The Oxford Shoulder Instability Score; validation in Dutch and first-time assessment of its smallest detectable change

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

W. Jaap Willems⁴  Caroline B. Terwee¹  Derek F. P. van Deurzen³  Loes W. A. H. van Beers³  Derk A. van Kampen²  Just A. van der Linde³ 

[1] Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Waterland Ziekenhuis, Purmerend, The Netherlands;Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, 1090 HM, The Netherlands;Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, De Lairesse Kliniek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

关键词: Dutch;    Score;    Instability;    Shoulder;    Oxford;    Validation;   

Others  :  1227809
DOI  :  10.1186/s13018-015-0286-5

 received in 2015-07-06, accepted in 2015-09-02,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

The Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) is a short, self-reported outcome measurement for patients with shoulder instability.

In this study, the OSIS was validated in Dutch by testing the internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, validity and the floor and ceiling effects, and its smallest detectable change (SDC) was calculated.

Methods

A total of 138 patients were included. Internal consistency was calculated with Cronbach’s α. Reliability (test-retest) was calculated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The measurement error was calculated (SEM), and the SDC was estimated in a subgroup of 99 patients that completed the re-test after a mean of 13 days (5–30 days). Construct validity was evaluated by comparing the OSIS with the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index (WOSI), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand assessment (DASH), and the Short Form-36 (SF-36).

Results

Internal consistency was good, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.88. The reliability was excellent, with an ICC of 0.87. The SEM was 3.3 and the SDC was 9 points (on a scale of 0–48). Regarding the construct validity, 80 % of the results were in accordance with the hypotheses, including a high correlation (0.82) with the WOSI. No floor or ceiling effects were found.

