Effects of corn gluten feed inclusion at graded levels in a corn-soybean diet on the ileal and fecal digestibility of growing pigs

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

Ericka Ramírez Rodríguez²  Tércia Cesária Reis de Souza¹  Gerardo Mariscal Landín² 

[1] Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Santiago de Querétaro, Av. De las Ciencias s/n Juriquilla 76000, Querétaro, Querétaro, México;Centro Nacional de Investigación en Fisiología Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Km 1, Carretera a Colón, Ajuchitlán Colón, Querétaro 76280, México

关键词: Total tract digestibility;    Pigs;    Ileal digestibility;    Energy;    Corn gluten feed;    Amino acids;   

Others  :  1139227
DOI  :  10.1186/2049-1891-5-40

 received in 2014-03-27, accepted in 2014-08-11,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

This study aimed to determine the effect of the inclusion of corn gluten feed (CGF) on the apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids and the apparent ileal and total tract digestibility of energy in growing pigs. The study was performed using 16 barrows (weight, 45.3 ± 4.5 kg) that were fitted with a T cannula at the terminal ileum. There were four treatments: a corn-soybean diet without CGF and three corn-soybean diets containing increasing levels of CGF (65, 130, and 195 g/kg). Data were analyzed according to a randomized complete block design, four blocks with four pigs each (one pig per treatment). The trend of the response (linear or quadratic) was determined using orthogonal contrasts, and when a linear effect was determined, a linear equation was obtained.

Results

The results showed that the inclusion up to 195 g/kg of CGF in the corn-soybean diet did not diminish the ileal digestibility (apparent and standardized) of protein and amino acids (P > 0.05), except that of phenylalanine, cystine, and proline. A linear decrease (P < 0.05) per gram of CGF added to the diet in the apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of phenylalanine (0.011 and 0.015 percentage units, respectively), cystine (0.048 and 0.043 percentage units, respectively), and proline (0.045 and 0.047 percentage units, respectively) was noted. Similarly, ileal digestibility of dry matter and energy were adversely affected (reduced by 0.028 and 0.025 percentage units, respectively, per gram of CGF increment in the diet). A significant (P < 0.05) linear reduction in total tract digestibility with increase in CGF amount in the diet was observed for energy (0.027 percentage units), dry matter (0.027 percentage units), crude protein (0.020 percentage units), and neutral detergent fiber (0.041 percentage units) per gram of CGF added to the diet.

