Schoolyard physical activity of 6–11 year old children assessed by GPS and accelerometry

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Sanne I de Vries²  Jolanda Maas³  Paula van Dommelen²  Reinier P Sterkenburg¹  Frank H Pierik¹  Dirk Dessing¹ 

[1] TNO, Department of Urban Environment and Safety, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands;TNO, Lifestyle, P.O. Box 2215, 2301 CE Leiden, The Netherlands;VU Medical Center, Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute, P.O Box 7057 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands

关键词: Global Positioning System (GPS);    Accelerometer;    Children;    Primary school;    Schoolyard;    Physical activity;   

Others  :  806625
DOI  :  10.1186/1479-5868-10-97

 received in 2012-10-25, accepted in 2013-08-14,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Children’s current physical activity levels are disturbingly low when compared to recommended levels. This may be changed by intervening in the school environment. However, at present, it is unclear to what extent schoolyard physical activity contributes towards reaching the daily physical activity guideline. The aim of this study was to examine how long and at what intensity children are physically active at the schoolyard during different time segments of the day. Moreover, the contribution of schoolyard physical activity towards achieving the recommended guideline for daily physical activity was investigated.

Methods

Children (n=76) between the age of 6–11 years were recruited in six different schools in five cities (>70.000 residents) in the Netherlands. During the weekdays of a regular school week, childrens’ physical activity and location were measured with ActiGraph accelerometers and Travelrecorder GPS receivers. Data was collected from December 2008 to April 2009. From the data, the amount of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) on and outside the schoolyard was established. Moreover, the percentage of MVPA on the schoolyard was compared between the following segments of the day: pre-school, school, school recess, lunch break and post-school. Differences between boys and girls were compared using linear and logistic mixed-effects models.

Results

On average, children spent 40.1 minutes/day on the schoolyard. During this time, boys were more active on the schoolyard, with 27.3% of their time spent as MVPA compared to 16.7% among girls (OR=2.11 [95% CI 1.54 - 2.90]). The children were most active on the schoolyard during school recess, during which boys recorded 39.5% and girls recorded 23.4% of the time as MVPA (OR=2.55 [95% CI: 1.69 - 3.85]). Although children were only present at the schoolyard for 6.1% of the total reported time, this time contributed towards 17.5% and 16.8% of boys’ and girls’ minutes of MVPA.

