Construct validity and impact of mode of administration of the PedsQL™ among a pediatric injury population

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Mariana Brussoni²  Amy Schneeberg³  Sami Kruse¹ 

[1] Child & Family Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada;British Columbia Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada;School of Population & Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

关键词: Measurement;    Instrument;    Health related quality of life;    Injury;    Child;   

Others  :  1144233
DOI  :  10.1186/s12955-014-0168-2

 received in 2014-05-29, accepted in 2014-11-07,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine the construct validity of the PedsQL™ health related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument for use among injured children and to examine the impact of using different modes of administration, including paper and pencil, online and telephone.

Methods

Two hundred thirty-three participants (aged 0 – 16) were recruited from hospital wards and the emergency department of a pediatric hospital in a large urban center in British Columbia, Canada. Data used to evaluate the construct validity of the PedsQL™ were collected from participants at the time of seeking injury treatment (baseline) to capture a retrospective measure of pre injury health, and one month post injury. Data used to compare different modes of administration (n = 44) were collected at baseline. To assess construct validity repeated measures analysis of variance (rANOVA) was used to determine whether the PedsQL™ tool was able to discriminate between patients pre and post injury while investigating possible interaction by category of length of stay in hospital. The impact of different modalities of administering the PedsQL™ on item responses was investigated using Bland-Altman plots.

Results

rANOVA showed significant differences in PedsQL™ total score between baseline and one month post injury (p < .001), and differences in mean total score at one month post injury by category of injury severity (p < .001). There was also significant interaction by category of injury severity for the change in PedsQL™ total score from baseline to one month (p < .001). Pearson’s correlations were highly significant across three modalities of survey administration: paper and pencil, computer and telephone administration (range: .92 to .97, p < .001). Bland-Altman plots showed strong consistency.

Conclusion

The PedsQL™ instrument is able to discriminate between pre and post injury HRQoL, as well as HRQoL post injury for injuries of varying severity. These findings are an indication that this instrument has good construct validity for the purpose of evaluating HRQoL of injured children. Data collected via paper-pencil, online and telephone administration were highly consistent. This is important as depending on the setting, clinical or research, different modalities of completing this instrument may be more appropriate.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Kruse et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Holder Y, Peden M, Krug E, Lund J, Gururaj G, Kobusingye O: Injury Surveillance Guidelines. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2004.
• [2]Leading Causes of Death in Canada, 2009 Data Tables. Statistics Canada, Ottawa; 2009.
• [3]Table 2: Leading Causes of Hospitalizations, Canada, 2004, Males and Females Combined: Counts (crude Rate per 100,000). 2008.
• [4]Van Beeck Larson CF, Lyons RA, Meerding W, Mulder S, Essink-Bot MEF: Guidelines for the conduction of follow up studies measuring injury-related disability. J Trauma 2007, 62:534-550.
• [5]Polinder S, Meerding WJ, Toet H, Mulker S, Essink-Bot M, Beeck van EF: Prevalence and prognostic factors of disabiltiy after childhood injury. Pediatrics 2005, 116:e810-e817.
• [6]Varni J, Burwinkle T, Lane M: Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: an appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005, 3:34-43. BioMed Central Full Text
• [7]Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL: Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993, 118:622-629.
• [8]Last J: A Dictionary of Epidemiology. 4th edition. Oxford University Press, New York; 2001.
• [9]Watson WL, Ozanne-Smith J, Richardson J: Retrospective baseline measurement of self-reported health status and health-related quality of life versus population norms in the evaluation of post-injury losses. Inj Prev 2007, 13:45-50.
• [10]Wilson R, Derrett S, Hansen P, Langley J: Retrospective evaluation versus population norms for the measurement of baseline health status. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012, 10:68. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Connolly MA, Johnson JA: Measuring quality of life in paediatric patients. Pharmacoeconomics 1999, 16:605-625.
• [12]Barnes PM, Jenney ME: Measuring quality of life. Curr Paediatr 2002, 12:476-480.
• [13]Murray CJL, Lopez AD, Black R, Mathers CD, Shibuya K, Ezzati M, Salomon JA, Michaud CM, Walker N, Vos T: Global burden of disease 2005: Call for collaborators. Lancet 2007, 370:109-110.
• [14]Polinder van Beeck EF, Essink-Bot ML, Toet H, Looman CWN, Mulder S, Meerding WJS: Functional outcome at 2.5, 5, 9 and 24 months after injury in the Netherlands. J Trauma 2007, 62:133-141.
• [15]Soberg HL, Bautz-Holter E, Roise O, Finset A: Long-term multidimensional functional consequences of severe multiple injuries two years after trauma: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. J Trauma 2007, 62:461-470.
• [16]Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS: PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care 2001, 39:800-812.
• [17]Varni J, Limbers C, Neighbors K, Schulz K, Lieu JC, Heffer R, Tuzinkiewicz K, Mangione-Smith R, Zimmerman J, Alonso E: The PedsQL Infant Scales: feasibility, internal consistency reliability, and validity in healthy and ill infants. Qual Life Res 2011, 20:45-55.
• [18]Willis CD, Gabbe BJ, Butt W, Cameron PA: Assessing outcomes in paediatric trauma populations. Inj Int J Care Inj 2006, 37:1185-1196.
• [19]Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM: Parent proxy-report of their children’s health-related quality of life: an analysis of 13,878 parents’ reliability and validity across age subgroups using the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007, 5:2-12. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM, Bryant WP, Wilson DP: The ePedsQL in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Internet administration. Diabetes Care 2008, 31:672-677.
• [21]Young N, Varni J, Snider L, McCormick A, Sawatzky B, Scott M, King G, Hetherington R, Sears E, Nicholas D: The internet is valid and reliable for child-report: An example using the Activities Scale for Kids (ASK) and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). J Clin Epidemiol 2009, 62:314-320.
• [22]Newgard CD, Fleischman R, Choo E, Ma OJ, Hedges JR, McConnell KJ: Validation of length of hospital stay as a surrogate measure for injury severity and resource use among injury survivors. Acad Emerg Med 2010, 17:142-150.
• [23]Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper Collins, Third, New York; 1996.
• [24]Varni JW, Burwinkle TM: The PedsQL as a patient-reported outcome in children and adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: a population-based study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006, 4:26-36. BioMed Central Full Text
• [25]Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 1:307-310.
• [26]Szklo M, Nieto J: Epidemiology: Beyond the Basics. 2nd edition. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA; 2007.
• [27]Beaton DE, Mustard C: Listening for Direction on Injury Prevention and Control Summary Brief: Post-Acute Care and Rehabilitation of Injury. SMARTRISK, Toronto; 2003.
• [28]Injury Surveillance in Canada: Current Realities and Challenges. Health Canada, Ottawa; 2003.
• [29]Janssens L, Gorter JW, Ketelaar M, Kramer WLM, Holtslag HR: Long-term health condition in major pediatric trauma: a pilot study. J Pediatr Surg 2009, 44:1591-1600.
• [30]Stevens MW, Hainsworth KR, Weisman SJ, Layde PM: Health-related quality of life in pediatric minor injury: reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory in the emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2012, 166:74-81.
• [31]Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA: The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care 1999, 37:126-139.
• [32]Holmes S: Methodological and ethical considerations in designing an Internet study of quality of life: a discussion paper. Int J Nurs Stud 2009, 46:394-405.
• [33]Bliven B, Kaufman S, Spertus J: Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: Validity, time benefits, and patient preference. Qual Life Res 2001, 10:15-21.
• [34]Canadian Internet Use Survey, 2012. Statistics Canada, Ottawa; 2012.