期刊论文详细信息
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
A comparison of patient characteristics, prognosis, treatment modalities, and survival according to age group in gastric cancer patients
Evin Büyükünal1  Süheyla Serdengeçti1  Fatih Selçukbiricik1  Deniz Tural1 
[1] Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul University, Istanbul, 34098, Turkey
关键词: Outcome;    Treatment;    Prognosis;    Population;    Characteristics;    Gastric cancer;    Elderly;   
Others  :  826983
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7819-10-234
 received in 2012-06-27, accepted in 2012-10-18,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate age-specific incidence rates and to compare disease stage, treatment, and survival according to age group in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Gastric cancer patients treated at our hospital between 1999 and 2010 were retrospectively evaluated. We divided the cases into two subgroups: group 1 consisted of patients older than 70 years at the time of treatment, and group 2 included patients aged 70 years or younger. In all, 151 patients over 70 years of age and 715 patients age 70 years or younger were analyzed. Categorical and continuous variables were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using statistical software. Overall survival rates were estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range: 22 to 90 years). Between 1999 and 2002 the annual median age for patients aged older than70 years was 9.8%, which increased to 20% between 2007 and 2010. The one-year survival rate for patients with metastatic disease (stage IV) was 10.9% (95% CI: 8.9% to 12.9%) and 27.8% (95% CI: 17.3% to 38.2%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.015). The five-year survival rate for patients with non-metastatic disease (in whom curative surgery was performed) was 15.5% (95% CI = 12% to 19%) and 26.9% (95% CI = 25.9% to 27.9%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in gender, tumor localization in the stomach, tumor histology, perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), tumor stage, or type of surgery between the two groups. However, fewer of the patients in group 1 underwent adjuvant treatment (P = 0.02) and palliative chemotherapy (P = 0.007) than group 2 patients that were non-metastatic and metastatic at presentation, respectively.

Conclusions

Groups 1 and 2 were similar in terms of histopathological features and surgical modality; however, the survival rate was lower in group 1 than in group 2. The incidence of gastric cancer was higher in the patients older than 70 years of age. Additional randomized studies are needed to further assess the safety and clinical benefit of chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients older than70 years of age.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Tural; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140713105422237.pdf 470KB PDF download
Figure 5. 26KB Image download
Figure 4. 24KB Image download
Figure 3. 29KB Image download
Figure 2. 45KB Image download
Figure 1. 67KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 2011, 61:212-236.
  • [2]Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, Ward EM: Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010, 19:1893-1907.
  • [3]Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010, 60:277-300.
  • [4]Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J: Estimates of the worldwide incidence of eighteen major cancers in 1985. Int J Cancer 1993, 54:594-606.
  • [5]Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS: Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. Eur J Cancer 2001, 37:4-66.
  • [6]Parkin DM: International variation. Oncogene 2004, 23:6329-6340.
  • [7]Hayat MJ, Howlader N, Reichman ME, Edwards BK: Cancer statistics, trends, and multiple primary cancer analyses from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Oncologist 2007, 12:20-37.
  • [8]Kitamura K, Yamaguchi T, Taniguchi H, Hagiwara A, Yamane T, Sawai K, Takahashi T: Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer in the elderly. Br J Cancer 1996, 73:798-802.
  • [9]Arai T, Takubo K, Esaki Y: Carcinogenesis and aging. Turk. J. Cancer 1997, 27:131-138.
  • [10]A Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin LDM, Parkin DM, Whelan S, et al.: International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. 3rd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
  • [11]Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr: Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer 1998, 83:2049-2053.
  • [12]Laurén P: The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1965, 64:31-49.
  • [13]Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010, 127:2893-2917.
  • [14]Bertuccio P, Chatenoud L, Levi F, Praud D, Ferlay J, Negri E, Malvezzi M, La Vecchia C: Recent patterns in gastric cancer: a global overview. Int J Cancer 2009, 125:666-673.
  • [15]Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009, 59:225-249.
  • [16]Saito H, Osaki T, Murakami D, Sakamoto T, Kanaji S, Tatebe S, Tsujitani S, Ikeguchi M: Effect of age on prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. ANZ J Surg 2006, 76:458-461.
  • [17]Arai T, Esaki Y, Inoshita N, Sawabe M, Kasahara I: Pathologic characteristics of gastric cancer in the elderly: a retrospective study of 994 surgical patients. Gastric Cancer 2004, 7:154-159.
  • [18]Inoshita N, Yanagisawa A, Arai T, Kitagawa T, Hirokawa K, Kato Y: Pathological characteristics of gastric carcinomas in the very old. Jpn J Cancer Res 1998, 89:1087-1092.
  • [19]Eguchi T, Fujii M, Takayama T: Mortality for gastric cancer in elderly patients. J Surg Oncol 2003, 84:132-136.
  • [20]Wu CW, Lo SS, Shen KH, Hsieh MC, Lui WY, P'eng FK: Surgical mortality, survival, and quality of life after resection for gastric cancer in the elderly. World J Surg 2000, 24:465-472.
  • [21]Kim DY, Joo JK, Ryu SY, Park YK, Kim YJ, Kim SK: Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric carcinoma in elderly patients: a comparison with young patients. World J Gastroenterol 2005, 11:22-26.
  • [22]Medina-Franco H, Heslin MJ, Cortes-Gonzalez R: Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric carcinoma in young and elderly patients: a comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 2000, 7:515-519.
  • [23]Bilici A, Seker M, Ustaalioglu BB, Kefeli U, Yildirim E, Yavuzer D, Aydin FM, Salepci T, Oncel M, Gumus M: Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol 2010, 17:2037-2044.
  • [24]Dicken BJ, Graham K, Hamilton SM, Andrews S, Lai R, Listgarten J, Jhangri GS, Saunders LD, Damaraju S, Cass C: Lymphovascular invasion is associated with poor survival in gastric cancer: an application of gene-expression and tissue array techniques. Ann Surg 2006, 243:64-73.
  • [25]Warneke VS, Behrens HM, Hartmann JT, Held H, Becker T, Schwarz NT: Cohort study based on the seventh edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: proposal of a new staging system. J Clin Oncol 2011, 29:2364-2371.
  • [26]Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, Hundahl SA, Estes NC, Stemmermann GN: Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:725-730.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:43次 浏览次数:41次