Protocol: a fast and simple in situ PCR method for localising gene expression in plant tissue

Plant Methods

Matthew Gilliham¹  Simon J Conn²  Rachel A Burton⁵  Weng W Ng¹  Gwenda M Mayo³  Charlotte Jordans¹  Vanessa M Conn¹  Sandra K Tanz⁴  Asmini Athman¹ 

[1] Waite Research Institute & School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, PMB1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia;Centre for Cancer Biology, Division Immunology, Level 3, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA, Australia;Adelaide Microscopy Waite Facility, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia;ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia;ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia

关键词: Immunohistochemistry;    Plant tissue;    Cell-specific localisation;    RT-PCR;    In situ PCR;   

Others  :  1151524
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-4811-10-29

 received in 2014-05-23, accepted in 2014-09-10,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

An important step in characterising the function of a gene is identifying the cells in which it is expressed. Traditional methods to determine this include in situ hybridisation, gene promoter-reporter fusions or cell isolation/purification techniques followed by quantitative PCR. These methods, although frequently used, can have limitations including their time-consuming nature, limited specificity, reliance upon well-annotated promoters, high cost, and the need for specialized equipment. In situ PCR is a relatively simple and rapid method that involves the amplification of specific mRNA directly within plant tissue whilst incorporating labelled nucleotides that are subsequently detected by immunohistochemistry. Another notable advantage of this technique is that it can be used on plants that are not easily genetically transformed.

Results

An optimised workflow for in-tube and on-slide in situ PCR is presented that has been evaluated using multiple plant species and tissue types. The protocol includes optimised methods for: (i) fixing, embedding, and sectioning of plant tissue; (ii) DNase treatment; (iii) in situ RT-PCR with the incorporation of DIG-labelled nucleotides; (iv) signal detection using colourimetric alkaline phosphatase substrates; and (v) mounting and microscopy. We also provide advice on troubleshooting and the limitations of using fluorescence as an alternative detection method. Using our protocol, reliable results can be obtained within two days from harvesting plant material. This method requires limited specialized equipment and can be adopted by any laboratory with a vibratome (vibrating blade microtome), a standard thermocycler, and a microscope. We show that the technique can be used to localise gene expression with cell-specific resolution.

