Predictors and moderators of outcomes of HIV/STD sex risk reduction interventions in substance abuse treatment programs: a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials

Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

George Woody²  Xin Tu³  Hua He³  Wan Tang³  Donald A Calsyn⁴  Hannah M Markell²  Jaclyn S Sadicario²  Robert Gallop¹  Paul Crits-Christoph² 

[1] Department of Mathematics, West Chester University, West Chester, PA, USA;Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA;Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA;The Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA

关键词: Moderators;    Predictors;    Randomized controlled trial;    Skills building;    HIV prevention intervention;   

Others  :  833892
DOI  :  10.1186/1747-597X-9-3

 received in 2013-10-29, accepted in 2014-01-08,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The objective of the current study was to examine predictors and moderators of response to two HIV sexual risk interventions of different content and duration for individuals in substance abuse treatment programs.

Methods

Participants were recruited from community drug treatment programs participating in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network (CTN). Data were pooled from two parallel randomized controlled CTN studies (one with men and one with women) each examining the impact of a multi-session motivational and skills training program, in comparison to a single-session HIV education intervention, on the degree of reduction in unprotected sex from baseline to 3- and 6- month follow-ups. The findings were analyzed using a zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) model.

Results

Severity of drug use (p < .01), gender (p < .001), and age (p < .001) were significant main effect predictors of number of unprotected sexual occasions (USOs) at follow-up in the non-zero portion of the ZINB model (men, younger participants, and those with greater severity of drug/alcohol abuse have more USOs). Monogamous relationship status (p < .001) and race/ethnicity (p < .001) were significant predictors of having at least one USO vs. none (monogamous individuals and African Americans were more likely to have at least one USO). Significant moderators of intervention effectiveness included recent sex under the influence of drugs/alcohol (p < .01 in non-zero portion of model), duration of abuse of primary drug (p < .05 in non-zero portion of model), and Hispanic ethnicity (p < .01 in the zero portion, p < .05 in the non-zero portion of model).

