Imputing forest carbon stock estimates from inventory plots to a nationally continuous coverage

Carbon Balance and Management

Douglas M Griffith¹  Christopher W Woodall¹  Barry Tyler Wilson¹ 

[1] USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Forest Inventory and Analysis, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA

关键词: Raster maps;    Forest inventory;    United States;    Imputation;    Carbon density;    Forest;   

Others  :  791068
DOI  :  10.1186/1750-0680-8-1

 received in 2012-08-14, accepted in 2013-01-09,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

The U.S. has been providing national-scale estimates of forest carbon (C) stocks and stock change to meet United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) reporting requirements for years. Although these currently are provided as national estimates by pool and year to meet greenhouse gas monitoring requirements, there is growing need to disaggregate these estimates to finer scales to enable strategic forest management and monitoring activities focused on various ecosystem services such as C storage enhancement. Through application of a nearest-neighbor imputation approach, spatially extant estimates of forest C density were developed for the conterminous U.S. using the U.S.’s annual forest inventory. Results suggest that an existing forest inventory plot imputation approach can be readily modified to provide raster maps of C density across a range of pools (e.g., live tree to soil organic carbon) and spatial scales (e.g., sub-county to biome). Comparisons among imputed maps indicate strong regional differences across C pools. The C density of pools closely related to detrital input (e.g., dead wood) is often highest in forests suffering from recent mortality events such as those in the northern Rocky Mountains (e.g., beetle infestations). In contrast, live tree carbon density is often highest on the highest quality forest sites such as those found in the Pacific Northwest. Validation results suggest strong agreement between the estimates produced from the forest inventory plots and those from the imputed maps, particularly when the C pool is closely associated with the imputation model (e.g., aboveground live biomass and live tree basal area), with weaker agreement for detrital pools (e.g., standing dead trees). Forest inventory imputed plot maps provide an efficient and flexible approach to monitoring diverse C pools at national (e.g., UNFCCC) and regional scales (e.g., Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation projects) while allowing timely incorporation of empirical data (e.g., annual forest inventory).

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Wilson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Figure 13.

Figure 14.

Figure 15.

Figure 16.