Conclusions

On the schoolyard, children’s physical activity levels are higher than on average over the whole day. Physical activity levels are particularly high during school recess. The school environment seems to be an important setting for improving children’s physical activity levels. Further research on the facilitators of these high activity levels may provide targets for further promotion of physical activity among children.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Dessing et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Andersen LB, Riddoch C, Kriemler S, Hills A: Physical activity and cardiovascular risk factors in children. Br J Sports Med 2011, 45:871-876.
• [2]Biddle SJH, Asare M: Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: a review of reviews. Br J Sports Med 2011, 45:886-895.
• [3]Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJ, Daniels SR, Dishman RK, Gutin B, Hergenroeder AC, Must A, Nixon PA, Pivarnik JM, Rowland T, Trost S, Trudeau F: Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr 2005, 146:732-737.
• [4]Ekelund U, Tomkinson G, Armstrong N: What proportion of youth are physically active? Measurement issues, levels and recent time trends. Br J Sports Med 2011, 45:859-865.
• [5]de Vries SI, Chorus AMJ, Verheijden M: Bewegen in Nederland: jeugdigen van 4–17 jaar. In TNO Trendrapport Bewegen en Gezondheid. Edited by Hildebrandt VH, Chorus AMJ, Stubbe JH. Leiden: De Bink; 2010:57-76. in Dutch
• [6]Kemper HGC, Ooijendijk WTM, Stiggelbout M: Consensus over de Nederlandse Norm voor Gezond Bewegen. Tijdschr Soc Gezondheidsz 2000, 78:180-183. [in Dutch]
• [7]World Health Organization: Global recommendations on physical activity for health. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599979_eng.pdf webcite
• [8]Kjonniksen L, Torsheim T, Wold B: Tracking of leisure-time physical activity during adolescence and young adulthood: a 10-year longitudinal study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008, 5:69. BioMed Central Full Text
• [9]Telama R, Yang X, Viikari J, Välimäki I, Wanne O, Raitakari O: Physical activity from childhood to adulthood: a 21-year tracking study. Am J Prev Med 2005, 28:267-273.
• [10]Richards L, Gauvin L, Raine K: Ecological models revisited: their uses and evolution in health promotion over two decades. Annu Rev Public Health 2011, 32:307-326.
• [11]de Vries SI, Bakker I, van Mechelen W, Hopman-Rock M: Determinants of activity-friendly neighborhoods for children: results from the SPACE study. Am J Health Promot 2007, 21(4):312-316.
• [12]Jones AP, Coombes EG, Griffin SJ, van Sluijs EM: Environmental supportiveness for physical activity in English schoolchildren: a study using Global Positioning Systems. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009, 6:42. BioMed Central Full Text
• [13]Wheeler BW, Cooper AR, Page AS, Jago R: Greenspace and children’s physical activity: a GPS/GIS analysis of the PEACH Project. Prev Med 2010, 51:148-152.
• [14]Wechsler H, Devereaux RS, Davis M, Collins J: Using the school environment to promote physical activity and healthy eating. Prev Med 2000, 31:s121-s137.
• [15]Gidlow CJ, Cochrane T, Davey R, Smith H: In-school and out-of-school physical activity in primary and secondary school children. J Sports Sci 2008, 26:1411-1419.
• [16]Haug E, Torsheim T, Sallis JF, Samdal O: The characteristics of the outdoor environment associated with physical activity. Health Educ Res 2010, 25:248-256.
• [17]Nettlefold L, McKay HA, Warburton DER, McGuire KA, Bredin SSD, Naylor PJ: The challenge of low physical activity during the school day: at recess, lunch and physical education. Br J Sport Med 2011, 45:813-819.
• [18]Ridgers ND, Saint-Maurice PF, Welk GJ, Siahpush M, Huberty J: Differences in physical activity during school recess. J Sch Health 2011, 81:545-551.
• [19]McGall SE, McGuigan MR, Nottle C: Contribution of free play towards physical activity guidelines for New Zealand primary school children aged 7–9 years. Br J Sports Med 2011, 45:120-124.
• [20]Kerr J, Duncan S, Schipperijn J: Using Global Positioning Systems in health research. Am J Prev Med 2011, 41:532-540.
• [21]de Vries SI, Hopman-Rock M, Bakker I, Hirasing RA, van Mechelen W: Built environmental correlates of walking and cycling in Dutch urban children: results from the SPACE study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010, 7(5):2309-2324.
• [22]Nilsson A, Ekelund UL, Yngve A, Sjostrom M: Assessing physical activity among children using different time sampling intervals and placements. Pediatr Excerc Sci 2002, 14:87-96.
