Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the South African Pain Catastrophizing Scale (SA-PCS) among patients with fibromyalgia

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Michael J Sullivan²  Quinette A Louw³  Karen A Grimmer-Somers¹  Linzette D Morris³ 

[1] International Centre for Allied Health Evidence (iCAHE), University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia;Departments of Psychology, Medicine and Neurology, Canada Research Chair in Behavioural Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa

关键词: South Africa;    Psychometric properties;    Validation;    Cross-cultural adaptation;    Pain catastrophizing scale;    Outcome measures;    Pain catastrophizing;    Chronic pain;    Fibromyalgia;   

Others  :  824898
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7525-10-137

 received in 2012-06-08, accepted in 2012-11-09,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Pain catastrophization has recently been recognized as a barrier to the healthy development of physical functioning among chronic pain patients. Levels of pain catastrophization in chronic pain patients are commonly measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS).

Objective

To cross-culturally adapt and validate the South African PCS (SA-PCS) among English-, Afrikaans- and Xhosa-speaking patients with fibromyalgia living in the Cape Metropole area, Western Cape, South Africa.

Methods

The original PCS was cross-culturally adapted in accordance with international standards to develop an English, Afrikaans and Xhosa version of the SA-PCS using a repeated measures study design. Psychometric testing included face/content validity, internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha-α), test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient correlations-ICC), sensitivity-to-change and cross-sectional convergent validity (by comparing the adapted SA-PCS to related constructs).

Results

The cross-culturally adapted English, Afrikaans and Xhosa SA-PCS showed good face and content validity, excellent internal consistency (with Chronbach’s α = 0.98, 0.98 and 0.97 for the English, Afrikaans and Xhosa SA-PCS, as a whole, respectively), excellent test-retest reliability (with ICC’s of 0.90, 0.91 and 0.89 for the English, Afrikaans and Xhosa SA-PCS, respectively); as well as satisfactory sensitivity-to-change (with a minimum detectable change of 8.8, 9.0 and 9.3 for the English, Afrikaans and Xhosa SA-PCS, respectively) and cross-sectional convergent validity (when compared to pain severity as well as South African versions of the Tampa scale for Kinesiophobia and the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire).