Conclusion

These predictor and moderator findings point to ways in which patients may be selected for the different HIV sexual risk reduction interventions and suggest potential avenues for further development of the interventions for increasing their effectiveness within certain subgroups.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Crits-Christoph et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Booth RE, Kwiatkowski CF, Chitwood DD: Sex related HIV risk behaviors: differential risks among injection drug users, crack smokers, and injection drug users who smoke crack. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000, 58:219-226.
• [2]Cooper ML: Does drinking promote risky sexual behavior? A complex answer to a simple question. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2006, 15:19-23.
• [3]Raj A, Saitz R, Cheng DM, Winter M, Samet JH: Associations between alcohol, heroin, and cocaine use and high risk sexual behaviors among detoxification patients. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2007, 33:169-178.
• [4]DeHovitz JA, Kelly P, Feldman J, Sierra MF, Clarke L, Bromberg J, Wan JY, Vermund SH, Landesman S: Sexually transmitted diseases, sexual behavior, and cocaine use in inner-city women. Am J Epidemiol 1994, 140:1125-1134.
• [5]Edlin BR, Irwin KL, Faruque S, McCoy CB, Word C, Serrano Y, Inciardi JA, Bowser BP, Schilling RF, Holmberg SD: Intersecting epidemics–crack cocaine use and HIV infection among inner-city young adults. New Engl J Med 1994, 331:1422-1427.
• [6]Brown LS, Kritz SA, Goldsmith RJ, Bini EJ, Rotrosen J, Baker S, Robinson J, McAuliffe P: Characteristics of substance abuse treatment programs providing services for HIV/AIDS, hepatitis C virus infection, and sexually transmitted infections: the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. J Subst Abuse Treat 2006, 30:315-321.
• [7]Shoptaw S, Tross S, Stephens M, Tai B: The NIDA CTN HIV/AIDS Workgroup. A snapshot of HIV/AIDS-related services in the clinical treatment providers for NIDA’s Clinical Trials Network. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002, 66:S163.
• [8]Meader N, Li R, Des Jarlais DC, Pilling S: Psychosocial interventions for reducing injection and sexual risk behavior for preventing HIV in drug users. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010, 20(1):CD007192.
• [9]Calsyn DA, Hatch-Maillette M, Tross S, Doyle SR, Crits-Christoph P, Song YS, Harrer JM, Lalos G, Berns SB: Motivational and skills training HIV/STI sexual risk reduction groups for men. J Subst Abuse Treat 2009, 37:138-150.
• [10]Tross S, Campbell AN, Cohen LR, Calsyn D, Pavlicova M, Miele G, Hu MC, Haynes L, Nugent N, Gan W, Hatch-Maillette M, Mandler R, McLaughlin P, El-Bassel N, Crits-Christoph P, Nunes EV: Effectiveness of HIV/STD sexual risk reduction groups for women in substance abuse treatment programs: results of a NIDA clinical trials network trial. JAIDS 2008, 48:581-589.
• [11]Calsyn DA, Campbell AN, Crits-Christoph P, Doyle SR, Tross S, Hatch-Maillette MA, Mandler R: Men in methadone maintenance versus psychosocial outpatient treatment: differences in sexual risk behaviors and intervention effectiveness from a multisite HIV prevention intervention trial. J Addict Dis 2010, 29:370-382.
• [12]Calsyn DA, Burlew AK, Hatch-Maillette MA, Wilson J, Beadnell B, Wright L: Real men are safe-culturally adapted: utilizing the Delphi process to revise real men are safe for an ethnically diverse group of men in substance abuse treatment. AIDS Educ Prev 2012, 24:117-131.
• [13]Avins AL, Woods WJ, Lindan CP, Hudes ES, Clark W, Hulley SB: HIV infection and risk behaviors among heterosexuals in alcohol treatment programs. JAMA 1994, 271:515-518.
• [14]Chitwood DD, Comerford M, Sanchez J: Prevalence and risk factors for HIV among sniffers, short-term injectors, and long-term injectors of heroin. J Psychoactive Drugs 2003, 35:445-453.
• [15]Halkitis PN, Shrem MT, Martin FW: Sexual behavior patterns of methamphetamine-using gay and bisexual men. Subst Use Misuse 2005, 40:703-719.
• [16]McElrath K: MDMA and sexual behavior: ecstasy users’ perceptions about sexuality and sexual risk. Subst Use Misuse 2005, 40:1461-1477.
• [17]Shillington AM, Cottler LB, Compton WM, Spitznagel EL: Is there a relationship between “heavy drinking” and HIV high risk sexual behaviors among general population subjects? Subst Use Misuse 1995, 30:1453-1478.
• [18]Calsyn DA, Wells EA, Saxon AJ, Jackson R: Defining the relationship between sex and drugs. In Problems of Drug Dependence 1998. Edited by Harris LS. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1999:268.
• [19]Calsyn DA, Wells EA, Saxon AJ, Jackson TR: Methadone clients combining drugs and sex use more drugs. In Problems of Drug Dependence 1996. Edited by Harris LS. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1997:122.
• [20]Calsyn DA, Wells EA, Saxon AJ, Jackson R, Heiman JR: Sexual activity under the influence of drugs is common among methadone clients. In Problems of Drug Dependence 1999. Edited by Harris LS. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 2000:315.
• [21]Rawson RA, Washton A, Domier CP, Reiber C: Drugs and sexual effects: role of drug type and gender. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002, 22:103-108.
• [22]Exner TM, Seal DW, Ehrhardt AA: A review of HIV interventions for at-risk women. AIDS Behav 1997, 1:93-124.
