A critical analysis of the cycles of physical activity policy in England

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Adrian Bauman²  Karen Milton¹ 

[1] Research Fellow, School of Public Health, Level 6 Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Building D17, Sydney 2006, NSW, Australia;Sesquicentenary Professor of Public Health, School of Public Health, Level 6 Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Building D17, Sydney 2006, NSW, Australia

关键词: Public education;    Surveillance;    Recommendations;    Policy;    Physical activity;   

Others  :  1136041
DOI  :  10.1186/s12966-015-0169-5

 received in 2014-07-15, accepted in 2015-01-13,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

There has been increasing focus on the importance of national policy to address population levels of physical inactivity. Components of a comprehensive national physical activity policy framework include: 1) national recommendations on physical activity levels; 2) setting population goals and targets; 3) surveillance or health monitoring systems; and 4) public education. The aim of the current paper was to analyse the policy actions which have addressed each of these elements in England and to identify areas of progress and remaining challenges.

Methods

A literature search was undertaken to identify past and present documents relevant to physical activity policy in England. Each document was analysed to identify content relevant to the four key elements of policy which formed the focus of the current research.

Results

Physical activity recommendations are an area where England has demonstrated a robust scientific approach and good practice; however, the physical activity campaigns in England have not been sufficiently sustained to achieve changes in social norms and behaviour. The setting of physical activity targets has been unrealistic and continuous changes to national surveillance measures have presented challenges for monitoring trends over time.