Conclusion

The SA-PCS can therefore be recommended as simple, efficient, valid and reliable tool which shows satisfactory sensitivity-to-change and cross-sectional convergent validity, for use among English, Afrikaans and Xhosa-speaking patients with fibromyalgia attending the public health sector in the Western Cape area of South Africa.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Morris et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Turk DC: Understanding pain sufferers: The role of cognitive processes. Spine 2004, 4:1-7.
• [2]de Rooij A, Steultjens M, Siemonsma P, Vollebregt J, Roorda L, Beuving W, Dekker J: Overlap of cognitive concepts in chronic widespread pain: An exploratory study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011, 12:218. BioMed Central Full Text
• [3]Keefe FJ, Rumble ME, Scipio CD, Giordano LA, Perri LC: Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science. J Pain 2004, 5:195-211.
• [4]Gatchel RJ, Peng YB, Peters ML, Fuchs PN, Turk DC: The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull 2007, 133:581-624.
• [5]Edwards RR, Bingham CO III, Bathon J, Haythornthwaite JA: Catastrophizing and pain in arthritis, fibromyalgia and other rheumatic disease. Arthritis Rheum 2006, 55:325-332.
• [6]Quartana PJ, Campbell CM, Edwards RR: Pain catastrophizing: a critical review. Expert Reviews of Neurotherapeutics 2009, 9:745-758.
• [7]Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR: The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995, 7:524-532.
• [8]Engel-Yeger B, Dunn W: Relationship between pain catastrophizing level and sensory processing patterns in typical adults. Am J Occup Ther 2011, 65:E1-E10.
• [9]Hassett AL, Cone JD, Patella SJ, Sigal LH: The role of catastrophizing in the pain and depression of women with fibromyalgia syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2000, 43:2493-2500.
• [10]Jones K, Liptan G: Exercise Interventions in Fibromyalgia: Clinical Applications from the Evidence. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 2009, 35:373-391.
• [11]Oliver K, Cronan T: Predictors of Exercise Behaviors among Fibromyalgia Patients. Prev Med 2002, 35:383-389.
• [12]Rodero B, Garcia-Campayo J, Casaneuva-Fernandez B, Sobradiel N: Imagined exposure as treatment of catastrophizing in fibromyalgia: a pilot study. Actas Esp Psiquiatr 2008, 36:223-226.
• [13]Osman A, Barrios FX, Gutierrez PM, Kopper BA, Merrifield T, Grittmann L: The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Further psychometric evaluation with adult samples. J Behav Med 2000, 23:351-365.
• [14]Marić A, Banožic A, Ćosić A, Kraljević S, Sapunar D, Puljak L: Validation of the Croatian Pain Catastrophizing scale through a study on the influence of medical education on pain catastrophizing. Period Biol 2011, 113:171-175.
• [15]Severeijns R, Vlaeyen JWS, van den Hout MA, Weber WEJ: Pain Catastrophizing predicts pain intensity, disability, and psychological distress independent of the level of physical impairment. Clin J Pain 2001, 17:165-172.
• [16]Picavet HSJ, Vlaeyen JWS, Schouten JSAG: Pain Catastrophizing and Kinesiophobia: Predictors of chronic low back pain. Am J Epidemiol 2002, 156:1028-1034.
• [17]Chopra A, Abdel-Nasser A: Epidemiology of rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders in the developing world. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2008, 22:583-604.
• [18]Derman W, Whitesman S, Dreyer M, Patel M, Patel D, Nossel C, Schwellnus M: Healthy lifestyle interventions in general practice: Part 16: Lifestyle and fibromyalgia. S Afr Fam Pract 2011, 53:511-515.
• [19]Igumbor E, Puoane T, Gansky S, Plesh O: Chronic pain in the community: a survey in a township in Mthatha, Eastern Cape, South Africa. South Afr J Anaesth Analg 2011, 17:329-337.
• [20]Louw QA, Morris LD, Grimmer-Somers KA: The prevalence of Low Back Pain in Africa: A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007, 8:105. BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Frohlich E, Shipton E: Can the development of pain management units be justified in an emerging democracy? SAMJ 2007, 97:827-828.
• [22]Naidoo S, Kromhout H, London L, Naidoo RN, Burdorf A: Musculoskeletal pain in women working in small-scale agriculture in South Africa. Am J Ind Med 2009, 52:202-209.
• [23]Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G: Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 1998, 23:2003-2013.
• [24]Mousavi S, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, Montazeri A, Mobini B: The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec back Pain Disability Scale: Translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions. Spine 2006, 31:E454-459.
• [25]Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D: Cross-cultural adaptation of healthrelated quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993, 6:1417-1432.
• [26]Gonzalez-Calvo J, Gonzalez VM, Lorig K: Cultural diversity issues in the development of valid and reliable measures of health status. Arthritis Care Res 1997, 10:448-456.
• [27]Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M: Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000, 25:3186-3191.
• [28]Cook C, Richardson J, Braga L, Menezes A, SOler X, Kume P, Zaninelle M, Socolows F, Pietrobon R: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Spine 2006, 31:1321-1327.
• [29]Le Gal M, Mainguy Y, Le Lay K, Nadjar A, Allain D, Galissié M: Linguistic validation of six patient-reported outcomes instruments into 12 languages for patients with fibromyalgia. Joint Bone Spine 2010, 77:165-170.