• [23]Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ: HIV sexual risk reduction interventions for women: a review. Am J Prev Med 1996, 12:209-217.
• [24]Mize SJ, Robinson BE, Bockting WO, Scheltema KE: Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of HIV prevention interventions for women. AIDS Care 2002, 14:163-180.
• [25]Meyer-Bahlburg H, Ehrhardt A, Exner TM, Gruen RS: Sexual risk behavior assessment schedule—Adult—Armory interview. New York, NY: New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University; 1991.
• [26]Sohler N, Colson PW, Meyer-Bahlburg HF, Susser E: Reliability of self-reports about sexual risk behavior for HIV among homeless men with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2000, 51:814-816.
• [27]McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, Peters R, Smith I, Grissom G, Pettinati H, Argeriou M: The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J Subst Ab Treat 1992, 9:99-213.
• [28]Ajzen I, Madden TJ: Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J Exp Soc Psychol 1986, 22:453-474.
• [29]Fishbein M, Ajzen I: Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley; 1975.
• [30]Bandura A: Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of control over AIDS infection. Eval Program Plann 1990, 13:9-17.
• [31]Hu MC, Pavlicova M, Nunes EV: Zero-inflated and hurdle models of count data with extra zeros: examples from an HIV-risk reduction intervention trial. Am J Drug Alcohol Ab 2011, 37:367-375.
• [32]Cameron AC, Trivedi PK: Regression analysis of count data. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
• [33]Vuong QH: Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 1989, 57:307-333.
• [34]Khoshgoftaar TM, Gao K, Szabo RM: An application of zero-inflated poisson regression for software fault prediction. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering: 27–30 Nov 2001. Hong Kong; 2001:66-73.
• [35]Exner TM, Dworkin SL, Hoffman S, Ehrhardt AA: Beyond the male condom: the evolution of gender-specific HIV interventions for women. Annu Rev Sex Res 2003, 14:114-136.
• [36]Misovich S, Fisher J, Fisher W: Close relationships and elevated HIV risk behavior: evidence and possible underlying psychological processes. Rev Gen Psychol 1997, 1:72-107.
• [37]Simoni J, Walters K, Nero D: Safer sex among HIV + women: the role of relationships. Sex Roles 2000, 42:691-708.
• [38]Rosenthal JA: Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. J Soc Serv Res 1996, 21:37-59.
• [39]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Diagnoses of HIV infection and AIDS in the United States and Dependent Areas, 2009. HIV Surveillance Report 2011., 21Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/surveillance/resources/reports/2009report/ webcite
• [40]Calsyn DA, Burlew AK, Hatch-Maillette MA, Beadnell B, Wright L, Wilson J: An HIV prevention intervention for ethnically diverse men in substance abuse treatment: pilot study findings. Am J Public Health 2013, 103:896-902.
• [41]Calsyn DA, Baldwin H, Niu X, Crits-Christoph P, Hatch-Maillette MA: Sexual risk behavior and sex under the influence: an event analysis of men in substance abuse treatment who have sex with women. Am J Addict 2011, 20:250-256.
• [42]Agosti V, Nunes E, Ocepeck-Welikson K: Patient factors related to early attrition from an outpatient cocaine research clinic. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1996, 22:29-39.
• [43]Hubbard RL, Marsden ME, Rachal JV, Harwood HJ, Cavanaugh ER, Ginzburg HM: Drug abuse treatment: a national study of effectiveness. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 1989.
• [44]Joe GW, Simpson DD, Broome KM: Effects of readiness for drug abuse treatment on client retention and assessment of process. Addiction 1998, 93:1177-1190.
• [45]Levinson T, McLachlan J: Factors relating to outcome in the treatment of alcohol addiction at the Donwood Institute. Toxicomanies 1973, 6:203-221.
• [46]McCaul ME, Svikis DS, Moore RD: Predictors of outpatient treatment retention: patient versus substance use characteristics. Drug Alcohol Depend 2001, 62:9-17.
• [47]Query JN: Comparative admission and follow up-study of American Indians and Whites in a youth chemical dependency unit on the North Central Plains. Int J Addict 1985, 20:489-502.
• [48]Westhuis DJ, Gwaltney L, Hayashi R: Outpatient cocaine abuse treatment: predictors of success. J Drug Educ 2001, 31:171-183.
• [49]McLellan AT, Luborsky L, O’Brien C: Alcohol and drug abuse treatment in three different populations: is there improvement and is it predictable? Am J Drug Alcohol Ab 1986, 12:101-120.
• [50]McLellan AT, Alterman AI, Metzger DS, Grissom GR, Woody GE, Luborsky L, O’Brien CP: Similarity of outcome predictors across opiate, cocaine, and alcohol treatments: role of treatment services. J Consult Clin Psych 1994, 62:1141-1158.
• [51]Greenfield SF, Brooks AJ, Gordon SM, Green CA, Kropp F, McHugh RK, Lincoln M, Hien D, Miele GM: Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: a review of the literature. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007, 86:1-21.
• [52]Yeom HS: Gender differences in treatment outcomes among participants in a mixed-gender substance abuse aftercare program. Soc Work Public Health 2011, 26:557-576.
• [53]Adamson SJ, Sellman JD, Frampton C: Patient predictors of alcohol treatment outcome: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat 2009, 36:75-86.