Conclusions

Overall, physical activity policy in England has fluctuated over the past two decades. The variations and cycles in policy reflect some of the challenges in implementing and sustaining physical activity policy in the face of political changes, changes in government direction, and changing opportunities to profile active lifestyles.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Milton and Bauman; licensee BioMed Central.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]World Health Organization: Global status report on noncommunicable disease 2010. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2011.
• [2]World Health Organization: Global strategy for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2000.
• [3]Health and Social Care Information Centre. Health Survey for England, 2012. [http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB13218].
• [4]Department of Health: Let’s Get Moving commissioning guidance - A physical activity care pathway. Department of Health, London; 2009.
• [5]World Health Organization: Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2004.
• [6]Daugbjerg S, Kahlmeier S, Racioppi F, Martin-Diener E, Martin B, Oja P, et al.: Promotion of physical activity in the European region: content analysis of 27 national policy documents. J Phys Act Heal 2009, 6:805-17.
• [7]United Nations General Assembly: Political declaration of the high-level meeting of the General Assembly on the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases. United Nations General Assembly, New York; 2011.
• [8]World Health Organization: Global action plan 2013–2020 for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases [Resolution WHA66.10]. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2013.
• [9]Bull F, Milton K, Kahlmeier S: Health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) policy audit tool. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2011.
• [10]Bull F, Milton K, Kahlmeier S: National policy on physical activity: the development of a policy audit tool (PAT). J Phys Act Heal 2014, 11(2):233-40.
• [11]Bull FC, Bellew B, Schöppe S, Bauman AE: Developments in national physical activity policy: an international review and recommendations towards better practice. J Sci Med Sport 2004, 7(1, Supplement 1):93-104.
• [12]World Health Organization: A guide for population-based approached to increasing levels of physical activity:What works. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2007.
• [13]Department of Health and Social Security: Prevention and Health - Everybody’s business. Department of Health and Social Security, London; 1976.
• [14]Department of the Environment: Sport and recreation. Department of the Environment, London; 1975.
• [15]Killoran A, Fentem P, Caspersen C: Moving on. International perspectives on promoting physical activity. Health Education Authority, London; 1994.
• [16]Department of Health: Strategy statement on physical activity. Department of Health, London; 1996.
• [17]Department of Health: At least five a week. Department of Health, London; 2004.
• [18]Pate R, Pratt M, Blair S, Haskell W, Macera C, Bouchard C, et al.: Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. J Am Med Assoc 1995, 273(5):402-7.
• [19]US Department of Health and Human Services: Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; 1996.
• [20]Bull F: The Expert Working Groups: Physical activity guidelines in the U.K.: Review and recommendations. Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK; 2010.
• [21]Department of Health: Start active, stay active. Department of Health, London; 2011.
• [22]British Heart Foundation National Centre for Physical Activity and Health. Physical activity guidelines - support and dissemination. [http://www.bhfactive.org.uk/guidelinessupport/index.html].
• [23]Knox E, Esliger D, Biddle S, Sherar L: Lack of knowledge of physical activity guidelines: can physical activity promotion campaigns do better? BMJ Open 2013, 3:e003633. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003633
• [24]Department for Culture Media and Sport Strategy Unit: Game plan: A strategy for delivering government’s sport and physical activity objectives. Department for Culture Media and Sport Strategy Unit, London; 2002.
• [25]Borodulin K, Laatikainen T, Juolevi A, Jousilahti P: Thirty-year trends of physical activity in relation to age, calendar time and birth cohort in Finnish adults. Eur J Public Health 2008, 18(3):339-44.
• [26]Craig C, Russell S, Cameron C, Bauman A: Twenty-year trends in physical activity among Canadian adults. Can J Public Health 2004, 95(1):59-63.
• [27]Department for Culture Media and Sport: Before, during and after: Making the most of the London 2012 Games. Department for Culture Media and Sport, London; 2008.
• [28]Sport England: Briefing Note: Explanation of the different sport participation indicators. Sport England, London; 2009.
• [29]Gibson O. Jeremy Hunt admits London 2012 legacy targets will be scrapped. [http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2011/mar/28/jeremy-hunt-london-2012-legacy].
• [30]Gibson O. Hugh Robertson admits to struggling with legacy for grassroots sport. [http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2012/mar/05/hugh-robertson-legacy-games-2012].
• [31]Sports Council, Health Education Authority: Allied Dunbar Fitness Survey. Sports Council, London; 1992.
• [32]Bauman A: Trends in exercise prevalence in Australia. Community Health Stud 1987, 11(3):190-6.
• [33]Bauman A, Phongsavan P, Schoepp S, Owen N: Physical activity measurement- a primer for health promotion. Promot Educ 2006, 13(2):92-103.
• [34]Stamatakis E, Ekelund U, Wareham N: Temporal trends in physical activity in England: the health survey for England 1991 to 2004. Prev Med 2007, 45(6):416-23.
• [35]NHS Information Centre: Health survey for England, 2008. NHS Information Centre, London; 2009.
• [36]Scott M. Sport England splashes out £11 m on three surveys. [http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/dec/18/sport-england-active-people-survey].
• [37]Sport England: The Active People Survey 7 - Questionnaire content. Sport England, London; 2014.
• [38]Cavill N, Bauman A: Changing the way people think about health-enhancing physical activity: do mass media campaigns have a role? J Sports Sci 2004, 22(8):771-90.
• [39]Bauman A, Chau J: The role of media in promoting physical activity. J Phys Act Heal 2009, 6(Supplement 2):S196-210.
• [40]Leavy J, Bull F, Rosenberg M, Bauman A: Physical activity mass media campaigns and their evaluation: a systematic review of the literature 2003–2010. Health Educ Res 2011, 26(6):1060-85.
• [41]Hillsdon M, Cavill N, Nanchahal K, Diamond A, White I: National level promotion of physical activity: results from England’s ACTIVE for LIFE campaign. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001, 55:755-61.
• [42]Cross Government Obesity Unit, Department of Health, Department for Children Schools and Families: Healthy weight, healthy lives: A cross-government strategy for England. Department of Health, London; 2008.
• [43]Department of Health: Change4Life one year on. Department of Health, London; 2010.
• [44]TNS/BMRB: Change4Life tracking study. TNS/BMRB, London; 2010.
• [45]Sweney M. Health secretary axes £75 m marketing budget for anti-obesity drive. [http://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/jul/07/andrew-lansley-change4life-obesity].
• [46]Public Health England: Marketing plan 2013–2014. Public Health England, London; 2013.
• [47]Department of Health. Our national partners. [http://www.nhs.uk/change4life/pages/national-partners-list.aspx]
• [48]Bull F, Milton K, Kahlmeier S, Arlotti A, Backovic-Jurican A, Belander O, et al. Turning the tide: national policy approaches to increasing physical activity in seven European countries. Br J Sports Med 2014; doi:10.1136/bjsports–2013–093200.
• [49]Bauman A, McLean G, Hurdle D, Walker S, Boyd J, van Aalst I, et al.: Evaluation of the national “Push Play” campaign in New Zealand – creating population awareness of physical activity. J New Zeal Med Assoc 2003, 116(1179):1-11.
• [50]World Health Organization: Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. World Health Organization, Geneva; 1997.
• [51]Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, Heath GW, Howze EH, Powell KE, et al.: The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002, 22(4 (Suppl):73-107.
• [52]O’Reilly N, Brunette M: Public-private partnerships in physical activity and sport. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Illinois; 2013.
• [53]Swiss Federal Office of Sport. The Swiss Federal Gvernment’s Concept for a National Sports Policy. Magglingen; 2000.
• [54]Federal Office of Public Health. How do we eat and exercise? Trends in nutrition and physical activity in Switzerland. Bern; 2010.
• [55]Bauman AE, King L, Nutbeam D: Rethinking the evaluation and measurement of health in all policies. Health Promot Int 2014, 29(S1):i143-51.
• [56]Vuori I, Lankenau B, Pratt M: Physical activity policy and program development: the experience in Finland. Public Health Rep 2004, 119:331-45.
• [57]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About the Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System. [http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/about/about_brfss.htm].