• [30]Beaton D, Richards R: Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998, 7:565-572.
• [31]South African (SA) Venues (SA languages and cultures)[http://www.sa-venues.com/sa_languages_and_culture.htm] webciteNet Focus Interactive; 2012.
• [32]South African Government[http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0302/P03022010.pdf] webcite 2012.
• [33][http://www.mapi-trust.org] webciteMAPI Research Trust; 2012.
• [34]Monticone M, Baiardi P, Ferrari S, Foti C, Mugnai R, Pillastrini P, Rocca B, Vanti C: Development of the Italian version of the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS-I): cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Qual Life Research 2011, 21:1045-1050.
• [35]Pallegama RW, Ariyawardana SPAG, Ranasinghe AW, Sitheeque MAM, Glaros A: Validation of the Sinhala version of Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Proceedings of the Peradeniya University Research Sessions 2009, 14:94-96.
• [36]Garcia-Campayo J, Rodero B, Alda M, Sobradiel N, Montero J, Moreno S: Validation of the Spanish version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in fibromyalgia. Medicina Clı’nica (Barc) 2008, 131:487-492.
• [37]Meyer K, Sprott H, Mannion AF: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. J Psychosom Res 2008, 64:469-478.
• [38]Miró J, Nieto R, Huguet A: The Catalan version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale: A useful instrument to assess catastrophic thinking in whiplash patients. J Pain 2008, 9:397-406.
• [39]Yap JC, Lau J, Chen PP, Gin T, Wong Y, Chan I, Chu J, Wong E: Validation of the Chinese Pain Catastrophizing Scale (HK-PCS) in patients with chronic pain. Pain Med 2008, 9:186-195.
• [40]Tremblay I, Beaulieu Y, Bernier A, Crombez G, Laliberté S, Thibult P, Velly A, Sullivan M: Pain catastrophizing scale for francophone adolescents: a preliminary validation. Pain Res Manag 2008, 13:19-24.
• [41]French D, Noël M, Vigneau F, French J, Cyr C, Evans T: L’Échelle de dramatisation face á la douleur PCS-CF: Adaptation canadienne en langue française de l’échelle Pain catastrophizing scale./PCS-CF: A French-Canadian adaptation of the Pain Catastrophizing scale. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement 2005, 37:181-192.
• [42]Crombez G, Vlaeyen JWS, Heuts PHTG, Lysens R: Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: Evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic low back pain disability. Pain 1999, 80:329-339.
• [43]Roelofs J, Sluiter J, Frings-Dresen M, Goossens M, Thibult P, Boersma K, Vlaeyen J: Fear of movement and (re)injury in chronic musculoskeletal pain: Evidence for an invariant two-factor model of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia across pain diagnoses and Dutch, Swedish, and Canadian samples. Pain 2007, 131:181-190.
• [44]Bennett MI, Bagnall AM, Closs J: How effective are patient-based educational interventions in the management of cancer pain? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 2009, 143:192-199.
• [45]Burckhardt CS, Clark SR, Bennet RM: The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire: development and validation. J Rheumatol 1991, 18:728-733.
• [46]Department of Health (UK): Physical Activity Policy/Health Improvement Directorate: General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire. A screening tool to assess adult physical activity levels, within primary care. 2010. Retrieved on June 15 2010 from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/@ps/documents/digitalasset/dh_112134.pdf webcite
• [47]Bergner M, Rothman ML: Health status measures: an overview and guide for selection. Annu Rev Public Health 1987, 8:191-210.
• [48]DeVon H, Block M, Moyle-Wright P, Ernst D, Hayden S, Lazzara D, Savoy S, Kostas-Polstan E: A Psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2007, 39:155-164.
• [49]Osburn HG: Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients. Psychol Methods 2000, 5:343-355.
• [50]Siegle D: [http:/ / www.gifted.uconn.edu/ siegle/ research/ Instrument%20Reliability%20and%20Va lidity/ Reliability.htm] webciteReliability calculator. 2005.
• [51]Koch GG: “Intraclass correlation coefficient”. In Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. 4. Edited by Samuel K, Johnson NL. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1982.
• [52]Müller E, Büttner P: A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Stat Med 1994, 13:2465-2476.
• [53]Brown J: Questions and answers about language testing statistics: Standard error vs. Standard error of measurement. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter 1999, 3:20-25.
• [54]Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL, Guyatt GH: Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1. Phys Ther 1998, 78:1186-1196.
• [55]Riddle DL, Stratford PW, Binkley JM: Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 2. Phys Ther 1998, 78:1197-1207.
• [56]Varni J, Burwinkle T, Seid M: The PedsQL™ as a pediatric patient-reported outcome: reliability and validity of the PedsQL™ Measurement Model in 25,000 children. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2005, 5:705-719.
• [57]Lame’ IE, Peters ML, Kessels AG, Van Kleef M, Patijn J: Test-retest stability of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Tampa scale for Kinesiophobia in chronic pain over a longer period of time. J Health Psychol 2008, 13:820-826.
• [58]DeCoster J: [http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html] webciteOverview of Factor Analysis. 1998.