Conclusions

The Dutch version of the OSIS showed good reliability and validity in a cohort of patients with shoulder instability.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 van der Linde et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Leroux T, Wasserstein D, Veillette C, Khoshbin A, Henry P, Chahal J et al.. Epidemiology of primary anterior shoulder dislocation requiring closed reduction in Ontario, Canada. Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42:442-50.
• [2]Liavaag S, Svenningsen S, Reikeras O, Enger M, Fjalestad T, Pripp AH et al.. The epidemiology of shoulder dislocations in Oslo. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011; 21:e334-40.
• [3]Zacchilli MA, Owens BD. Epidemiology of shoulder dislocations presenting to emergency departments in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92:542-9.
• [4]Janse AJ, Gemke RJ, Uiterwaal CS, van dT I, Kimpen JL, Sinnema G. Quality of life: patients and doctors don’t always agree: a meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004; 57:653-61.
• [5]Wright RW, Baumgarten KM. Shoulder outcomes measures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010; 18:436-44.
• [6]Irrgang JJ, Lubowitz JH. Measuring arthroscopic outcome. Arthroscopy. 2008; 24:718-22.
• [7]Poolman RW, Swiontkowski MF, Fairbank JC, Schemitsch EH, Sprague S, de Vet HC. Outcome instruments: rationale for their use. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91 Suppl 3:41-9.
• [8]Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The assessment of shoulder instability. The development and validation of a questionnaire. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81:420-6.
• [9]Steffen V, Hertel R. Rim reconstruction with autogenous iliac crest for anterior glenoid deficiency: forty-three instability cases followed for 5–19 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22:550-9.
• [10]Tan CK, Guisasola I, Machani B, Kemp G, Sinopidis C, Brownson P et al.. Arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study of absorbable versus nonabsorbable suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22:716-20.
• [11]van der Linde JA, van Kampen DA, Terwee CB, Dijksman LM, Kleinjan G, Willems WJ. Long-term results after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using suture anchors: an 8- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39:2396-403.
• [12]Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 15;25:3186-91.
• [13]Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993; 46:1417-32.
• [14]Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A et al.. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005; 8:94-104.
• [15]Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL et al.. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010; 19:539-49.
• [16]Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012; 21:651-7.
• [17]van Kampen DA, van Beers LW, Scholtes VA, Terwee CB, Willems WJ. Validation of the Dutch version of the simple shoulder test. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21:808-14.
• [18]de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Design of simple reliability studies. Measurement in medicine. Cambridge University Press, New York; 2011.
• [19]Dawson J, Rogers K, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The Oxford shoulder score revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009; 129:119-23.
• [20]van der Linde JA, Willems WJ, van Kampen DA, van Beers LW, van Deurzen DF, Terwee CB. Measurement properties of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index in Dutch patients with shoulder instability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014; 15:211. BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Godfrey J, Hamman R, Lowenstein S, Briggs K, Kocher M. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the simple shoulder test: psychometric properties by age and injury type. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16:260-7.
• [22]Berendes T, Pilot P, Willems J, Verburg H, te SR. Validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford Shoulder Score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19:829-36.
• [23]Veehof MM, Sleegers EJ, van Veldhoven NH, Schuurman AH, van Meeteren NL. Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV). J Hand Ther. 2002; 15:347-54.
• [24]Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H, Ng L. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26:764-72.
• [25]Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19:1109-20.
• [26]Cacchio A, Paoloni M, Griffin SH, Rosa F, Properzi G, Padua L et al.. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of an Italian version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 42:559-67.
• [27]Hatta T, Shinozaki N, Omi R, Sano H, Yamamoto N, Ando A et al.. Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) in the Japanese population. J Orthop Sci. 2011; 16:732-6.
• [28]Salomonsson B, Ahlstrom S, Dalen N, Lillkrona U. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI): validity, reliability, and responsiveness retested with a Swedish translation. Acta Orthop. 2009; 80:233-8.
• [29]Hofstaetter JG, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Hofstaetter SG, Wurnig C, Huber W. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the German version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010; 130:787-96.
• [30]Drerup S, Angst F, Griffin S, Flury MP, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI): translation and cross-cultural adaptation for use by German speakers. Orthopade. 2010; 39:711-8.
• [31]Lippitt SBHDIMFI. A practical tool for evaluating function: the Simple Shoulder Test. The shoulder: a balance of mobility and stability. Matsen FA III, Fu FH, Hawkins RJ, editors. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont (IL); 1993.
• [32]Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996; 78:593-600.
• [33]Frich LH, Noergaard PM, Brorson S. Validation of the Danish version of Oxford Shoulder Score. Dan Med Bull. 2011; 58:A4335.
• [34]Huber W, Hofstaetter JG, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Posch M, Wurnig C. The German version of the Oxford Shoulder Score—cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004; 124:531-6.
• [35]Murena L, Vulcano E, D'Angelo F, Monti M, Cherubino P. Italian cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Oxford Shoulder Score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19:335-41.
• [36]Roh YH, Noh JH, Kim W, Oh JH, Gong HS, Baek GH. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Oxford shoulder score. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 132:93-9.
• [37]Tugay U, Tugay N, Gelecek N, Ozkan M. Oxford Shoulder Score: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011; 131:687-94.
• [38]Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29:602-8.
• [39]Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001; 14:128-46.
• [40]Desai AS, Dramis A, Hearnden AJ. Critical appraisal of subjective outcome measures used in the assessment of shoulder disability. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010; 92:9-13.
• [41]Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ. 2002; 15;324:1417.
• [42]Salaffi F, De Angelis R, Stancati A, Grassi W. Health-related quality of life in multiple musculoskeletal conditions: a cross-sectional population based epidemiological study. II. The MAPPING study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005; 23:829-39.
• [43]Gartsman GM, Brinker MR, Khan M, Karahan M. Self-assessment of general health status in patients with five common shoulder conditions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998; 7:228-37.
• [44]Ostor AJ, Richards CA, Prevost AT, Speed CA, Hazleman BL. Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005; 44:800-5.
• [45]Snyder CF, Aaronson NK, Choucair AK, Elliott TE, Greenhalgh J, Halyard MY et al.. Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res. 2012; 21:1305-14.
• [46]Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J et al.. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60:34-42.
• [47]McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995; 4:293-307.
• [48]de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 59:1033-9.
• [49]Jensen KU, Bongaerts G, Bruhn R, Schneider S. Not all Rowe scores are the same! Which Rowe score do you use? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18:511-4.
• [50]Lillkrona U. How should we use the Constant Score?—A commentary. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17:362-3.
• [51]Schunemann HJ, Akl EA, Guyatt GH. Interpreting the results of patient reported outcome measures in clinical trials: the clinician's perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006; 4:62. BioMed Central Full Text