Figure 17.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Pacala SW, Hurtt GC, Baker D, Peylin P, Houghton RA, Birdsey RA, Heath L, Sundquist ET, Stallard RF, Ciais P, Moorcroft P, Caspersen JP, Shevliakova E, Moore B, Kohlmaier G, Holland E, Gloor M, Harmon ME, Fan S-M, Sarmiento JL, Goodale CL, Schimel D, Field CB: Consistent land- and atmosphere-based U.S. carbon sink estimates. Science 2001, 292:2316-2320.
• [2]Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA, Phillips OL, Shvidenko A, Lewis SL, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Jackson RB, Pacala S, McGuire AD, Piao S, Rautiainen A, Sitch S, Hayes D: A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 2011, 333:988-993.
• [3]UNFCCC (United Nations framework convention on climate change) http://unfccc.int webcite
• [4]Malmsheimer RW, Heffernan P, Brink S, Crandall D, Deneke F, Galik C, Gee E, Helms JA, McClure N, Mortimer M, Ruddell S, Smith M, Stewart J: Forest management solutions for mitigating climate change in the United States. J Forestry 2008, 106:115-171.
• [5]Ryan MG, Harmon ME, Birdsey RA, Giardina CP, Heath LS, Houghton RA, Jackson RB, McKinley DC, Morrison JF, Murray BC, Pataki DE, Skog KE: A synthesis of the science on forests and carbon for US forests. Issues Ecol 2010, 13:1-16.
• [6]U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2009. Chapter 7. Land use, land-use change, and forestry. Annex 3.12. Methodology for estimating net carbon stock changes in forest land remaining forest lands. 430-R-11-005. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2011.
• [7]Heath LS, Smith J, Skog K, Nowak D, Woodall CW: Managed forest carbon stock and stock-change estimates for the U.S. greenhouse gas inventory, 1990–2008. J Forestry 2011, 109:167-173.
• [8]Woudenberg SW, Conkling BL, O’Connell BM, LaPoint EB, Turner JA, Waddell KL: The forest inventory and analysis database: database description and user’s manual version 4.0 For phase 2. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR- 245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; 2010.
• [9]Woodall CW, Heath LS, Domke GM, Nichols M, Oswalt C: Methods and equations for estimating aboveground volume, biomass, and carbon for forest trees in the U.S. forest inventory, 2010. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-88. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station; 2011.
• [10]Malmsheimer RW, Bowyer JL, Fried JS, Gee E, Izlar R, Reid RA, Munn IA, Oneil E, Stewart WC: Managing forests because carbon matters: integrating energy, products, and land management policy. J Forestry 2011, 109:S7-S50.
• [11]Zhu Z (Ed): A method for assessing carbon stocks, carbon sequestration, and greenhouse gas fluxes in ecosystems of the United States under present conditions and future scenarios. Scientific investigations report 2010-5233. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey; 2010.
• [12]Woodall CW, Domke GM, MacFarlane DW, Oswalt CM: Comparing field- and model-based standing dead tree carbon stock estimates across forests of the United States. Forestry 2012, 85:125-133.
• [13]Wilson BT, Lister AJ, Riemann RI: A nearest-neighbor imputation approach to mapping tree species over large areas using forest inventory plots and moderate resolution raster data. Forest Ecol Manage 2012, 271:182-198.
• [14]Ohmann JL, Gregory MJ: Predictive mapping of forest composition and structure with direct gradient analysis and nearest-neighbor imputation in coastal Oregon, U.S.A. Can J Forest Res 2002, 32:725-741.
• [15]Brown S: Measuring, monitoring, and verification of carbon benefits for forest-based projects. Philos Trans R Soc 2002, 360:1669-1683.
• [16]Harmon ME: Carbon sequestration in forests: addressing the scale question. J Forestry 2001, 99:24-29.
• [17]Running SW: Ecosystem disturbance, carbon, and climate. Science 2008, 321:652-653.
• [18]Kurz WA, Dymond CC, Stenson G, Rampley GJ, Carroll AL, Ebata T, Safranyik L: Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 2008, 452:987-990.
• [19]Hicke JA, Allen CD, Desai AR, Dietze MC, Hall RJ, Hogg EH, Kashian DM, Moore D, Raffa KF, Sturrock RN, Vogelmann J: Effects of biotic disturbances on forest carbon cycling in the United States and Canada. Global Change Biol 2012, 18:7-34.
• [20]Westfall JA, Woodall CW, Hatfield MA: A statistical power analysis of woody carbon flux from forest inventory data. Climatic ChangeIn Press
• [21]Woodall CW, Perry CH, Westfall JA: An empirical assessment of forest floor carbon stock components across the United States. Forest Ecol Manage 2012, 269:1-9.
• [22]Smith WB, Miles PD, Perry CH, Pugh SA: Forest resources of the United States, 2007. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-78. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office; 2009.
• [23]Bechtold WA, Patterson PL (Eds): The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program - national sampling design and estimation procedures. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-80. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station; 2005.
• [24]U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Forest Inventory and Analysis national core field guide, Volume I: Field data collection procedures for phase 2 plots, version 5.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; 2011. http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library webcite
• [25]U.S. Department of agriculture, forest service, forest inventory and analysis DataMart, FIADB version 5.1 http://apps.fs.fed.us/fiadb-downloads/datamart.html webcite
• [26]Thornton PE, Running SW, White MA: Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain. J Hydrology 1997, 190:214-251.
• [27]Omernik JM: Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Map (scale 1:7500,000). Annals Assoc Am Geographers 1987, 77:118-125.
• [28]Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA: National scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. Forest Sci 2003, 49:12-35.
• [29]Domke GM, Woodall CW, Smith JE: Accounting for density reduction and structural loss in standing dead trees: Implications for forest biomass and carbon stock estimates in the United States. Carbon Bal Manage 2011, 6:14. BioMed Central Full Text
• [30]Riemann R, Wilson BT, Lister A, Parks S: An effective assessment protocol for continuous geospatial datasets of forest characteristics using USFS Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data. Remote Sensing Environ 2010, 114:2337-2352.
• [31]Ji L, Gallo K: An agreement coefficient for image comparison. Photogrammetric Eng Remote Sensing 2006, 72:823-833.