Conclusions

The in situ PCR method presented here is highly sensitive and specific. It reliably identifies the cellular expression pattern of even highly homologous and low abundance transcripts within target tissues, and can be completed within two days of harvesting tissue. As such, it has considerable advantages over other methods, especially in terms of time and cost. We recommend its adoption as the standard laboratory technique of choice for demonstrating the cellular expression pattern of a gene of interest.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Athman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Rhee SY, Mutwil M: Towards revealing the functions of all genes in plants. Trends Plant Sci 2014, 19:212-221.
• [2]Li S, Pandey S, Gookin TE, Zhao Z, Wilson L, Assmann SM: Gene-sharing networks reveal organizing principles of transcriptomes in Arabidopsis and other multicellular organisms. Plant Cell 2012, 24:1362-1378.
• [3]Chaumont F, Tyerman SD: Aquaporins: highly regulated channels controlling plant water relations. Plant Physiol 2014, 164:1600-1618.
• [4]Henderson S, Gilliham M: The ‘gatekeeper’ concept: cell-type specific molecular mechanisms of plant adaptation to abiotic stress. In Mechanisms of Plant Adaptation. Edited by Laitinen R. New Jersey: Wiley; 2015. in press
• [5]Taylor CB: Promoter fusion analysis: an insufficient measure of gene expression. Plant Cell 1997, 9:273-275.
• [6]Conn SJ, Gilliham M, Athman A, Schreiber AW, Baumann U, Moller I, Cheng N-H, Stancombe MA, Hirschi KD, Webb AAR, Burton R, Kaiser BN, Tyerman SD, Leigh RA: Cell-specific vacuolar calcium storage mediated by CAX1 regulates apoplastic calcium concentration, gas exchange, and plant productivity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23:240-257.
• [7]Roy SJ, Conn SJ, Mayo GM, Athman A, Gilliham M: Transcriptomics on small samples. In Methods in Molecular Biology. Volume 913. Edited by Shabala S, Cuin TA. Humana Press: New Jersey; 2012:335-350.
• [8]Nuovo GJ: In situ localization of PCR-amplified DNA and cDNA. In Methods in Molecular Biology. Volume 123. Edited by Darby IA. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2000:217-238.
• [9]Birnbaum K, Jung JW, Wang JY, Lambert GM, Hirst JA, Galbraith DW, Benfey PN: Cell type-specific expression profiting in plants via cell sorting of protoplasts from fluorescent reporter lines. Nat Methods 2005, 2:615-619.
• [10]Brady SM, Orlando DA, Lee J-Y, Wang JY, Koch J, Dinneny JR, Mace D, Ohler U, Benfey PN: A high-resolution root spatiotemporal map reveals dominant expression patterns. Science 2007, 318:801-806.
• [11]Deal RB, Henikoff S: A simple method for gene expression and chromatin profiling of individual cell types within a tissue. Dev Cell 2010, 18:1030-1040.
• [12]Zhang C, Barthelson RA, Lambert GM, Galbraith DW: Global characterization of cell-specific gene expression through fluorescence-activated sorting of nuclei. Plant Physiol 2008, 147:30-40.
• [13]Grindberg RV, Yee-Greenbaum JL, McConnell MJ, Novotny M, O'Shaughnessy AL, Lambert GM, Arauzo-Bravo MJ, Lee J, Fishman M, Robbins GE, Lin X, Venepally P, Badger JH, Galbraith DW, Gage FH, Lasken RS: RNA-sequencing from single nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:19802-19807.
• [14]Ginart P, Raj A: RNA sequencing in situ. Nat Biotechnol 2014, 32:543-544.
• [15]Bagasra O: Protocols for the in situ PCR-amplification and detection of mRNA and DNA sequences. Nat Protoc 2007, 2:2782-2795.
• [16]Johansen B: In situ PCR on plant material with sub-cellular resolution. Ann Bot 1997, 80:697-700.
• [17]Koltai H, Bird DM: High throughput cellular localization of specific plant mRNAs by liquid-phase in situ reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of tissue sections. Plant Physiol 2000, 123:1203-1212.
• [18]Pesquet E, Barbier O, Ranocha P, Jauneau A, Goffner D: Multiple gene detection by in situ RT-PCR in isolated plant cells and tissues. Plant J 2004, 39:947-959.
• [19]Lee YH, Tegeder M: Selective expression of a novel high-affinity transport system for acidic and neutral amino acids in the tapetum cells of Arabidopsis flowers. Plant J 2004, 40:60-74.
• [20]Przybecki Z, Siedlecka E, Filipecki M, Urbanczyk-Wochniak E: In situ reverse transcription PCR on plant tissues. In Methods in Molecular Biology. Volume 334. Edited by Pellestor F. Humana Press: New Jersey; 2006:181-198.
• [21]Munns R, James RA, Xu B, Athman A, Conn SJ, Jordans C, Byrt CS, Hare RA, Tyerman SD, Tester M, Gilliham M: Wheat grain yield on saline soils is improved by an ancestral Na+ transporter gene. Nat Biotechnol 2012, 30:360-U173.
• [22]Vandeleur RK, Sullivan W, Athman A, Jordans C, Gilliham M, Kaiser BN, Tyerman SD: Rapid shoot-to-root signalling regulates root hydraulic conductance via aquaporins. Plant Cell Environ 2014, 37(2):520-538.
• [23]Tiong J, McDonald GK, Genc Y, Pedas P, Hayes JE, Toubia J, Langridge P, Huang CY: HvZIP7 mediates zinc accumulation in barley (Hordeum vulgare) at moderately high zinc supply. New Phytol 2014, 201:131-143.
• [24]Byrt C, Xu B, Krishnan M, Lightfoot D, Athman A, Jacobs A, Watson-Haigh N, Munns R, Tester M, Gilliham M: The Na+ transporter, TaHKT1;5-D, limits shoot Na+ accumulation in bread wheat. Plant J 2014. doi:10.1111/tpj.12651
• [25]Conn SJ, Hocking B, Dayod M, Xu B, Athman A, Henderson S, Aukett L, Conn V, Shearer MK, Fuentes S, Tyerman SD, Gilliham M: Protocol: optimising hydroponic growth systems for nutritional and physiological analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana and other plants. Plant Methods 2013, 9:4. BioMed Central Full Text
• [26]Fox CH, Johnson FB, Whiting J, Roller PP: Formaldehyde fixation. J Histochem Cytochem 1985, 33:845-853.
• [27]Thavarajah R, Mudimbaimannar VK, Elizabeth J, Rao UK, Ranganathan K: Chemical and physical basics of routine formaldehyde fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2012, 16:400-405.
• [28]Dapson RW: Macromolecular changes caused by formalin fixation and antigen retrieval. Biotech Histochem 2007, 82:133-140.
• [29]Puchtler H, Meloan SN: On the chemistry of formaldehyde fixation and its effects on immunohistochemical reactions. Histochemistry 1985, 82:201-204.
• [30]Gilliham M, Athman A, Tyerman SD, Conn SJ: Cell-specific compartmentation of mineral nutrients is an essential mechanism for optimal plant productivity - another role for TPC1? Plant Signal Behav 2011, 6:1656-1661.
• [31]Ren ZH, Gao JP, Li LG, Cai XL, Huang W, Chao DY, Zhu MZ, Wang ZY, Luan S, Lin HX: A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nat Genet 2005, 37:1141-1146.
• [32]Sunarpi Horie T, Motoda J, Kubo M, Yang H, Yoda K, Horie R, Chan WY, Leung HY, Hattori K, Konomi M, Osumi M, Yamagami M, Schroeder JI, Uozomi N: Enhanced salt tolerance mediated by AtHKT1 transporter-induced Na+ unloading from xylem vessels to xylem parenchyma cells. Plant J 2005, 44:928-938.
• [33]Waters S, Gilliham M, Hrmova M: Plant high-affinity potassium (HKT) transporters involved in salinity tolerance: structural insights to probe differences in ion selectivity. Int J Mol Sci 2013, 14:7660-7680.
• [34]Gruber BD, Ryan PR, Richardson AE, Tyerman SD, Ramesh S, Hebb DM, Howitt SM, Delhaize E: HvALMT1 from barley is involved in the transport of organic anions. J Exp Bot 2010, 61:1455-1467.
• [35]Meyer S, Mumm P, Imes D, Endler A, Weder B, Al-Rasheid KAS, Geiger D, Marten I, Martinoia E, Hedrich R: AtALMT12 represents an R-type anion channel required for stomatal movement in Arabidopsis guard cells. Plant J 2010, 63:1054-1062.
• [36]De Angeli A, Zhang J, Meyer S, Martinoia E: AtALMT9 is a malate-activated vacuolar chloride channel required for stomatal opening in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun 2013, 4:1084.
• [37]Boubourakas IN, Voloudakis AE, Fasseas K, Resnick N, Koltai H, Kyriakopoulou PE: Cellular localization of peach latent mosaic viroid in peach sections by liquid phase in situ RT-PCR. Plant Pathol 2011, 60:468-473.