• [23]Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH: Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 2000, 320:1240-1243.
• [24]Esliger DW, Copeland JL, Barnes JD, Tremblay MS: Standardizing and optimizing the use of accelerometer data for free-living physical activity monitoring. J Phys Act Health 2005, 3:366-383.
• [25]Cliff DP, Reilly JJ, Okely AD: Methodological considerations in using accelerometers to assess habitual physical activity in children aged 0–5 years. J Sci Med Sport 2009, 12:557-567.
• [26]Trost SG, Loprinzi PD, Moore R, Pfeiffer KA: Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011, 43:1360-1368.
• [27]Evenson KR, Cattellier D, Gill K, Ondrak K, McMurray RG: Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci 2008, 26:1557-1565.
• [28]Information on URBIS III: GIS Software. http://www.tno.nl/Urbis webcite
• [29]Information on Kadaster, the Dutch land use register. http://www.kadaster.nl/web/artikel/productartikel/TOP10NL.htm webcite
• [30]Ridgers ND, Stratton G, Fairclough SJ: Physical activity levels of children during school playtime. Sports Med 2006, 36:359-371.
• [31]Trudeau F, Shephard RJ: Physical education, school physical activity, school sports and academic performance. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008, 5:10. BioMed Central Full Text
• [32]Riddoch CJ, Mattocks C, Deere K, Saunders J, Kirkby J, Tilling K, Leary SD, Blair S, Ness A: Objective measurement of levels and patterns of physical activity. Arch Dis Child 2007, 92:963-969.
• [33]Ridgers ND, Salmon JG, Ridley K, O’Connel E, Arundell L, Timperio A: Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012, 9:15. BioMed Central Full Text
• [34]Ickes MJ, Erwin H, Beighie A: Systematic review of recess interventions to increase physical activity. J Phys Act Health 2013, 10:910-926.
• [35]Basch CE: Physical activity and the achievement gap among urban minority youth. J Sch Health 2011, 81(10):626-634.
• [36]Salmon J, Arundell L, Hume C, Brown H, Hesketh K, Dunstan DW, Daly RM, Pearson N, Cerin E, Moodie M, Sheppard L, Ball K, Bagley S, Crawford D: A cluster-randomized controlled trial to reduce sedentary behavior and promote physical activity and health of 8–9 year olds: the Transform-Us! study. BMC Pub Health 2011, 11(1):759. BioMed Central Full Text
• [37]Mahar MT: Impact of short bouts of physical activity on attention-to-task in elementary school children. Prev Med 2011, 52:S60-S64.
• [38]Hind K, Torgerson D, McKenna J, Ashby R, Daly-Smith A, Truscott J, Mackay H: Developing interventions for children’s exercise (D.I.C.E.): a pilot evaluation of school-based exercise interventions for primary school children aged 7 to 8 years. J Phys Act Healthin press [Epub ahead of print]
• [39]Gao Z, Hannan P, Xiang P, Stodden DF, Valdez VE: Video game–based exercise, Latino Children’s physical health, and academic achievement. Am J Prev Med 2013, 44(3):S240-S246.
• [40]Thompson AM, Baxter-Jones AD, Mirwald RL, Bailey DA: Comparison of physical activity in male and female children: does maturation matter? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003, 35:1684-1690.
• [41]Blatchford P, Baines E, Pellegrini AD: The social context of school playground games: sex and ethnic difference, and changes over time after entry to junior school. Br J Dev Psychol 2003, 21:481-505.
• [42]Sallis JF, Conway L, Prochaska JJ, McKenzie TL, Marshall MS, Brown M: The association of school environments with youth physical activity. Am J Public Health 2001, 91:618-620.
• [43]de Vries SI, Hopman-Rock M, Bakker I, van Mechelen W: Meeting the 60-minute physical activity guideline: effect of operationalisation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009, 41:81-86.
• [44]Duncan JS, Badland HM, Schofield G: Combining GPS with heart rate monitoring to measure physical activity in children: a feasibility study. J Sci Med Sport 2009, 12(5):583-585.
• [45]Fisher A, Reilly JJ, Montgomery C, Kelly LA, Williamson DM, Jackson DM, Paton JY, Grant S: Seasonality in physical activity and sedentary behaviour in young children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2005, 17:31-40.
• [46]Ridgers ND, Stratton G, Fairclough SJ, Twisk TW: Long-term effects of playground markings and physical structures on children’s recess physical activity levels. Prev Med 2007, 44:393-397.
• [47]Jago R, Baranowski T: Non-curricular approaches for increasing physical activity in youth: a review. Prev Med 2004, 39:157-163.
• [48]Verstraete SJM, Cardon GM, de Clercq DLR, de Bourdeaudhuil IMM: Increasing children’s physical activity levels during recess in elementary schools: the effects of providing game equipment. Eur J Public Health 2006, 16:415-419.