Improving community development by linking agriculture, nutrition and education: design of a randomised trial of “home-grown” school feeding in Mali

Trials

Aulo Gelli¹  Edoardo Masset¹ 

[1] Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RE, UK

关键词: Agriculture;    Nutrition;    Education;    Impact evaluation;    School feeding;   

Others  :  1094688
DOI  :  10.1186/1745-6215-14-55

 received in 2012-05-03, accepted in 2013-01-22,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Providing food through schools has well documented effects in terms of the education, health and nutrition of school children. However, there is limited evidence in terms of the benefits of providing a reliable market for small-holder farmers through “home-grown” school feeding approaches. This study aims to evaluate the impact of school feeding programmes sourced from small-holder farmers on small-holder food security, as well as on school children’s education, health and nutrition in Mali. In addition, this study will examine the links between social accountability and programme performance.

Design

This is a field experiment planned around the scale-up of the national school feeding programme, involving 116 primary schools in 58 communities in food insecure areas of Mali. The randomly assigned interventions are: 1) a school feeding programme group, including schools and villages where the standard government programme is implemented; 2) a “home-grown” school feeding and social accountability group, including schools and villages where the programme is implemented in addition to training of community based organisations and local government; and 3) the control group, including schools and household from villages where the intervention will be delayed by at least two years, preferably without informing schools and households. Primary outcomes include small-holder farmer income, school participation and learning, and community involvement in the programme. Other outcomes include nutritional status and diet-diversity. The evaluation will follow a mixed method approach, including household, school and village level surveys as well as focus group discussions with small-holder farmers, school children, parents and community members. The impact evaluation will be incorporated within the national monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system strengthening activities that are currently underway in Mali. Baselines surveys are planned for 2012. A monthly process monitoring visits, spot checks and quarterly reporting will be undertaken as part of the regular programme monitoring activities. Evaluation surveys are planned for 2014.

Discussion

National governments in sub-Saharan Africa have demonstrated strong leadership in the response to the recent food and financial crises by scaling-up school feeding programmes. “Home-grown” school feeding programmes have the potential to link the increased demand for school feeding goods and services to community-based stakeholders, including small-holder farmers and women’s groups. Alongside assessing the more traditional benefits to school children, this evaluation will be the first to examine the impact of linking school food service provision to small-holder farmer income, as well as the link between community level engagement and programme performance.