Conclusion

CGF did not affect the ileal digestibility of protein and most amino acids but reduced the ileal and total tract digestibility of energy.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Mariscal Landín et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]FAO: FAOSTAT Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. 2010.
• [2]Blasi DA, Drouillard J, Brouk MJ, Montgomory SP: Corn Gluten Feed, Composition and Feeding Value for Beef and Dairy Cattle . In Corn Gluten Feed, Composition and Feeding Value for Beef and Dairy Cattle. Manhattan: Kansas State University; 2001. 14 pages
• [3]Yen JT, Brooks JD, Jensen AH: Metabolizable energy value of corn gluten feed. J Anim Sci 1974, 39:335-337.
• [4]INRA: Tables de composition et de valeur nutritive des matières premières destinées aux animaux d’élevage. Porcs, volailles, bovins, ovins, caprins, lapins, chevaux, poissons. Paris, France: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; 2002.
• [5]NRC: Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th edition. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press; 1998.
• [6]Ma QG, Metzler BU, Eklund M, Ji C, Mosenthin R: The effects of cellulose, pectin and starch on standardized ileal and apparent total tract amino acid digestibilities and bacterial contribution of amino acids in feces of growing pigs. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 2008, 21:873-882.
• [7]Myrie SB, Bertolo RF, Sauer WC, Ball RO: Effect of common antinutritive factors and fibrous feedstuffs in pig diets on amino acids digestibilities with special emphasis in threonine. J Anim Sci 2008, 86:609-619.
• [8]Mariscal-Landín G, Reis de Souza TC, Hernández DAA, Escobar GK: Pérdidas endógenas de nitrógeno y aminoácidos en cerdos y su aplicación en la estimación de los coeficientes de digestibilidad ileal de la proteína y aminoácidos de las materias primas. Téc Pecu Méx 2009, 47:371-388.
• [9]Schulze H, van Leeuwen P, Verstegen MWA, Huisman J, Souffrant WB, Ahrens F: Effect of level of dietary neutral detergent fiber on ileal apparent digestibility and ileal nitrogen losses in pigs. J Anim Sci 1994, 72:2362-2368.
• [10]Diario Oficial de la Federación: Especificaciones técnicas para la producción, cuidado y uso de los animales de laboratorio. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-062-ZOO-1999. Diario Oficial de la Federación, Segunda Sección, Miércoles 22 de Agosto 2001.
• [11]International guiding principles for biomedical research involving animals The development of science-based guidelines for laboratory animal care-NCBI Bookshelf[http://cioms.ch/publications/guidelines/1985_texts_of_guidelines.htm webcite]
• [12]de Reis de Souza TC, Mar BB, Mariscal LG: Canulación de cerdos posdestete para pruebas de digestibilidad ileal: Desarrollo de una metodología. Téc Pecu Méx 2000, 38:143-150.
• [13]INRA: L’alimentation des animaux monogastriques: porc, lapin, volailles. Paris, France: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; 1984.
• [14]Fenton TW, Fenton M: An improved procedure for determination of chromic oxide in feed and feces. Can J Anim Sci 1979, 59:631-634.
• [15]Adeola O: Digestion and balance technique in pigs. In Swine Nutrition. 2nd edition. Edited by Lewis AJ, Southern LL. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press; 2001:903-916.
• [16]AOAC: Official Methods of Analysis. 17th edition. Arlington, VA. USA: Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem; 2000.
• [17]van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA: Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991, 74:3583-3597.
• [18]Henderson JH, Ricker RD, Bidlingmeyer BA, Woodward C: Rapid, accurate and reproducible HPLC analysis of amino acids. Amino acid analysis using Zorbax Eclipse AAA columns and the Agilent 1100 HPLC. Agilent technologies 2000. 10 pag. Agilent technologies homepage [http://www.agilent.com/chem/supplies webcite]
• [19]Fan MZ, Sauer WC: Determination of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in barley and canola meal for pigs with the direct, difference, and regression methods. J Anim Sci 1995, 73:2364-2374.
• [20]Furuya S, Kaji Y: Estimation of the true ileal digestibility of amino acids and nitrogen from their apparent values for growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1989, 26:271-285.
• [21]Mariscal-Landín G, Reis de Souza TC: Endogenous ileal losses of nitrogen and amino acids in pigs and piglets fed graded levels of casein. Arch Anim Nutr 2006, 60:454-466.
• [22]Steel RGD, Torrie JH: Principles and procedures of statistics. A Biometrical approach. 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
• [23]SAS version 9.2: Book Statistical Analysis Systems Institute User’s guide. 92nd edition. Cary NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2008.
• [24]Le Gall M, Montagne L, Meunier-Salaün MC, Noblet J: Valeurs nutritives des fibres, conséquences sur la santé du porcelet et le bien-être de la truie. INRA Prod Anim 2009, 22:17-24.
• [25]Kawauchi IM, Sakomura NK, Vasconcellos RS, de-Oliveira LD, Gomes MOS, Loureiro BA, Carciofi AC: Digestibility and metabolizable energy of maize gluten feed for dogs as measured by two different techniques. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011, 169:96-103.
• [26]Mariscal-Landín G, Sève B, Collèaux Y, LeBreton Y: Endogenous amino nitrogen collected from pigs with end to end ileorectal anastomosis is affected by the method of estimation and altered by dietary fiber. J Nutr 1995, 125:136-146.
• [27]Reverter M, Lindberg JE: Ileal digestibility of amino acids in pigs given a barley-based diet with increasing inclusion of Lucerne meal. Anim Sci 1998, 67:131-138.
• [28]Laubin B, Lullien-Pellerin V, Nadaud I, Gaillard-Martinie B, Chambon C, Branlard G: Isolation of the wheat aleurona layer for 2D electrophoresis and proteomic analysis. J Cereal Sci 2008, 48:709-714.
• [29]Bach Knudsen KE: The nutritional significance of “dietary fibre” analysis. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2001, 90:3-20.
• [30]Li S, Sauer WC, Hardin RT: Effect of dietary fibre level on amino acid digestibility in young pigs. Can J Anim Sci 1994, 74:327-333.
• [31]Dégen L, Halas B, Babinszky L: Effect of dietary fibre on protein and fat digestibility and its consequences on diet formulation for growing and fattening pigs: A review. Acta Agric Scand Sect A Anim Sci 2007, 57:1-9.
• [32]Sun T, Li S, Ren H: Profilin as a regulator of the membrane-actin cytoskeleton interface in plant cells. Front Plant Sci 2013, 4:512.
• [33]Williamson MP: The structure and function of proline-rich regions in proteins. Biochem J 1994, 297:249-260.
• [34]Bjergegaar C, Sørensen H, Sørensen S: Dietary fibres-important parts of high quality food and feeds. J Anim Feed Sci 1997, 6:145-161.
• [35]Ngoc T, Len N, Lindberg J: Impact of fibre intake and fibre source on digestibility, gut development, retention time and growth performance of indigenous and exotic pigs. Animal 2013, 7:736-745.
• [36]Caspar W: The role of dietary fibre in the digestive physiology of the pig. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2001, 90:21-33.
• [37]Wong J, Jenkins D: Carbohydrate digestibility and metabolic effects. J Nutr 2007, 137:2539S-2546S.
• [38]Hansen MJ, Chwalibog A, Tausson AH, Sawosz E: Influence of different fibre sources on digestibility and nitrogen and energy balances in growing pigs. Arch Anim Nutr 2006, 60:390-401.
• [39]Montagne L, Piel C, Lallès JP: Effect of Diet on Mucin Kinetics and Composition: Nutrition and Health Implications. Nutr Rev 2004, 62:105-114.
• [40]Shi XS, Noblet J: Digestible and metabolizable energy values of ten feed ingredients in growing pigs fed ad libitum and sows fed at maintenance level; comparative contribution of the hindgut. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1993, 42:223-236.
• [41]Kerr BJ, Shurson GC: Strategies to improve fiber utilization in swine. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2013, 4:11. BioMed Central Full Text