the number of slaughters, meaning that the former should be always be offset by the later in analyses. Because this denominator is only communicated at the end of the month, condemnations may currently only be monitored on a monthly basis. Coupled with the lack of timeliness (30–60 days delay between condemnation and notification), this limits the use of the data for early-detection.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Vial and Reist; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Frankena K, White P, O’Keeffe J, Costello E, Martin S, van Grevenhof I, More S: Quantification of the relative efficiency of factory surveillance in the disclosure of tuberculosis lesions in attested Irish cattle. Vet Rec 2007, 161:679-684.
• [2]Harley S, More SJ, O’Connell NE, Hanlon A, Teixeira D, Boyle L: Evaluating the prevalence of tail biting and carcase condemnations in slaughter pigs in the Republic and Northern Ireland, and the potential of abattoir meat inspection as a welfare surveillance tool. Vet Rec 2012, 1-8. Epub 2012 Nov 5
• [3]Dupuy C, Morignat E, Maugey X, Vinard J-L, Hendrikx P, Ducrot C, Calavas D, Gay E: Defining syndromes using cattle meat inspection data for syndromic surveillance purposes: a statistical approach with the 2005–2010 data from ten French slaughterhouses. BMC Vet Res 2013, 9:88. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]Ellerbroek L, Mateus A, Stärk K, Alonso S, Lindberg A: Contribution of meat inspection to animal health surveillance in swine. Support Public 2012, 1-80. Available online, http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/doc/191e.pdf webcite
• [5]Hardstaff J, Nigsch A, Dadios N, Stärk K, Alonso S, Lindberg A: Contribution of meat inspection to animal health surveillance in sheep and goats. Support Public 2012. EN-320. [43 pp.]. Available online: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/search/doc/320e.pdf webcite
• [6]Harley S, More S, Boyle L, O’ Connell N, Hanlon A: Good animal welfare makes economic sense: potential of pig abattoir meat inspection as a welfare surveillance tool. Ir Vet J 2012, 65:11. BioMed Central Full Text
• [7]EFSA: EFSA: Scientific Opinion on the Public Health Hazards to be Covered by Inspection of Meat (Swine). EFSA J 2011, 9:23-24.
• [8]Dupuy C, Bronner A, Watson E, Wuyckhuise-Sjouke L, Reist M, Fouillet A, Calavas D, Hendrikx P, Perrin J-B: Inventory of veterinary syndromic surveillance initiatives in Europe (Triple-S project): Current situation and perspectives. Prev Vet Med 2013, 111:220-229.
• [9]Fricker RD, Chang JT: A Spatio-Temporal Methodology for Real-Time Biosurveillance. Qual Eng 2008, 20:465-477.
• [10]Alton GD, Pearl DL, Bateman KG, McNab WB, Berke O: Factors associated with whole carcass condemnation rates in provincially-inspected abattoirs in Ontario 2001–2007: implications for food animal syndromic surveillance. BMC Vet Res 2010, 6:42. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Bivand RS, Pebesma EJ, Gomez-Rubio V: Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R. New York: Springer; 2008.
• [12]Wood S: Generalized Additive Models: an introduction with R. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2006.
• [13]Amezcua R, Pearl DL, Martinez A, Friendship RM: Patterns of condemnation rates in swine from a federally inspected abattoir in relation to disease outbreak information in Ontario (2005–2007). Can Vet J 2011, 52:35-42.
• [14]Pig Health - Whole Carcass Condemnation [http://www.nadis.org.uk/bulletins/whole-carcass-condemnation.aspx webcite]