Trial registration

ISRCTN76705891

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Masset and Gelli; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Bundy DAP, Burbano C, Grosh M, Gelli A, Jukes M, Drake L: Rethinking School Feeding: Social Safety Nets, Child Development, and the Education Sector. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2009.
• [2]Sumberg J, Sabates-Wheeler R: Linking agricultural development to school feeding in Sub-Saharan Africa: theoretical perspectives. Food Policy 2011, 36:341-349.
• [3]New Partnership for Africa’s Development: The NEPAD Home-Grown School Feeding Programme: A Concept Note. Addis Ababa: NEPAD; 2003.
• [4]Gelli A, Neeser K, Drake L: Home Grown School Feeding: Linking Small Holder Agriculture to School Food Provision. London: Partnership for Child Development; 2010. [PCD Working Paper No. 212, Volume]
• [5]World Food Programme: Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Assessment. Bamako: World Food Programme; 2005.
• [6]USDA Foreign Agricultural Service: Assessment of Local Production for School Feeding in Mali. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture; 2009.
• [7]Partnership for Child Development: Anaemia in school children in eight countries in Africa and Asia. Public Health Nutr 2001, 4:749-756.
• [8]World Food Programme/Partnership for Child Development/World Bank: School feeding in Mali Situation Analysis. Bamako: World Food Programme; 2011.
• [9]Johnson C, Janoch E: Engaging Communities: Evaluating Social Accountability in School Feeding Programmes. London: Partnership for Child Development; 2011.
• [10]Ahmed AU, Sharma M: Home Grown School Feeding Project: Economic Modeling and Supply Response. Washington DC: IFPRI; 2007.
• [11]Baulch B, Hansen H, Trung LD, Minh Tam TN: The spatial integration of paddy markets in Vietnam. J Agric Econ 2008, 59:271-295.
• [12]Glewwe P: Schools and skills in developing countries: education policies and socioeconomic outcomes. J Econ Lit 2002, 40:436-482.
• [13]Jukes MCH, Drake LJ, Bundy DAP: School Health, Nutrition and Education for All: Levelling the Playing Field. Oxfordshire, UK: CAB International; 2008.
• [14]Galloway R, Kristjansson EA, Gelli A, Meir U, Espejo F, Bundy DA: School feeding, cost and outcomes. Food Nutr Bull 2009, 30:171-182.
• [15]Ahmed AU, Arends-Kuenning M: Do crowded classrooms crowd out learning? Evidence from the Food for Education programme in Bangladesh. In Food Consumption and Nutrition Division. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2003. [Discussion Paper 149, Volume]
• [16]Kristjansson E, Francis DK, Liberato S, Benkhalti Jandu M, Welch V, Batal M, Greenhalgh T, Rader T, Noonan E, Shea B, Janzen L, Wells GA, Petticrew M: Feeding interventions for improving the physical and psychosocial health of disadvantaged children aged three months to five years (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, (6):Art. No. CD009924.
• [17]Beaton GH, Ghassemi H: Supplementary feeding programs for young children in developing countries. Am J Clin Nutr 1982, 35:863-916.
• [18]Svedberg P: Poverty and Undernutrition: Theory, Measurement and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
• [19]Kazianga H, de Walque D, Alderman H: Educational and Health Impacts of Two School Feeding Schemes: Evidence from a Randomized Trial in Rural Burkina Faso. 2009. [World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4976, Volume]
• [20]Adelman S, Alderman H, Gilligan DO, Lehrer K: The Impact of Alternative Food for Education Programs on Learning Achievement and Cognitive Development in Northern Uganda. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2008.
• [21]FAO/WHO: Energy and Protein Requirements. Geneva: WHO; 1985. [Technical Report Series 724, Volume]
• [22]Grantham-McGregor SG, Ani G: Iron-deficiency anemia: reexamining the nature and magnitude of the public health problem. J Nutr 2001, 131:649S-668S.
• [23]Pollitt E: Iron deficiency and cognitive function. Annu Rev Nutr 1993, 13:521-537.
• [24]Polliltt E, Gersowitz M, Gargiulo M: Educational benefits of the United States school feeding program: a critical review of the literature. Am J Public Health 1978, 68:477-481.
• [25]Hayes R, Moulton LH: Cluster Randomised Trials. Oxford, UK: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 2009.
• [26]Bruhn M, McKenzie D: In Pursuit of Balance: Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2009. [World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4572, Volume]
• [27]Beaman L, Dillon A: Do household definitions matter in survey design? results from a randomizes survey experiment in Mali. J Dev Econ 2012, 98:124-135.
• [28]Angrist JD, Pischke JS: Mostly Harmless Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2009.
• [29]Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S: How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ 2004, 119:249-275.
• [30]Kristjansson EA, Robinson V, Petticrew M, MacDonald B, Krasevec J, Janzen L, Greenhalgh T, Wells G, MacGowan J, Farmer A, Shea BJ, Mayhew A, Tugwell P: School feeding for improving the physical and psychosocial health of disadvantaged elementary school children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, CD004676.
• [31]Gelli A, Meir U, Espejo F: Does provision of food in school increase girls’ enrollment? Evidence from schools in Sub-Saharan Africa. Food Nutr Bull 2007, 28:149-155.
• [32]Drèze J, Kingdon G: School participation in rural India. Rev Dev Econ 2001, 5:1-24.
• [33]Brooker S, Kabatereine NB, Fleming F, Devlin N: Cost and cost-effectiveness of nationwide school-based helminth control in Uganda: intra-country variation and effects of scaling-up. Health Policy Plan 2008, 23:24-35.
• [34]Ahmed AU: Impact of Feeding Children in School: Evidence from Bangladesh. Washington, DC: IFPRI; 2004.
• [35]Jacoby HG: Is there an intrahousehold 'flypaper' effect? Evidence from a school feeding programme. Econ J 2001, 112:196-221.
• [36]Buttenheim A, Alderman H, Friedman J: Impact Evaluation of School Feeding Programs in Lao PDR. 2010. [World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5518, Volume]