Sex and gender matter in health research: addressing health inequities in health research reporting

International Journal for Equity in Health

Ardath Whynacht³  Kimberly Gray¹  Jacqueline Gahagan² 

[1] Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;Gender & Health Promotion Studies Unit (GAHPS Unit), Head, Health Promotion Division, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada;Department of Sociology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB, Canada

关键词: Knowledge dissemination;    Methodology;    Health equity;    Sex and gender;   

Others  :  1133630
DOI  :  10.1186/s12939-015-0144-4

 received in 2014-08-29, accepted in 2015-01-20,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Attention to the concepts of ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ is increasingly being recognized as contributing to better science through an augmented understanding of how these factors impact on health inequities and related health outcomes. However, the ongoing lack of conceptual clarity in how sex and gender constructs are used in both the design and reporting of health research studies remains problematic. Conceptual clarity among members of the health research community is central to ensuring the appropriate use of these concepts in a manner that can advance our understanding of the sex- and gender-based health implications of our research findings. During the past twenty-five years much progress has been made in reducing both sex and gender disparities in clinical research and, to a significant albeit lesser extent, in basic science research. Why, then, does there remain a lack of uptake of sex- and gender-specific reporting of health research findings in many health research journals? This question, we argue, has significant health equity implications across all pillars of health research, from biomedical and clinical research, through to health systems and population health.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Gahagan et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Institute of Medicine: Sex-specific reporting of scientific research: A workshop summary. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC; 2012.
• [2]Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Gender, sex, and health research guide: a tool for CIHR applicants. Ottawa. 2014. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/32019.html. Accessed 2 Jan 2015.
• [3]Miller V, Rice M, Schiebinger L, Jenkins M, Werbinski J, Nunez A, et al.: Embedding concepts of sex and gender health differences into medical curricula. J Women’s Health 2013, 22:194-202.
• [4]Miller V: Why are sex and gender important to basic physiology and translational and individualized medicine? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2014, 306:H781-8.
• [5]European Association of Science Editors (EASE). EASE/ISTME joint conference: synopsis of gender session. Sept 24, 2013, Blankenberge, Belgium. 2013. http://www.ease.org.uk/sites/default/files/gender_session_summary_and_presentations.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2014.
• [6]Hammarström A, Annandale E. A conceptual muddle: an empirical analysis of the use of ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ in ‘gender-specific medicine’ journals. PLoS ONE. 2012. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034193.
• [7]Johnson J, Beaudet A: Sex and gender reporting in health research: why Canada should be a leader. Can J Public Health 2013, 104:e80-1.
• [8]Heidari S, Abdool Karim Q, Auerbach J, Buitendijk S, Cahn P, Curno M, et al. Gender-sensitive reporting in medical research. J Int AIDS Soc. 2012. doi:10.1186/1758-2652-15-11.
• [9]Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex and gender differences in health. EMBO Reports: Science & Society Series on Sex and Science. 2012. doi:10.1038/embor.2012.87.
• [10]Krieger N: Genders, sexes, and health: what are the connections and why does it matter? Int J Epidemiol 2003, 32:652-7.
• [11]Torgrimson B, Minson C: Sex and gender, what is the difference? J Appl Pyhsiol 2005, 99:785-7.
• [12]World Health Organization (WHO). Human rights and gender equality in health sector strategies. http://www.who.int/gender/documents/human_rights_tool/en/. Accessed 2 Jan 2015.
• [13]Nadeau G, Lippel K: From individual coping strategies to illness codification: the reflection of gender in social science research on multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS). Int J Equity Health 2014, 13:78. doi:10.1186/s12939-014-0078-2 BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]Johnson J, Sharman Z, Vissandjee B, Stewart DE: Does a change in health research funding policy related to the integration of sex and gender have an impact? PLoS One 2014, 9:e99900. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099900
• [15]Sharman Z, Johnson J: Towards the inclusion of gender and sex in health research and funding: an institutional perspective. Soc Sci Med 2012, 74:1812-6.
• [16]Hankivsky O, Reid C, Cormier R, Varcoe C, Clark N, Benoit C, et al.: Exploring the promises of intersectionality for advancing women’s health research. Int J Equity Health 2010, 9:5. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-9-5 BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Hosseinpoor AR, Williams JS, Jann B, Kowal P, Officer A, Posarac A, et al.: Social determinants of sex differences in disability among older adults: a multi-country decomposition analysis using the World Health Survey. Int J Equity Health 2012, 11:52. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-52 BioMed Central Full Text
• [18]Campos-Serna J, Ronda-Pérez E, Artazcoz L, Moen BE, Benavides FG: Gender inequalities in occupational health related to the unequal distribution of working and employment conditions: a systematic review. Int J Equity Health 2013, 12:57. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-12-57 BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Song Y, Bian Y: Gender differences in the use of health care in China: cross-sectional analysis. Int J Equity Health 2014, 13:8. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-13-8 BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Brankovic I, Verdonk P, Klinge I: Applying a gender lens on human papillomavirus infection: cervical cancer screening, HPV DNS testing, and HPV vaccination. Int J Equity Health 2013, 12:14. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-12-14 BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Oertelt-Prigone S, Parol R, Krohn S, Preissner R, Regitz-Zagrosek V: Analysis of sex and gender-specific research reveals a common increase in publications and marked differences between disciplines. BMC Med 2010, 8:70. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-70 BioMed Central Full Text
• [22]Pinn V: Sex and gender factors in medical studies: implications for health and clinical practice. JAMA 2003, 289:397-400.
• [23]Annandale E, Hammarström A: Constructing the gender-specific body: a critical discourse analysis of publications in the field of gender-specific medicine. Health 2011, 16:577-93.
• [24]Redberg R: Is what is good for the gander really good for the goose? Arch Intern Med 2009, 169:1460-1.
• [25]Gendered Innovations in Science: Health & Medicine, Engineering, and Environment. Sex and gender analysis policies of major granting agencies. 2014.
• [26]Gendered Innovations in Science: Health & Medicine, Engineering, and Environment. What is Gendered Innovations?. 2014.
• [27]European Commission: Gendered innovations: how gender analysis contributes to research. 2013.
• [28]Johnson P, Fitzgerald T, Salganicoff A, Wood SF, Goldstein JM: Sex-specific medical research: why women’s health can’t wait. A report of the Mary Horrigan Connors Center for Women’s Health & Gender Biology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. 2014.
• [29]National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH grants policy statement. Part two: terms and conditions. 2012.
• [30]Ritz A, Antle D, Cote J, Deroy K, Fraleigh N, Messing K, et al.: First steps for integrating sex and gender considerations into basic experimental biomedical research. FASEB J 2014, 28:1-10.