Geographic trends in research output and citations in veterinary medicine: insight into global research capacity, species specialization, and interdisciplinary relationships

BMC Veterinary Research

Ana Marusic¹  Mary M Christopher² 

[1] Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2, 21000, Split, Croatia;School of Veterinary Medicine, 4206 VM3A, University of California–Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA

关键词: Research publication;    Medicine;    Journal;    Education;    Economics;    Bibliometrics;    Agriculture;   

Others  :  1119523
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-6148-9-115

 received in 2013-02-21, accepted in 2013-06-04,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Bibliographic data can be used to map the research quality and productivity of a discipline. We hypothesized that bibliographic data would identify geographic differences in research capacity, species specialization, and interdisciplinary relationships within the veterinary profession that corresponded with demographic and economic indices.

Results

Using the SCImago portal, we retrieved veterinary journal, article, and citation data in the Scopus database by year (1996–2011), region, country, and publication in species-specific journals (food animal, small animal, equine, miscellaneous), as designated by Scopus. In 2011, Scopus indexed 165 journals in the veterinary subject area, an increase from 111 in 1996. As a percentage of veterinary research output between 1996 and 2010, Western Europe and North America (US and Canada) together accounted for 60.9% of articles and 73.0% of citations. The number of veterinary articles increased from 8815 in 1996 to 19,077 in 2010 (net increase 66.6%). During this time, publications increased by 21.0% in Asia, 17.2% in Western Europe, and 17.0% in Latin America, led by Brazil, China, India, and Turkey. The United States had the highest number of articles in species-specific journals. As a percentage of regional output, the proportion of articles in small animal and equine journals was highest in North America and the proportion of articles in food animal journals was highest in Africa. Based on principal component analysis, total articles were highly correlated with gross domestic product (based on World Bank data). The proportion of articles in small animal and equine journals was associated with gross national income, research and development, and % urban population, as opposed to the proportion of food animal articles, agricultural output, and % rural population. Co-citations linked veterinary medicine with medicine in the United States, with basic sciences in Eastern Europe and the Far East, and with agriculture in most other regions and countries.

Conclusions

Bibliographic data reflect the demographic changes affecting veterinary medicine worldwide and provide insight into current and changing global research capacity, specialization, and interdisciplinary affiliations. A more detailed analysis of species-specific trends is warranted and could contribute to a better understanding of educational and workforce needs in veterinary medicine.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Christopher and Marusic; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Willis NG, Monroe FA, Potworowski JA, Halbert G, Evans BR, Smith JE, Andrews KJ, Spring L, Bradbrook A: Envisioning the future of veterinary medical education: the association of American veterinary medical colleges foresight project, final report. J Vet Med Educ 2007, 34:1-41.
• [2]National Academy of Sciences: Workforce needs in veterinary medicine. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2012.
• [3]US National Research Council: Animal Health at the Crossroads: Preventing, Detecting, and Diagnosing Animal Diseases. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2005.
• [4]Marshak R: Veterinary schools and the profession: a search for bearings in the new century. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005, 227:1234-1238.
• [5]Larson RI: Food animal veterinary medicine: leading a changing profession. J Vet Med Educ 2004, 31:341-345.
• [6]USDA Economic Research Service: Farm employment losses outstrip job gains in farm-related industries in some nonmetro areas. Rural Conditions and Trends 2000, 10:22-26.
• [7]Narver HL: Demographics, moral orientation, and veterinary shortages in food animal and laboratory animal medicine. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007, 230:1798-1804.
• [8]Rucker M: Gender changes and the future of our profession. J Vet Med Educ 2002, 29:63-65.
• [9]Prasse KW, Heider LE, Maccabe AT: Envisioning the future of veterinary medicine and the imperative for change in veterinary medical education. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007, 231:1340-1342.
• [10]Lumeij JT, Herrtage ME: Veterinary specialization in Europe. J Vet Med Educ 2006, 33:176-179.
• [11]Chieffo C, Kelly AM, Ferguson J: Trends in gender, employment, salary, and debt of graduates of US veterinary medical schools and colleges. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008, 233:910-917.
• [12]American Veterinary Medicine Association Communications Division: Employment, starting salaries, and educational indebtedness of year-2011 graduates of US veterinary medical colleges. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2011, 239:953-957.
• [13]Market research statistics: U.S. Veterinarians. American Veterinary Medical Association. 2011. http://www.avma.org/KB/Resources/Statistics/Pages/Market-research-statistics-US-veterinarians-2011.aspx webcite
• [14]Soteriades ES, Rosmarakis ES, Paraschakis K, Falagas ME: Research contribution of different world regions in the top 50 biomedical journals (1995–2002). FASEB J 2005, 20:29-34.
• [15]Bliziotis IA, Paraschakis K, Vergidis PI, Karavasiou AI, Falagas ME: Worldwide trends in quantity and quality of published articles in the field of infectious diseases. BMC Inf Dis 2005, 5:16-23. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]deMoya-Anegón F, Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, Vargas-Quesada B, Corera-Alvarez E, Muñoz FJ, González-Molina A, Herrero-Solana V: Coverage analysis of Scopus: a journal metric approach. Scientometrics 2007, 73:53-78.
• [17]Grindley DJC, Brennan ML, Dean RS: Searching the veterinary literature: a comparison of the coverage of veterinary journals by nine bilbiographic databases. J Vet Med Educ 2012, 39:404-412.
• [18]SCImago. http://www.scimagojr.com webcite
• [19]Hailat N: Present status and vision for veterinary higher education in the Arab world. J Vet Med Educ 2005, 32:151-155.
• [20]González-Pereira B, Guerrero-Bote VP, Moya-Anegón F: A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: the SJR indicator. J Informetrics 2010, 4:379-391.
• [21]Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G: Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 2008, 22:338-342.
• [22]ISI Journal Citation Reports. New York: Thomson-Reuters; 2011. [JCR Science Edition Veterinary Sciences]
• [23]DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals. http://www.doaj.org webcite
• [24]World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org webcite
• [25]American Veterinary Medical Association. http://www.avma.org/professionaldevelopment/education/foreign/pages/ECFVG-world-colleges-colleges.aspx webcite
• [26]World Veterinary Association. http://www.worldvet.org webcite
• [27]Leydesdorff L, de Moya-Anegón F, Guerrero-Bote VP: Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: a comparison with the journal citation reports of the ISI. J Am Soc Infor Sci Technol 2010, 61:352-369.
• [28]Elsinghorst TA: Analysis of the 96 most often cited articles published in veterinary journals in 2002 and 2003. Vet Q 2005, 27:183-189.
• [29]Falagas ME, Papastamatiaki PA, Bliziotis IA: A bibliometric analysis of research productivity in parasitology by different world regions during a 9-year period (1995–2003). BMC Inf Dis 2006, 6:56-61. BioMed Central Full Text
• [30]Rahman M, Fukui T: A decline in the U.S. share of research articles. N Engl J Med 2002, 347:1211-1212.
• [31]Hefler L, Tempfer C, Kainz C: Geography of biomedical publications in the European union, 1990–98. Lancet 1856, 1999:353.
• [32]Weale AR, Bailey M, Lear PA: The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: a comparison to the impact factor. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004, 4:14-21. BioMed Central Full Text
• [33]Falagas ME, Kouranos VD, Arencibia-Jorge R, Karageorgopoulos DE: Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. FASEB J 2008, 22:2623-2628.
• [34]Bollen J, Van de Sompel H, Hagberg A, Chute R: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS One 2009, 4:e6022.