Turning dread into capital: South Africa’s AIDS diplomacy

Globalization and Health

Pieter Fourie¹ 

[1] Department of Political Science, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, 7602, Matieland, South Africa

关键词: Middle power;    Foreign policy;    Niche diplomacy;    South Africa;    AIDS;    HIV;   

Others  :  819361
DOI  :  10.1186/1744-8603-9-8

 received in 2012-09-29, accepted in 2013-02-27,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

In much of the world, President George W. Bush was not admired for his foreign policy and diplomacy. It is therefore ironic that Bush’s single most uncontested foreign policy triumph was an instance of what has now become known as “health diplomacy”. In 2003 Bush launched the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, a five-year $15 billion initiative to fight HIV/AIDS, mostly in Africa. The president’s pragmatic health diplomacy may well save his foreign policy legacy. This article argues that a middle power such as South Africa should consider a similar instrumental AIDS diplomatic strategy, to rehabilitate its public health as well as foreign policy images.

Discussion

This article reflects on the emergence and contemporary practice of health diplomacy. In particular, it explores the potential of niche areas within health diplomacy to become constructive focal points of emerging middle powers’ foreign policies. Middle powers often apply niche diplomacy to maximise their foreign policy impact, particularly by pursuing a multilateral agenda. The literature on middle powers indicates that such foreign policy ambitions and concomitant diplomacy mostly act to affirm the global status quo. Instead, this paper argues that there may well be niches within health diplomacy in particular that can be used to actually challenge the existing global order. Emerging middle powers in particular can use niche areas within health diplomacy in a critical theoretical manner, so that foreign policy and diplomacy become a project of emancipation and transformation, rather than an affirmation of the world as it is.

Summary

The article first describes the emergence and contemporary practice of health diplomacy; this is followed by a discussion of niche diplomacy, in particular as it applies to the foreign policy agendas of emerging middle powers. It then reviews South African foreign policy and diplomacy, before situating these policies within the context of emerging mechanisms of south-south multilateralism. The article concludes by synthesizing these elements and advocating for a South African AIDS diplomacy, emphasizing its potential to galvanize a global project of emancipation.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Fourie; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Thörn H: AID(S) politics and power: a critique of global governance. In Power and Transitional Activism. Edited by Olesen T. New York: Routledge; 2011:237.
• [2]President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief: Celebrating Life: The U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief: 2009 Annual Report to Congress. Washington D.C: ; 2009. 2006-2009.pepfar.gov/press/fifth_annual_report/index.htm
• [3]Gerson M: The despots’ democracy. In Washington Post. Washington D.C.: The Washington Post Company; 2008.
• [4]Støre JG, Amorim C, Douste-Blazy P, Wirayuda H, Gadio CT, Dlamini-Zuma N, Pibulsonggram N: Oslo Ministerial Declaration global health: a pressing foreign policy issue of our time. Lancet 2007, 369:1-6.
• [5]Chan M, Støre JG, Kouchner B: Foreign policy and global public health: working together towards common goals. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2008, 86:497-576.
• [6]Aldis W: Health security as a public health concept: a critical analysis. Health Policy and Planning 2008, 23:369-375.
• [7]Fendrick RJ: Diplomacy as an instrument of national power. In U.S. Army War College Guide to National Security, Policy and Strategy. Edited by Bartholomees JB. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute; 2004:179-184.
• [8]Feldbaum H, Michaud J: Health diplomacy and the enduring relevance of foreign policy interests. PLoS Medicine 2010, 7(4):e1000226.
• [9]Katz R, Kornblet S, Arnold G, Lief E, Fisher JE: Defining health diplomacy: changing demands in the era of globalization. Milbank Quarterly 2011, 89:505.
• [10]Fourie P, Perche D, Schoeman R: Donor assistance for AIDS in South Africa: many actors, multiple agendas. Strategic Review for Southern Africa 2010, 32:93-120.
• [11]Garrett L: The Future of Foreign Assistance Amid Global Economic and Financial Crisis: Advancing Global Health in the U.S. Development Agenda. New York: Council on Foreign Relations; 2009.
• [12]Government Communication and Information Service: South Africa’s Aids funding safe for now. South African Government News Agency 2012. http://oldsanews.gcis.gov.za/rss/12/12091815051002 webcite
• [13]Behringer RM: Middle power leadership on human security. Gainesville, Florida: Paper presented at annual meeting of the International Studies Association; 2003:2.
• [14]Leavitt MO: Health diplomacy: from the American people. Washington D.C: Speech given in The Prologue Series, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008:2.
• [15]Leavitt MO: Health diplomacy: from the American people. Washington D.C: Speech given in The Prologue Series, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008:8.
• [16]Katz R, Kornblet S, Arnold G, Lief E, Fisher JE: Defining health diplomacy: changing demands in the era of globalization. Milbank Quarterly 2011, 89:505.
• [17]Nunn A, Da Fonsecab E, Gruskind S: Changing global essential medicines norms to improve access to AIDS treatment: lessons from Brazil. Global Public Health 2009, 4:131-149.
• [18]Lee K, Chagas LC, Novotny TE: Brazil and the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: global health diplomacy as soft power. PLoS Medicine 2010, 7:1-5.
• [19]Bliss K: Health Diplomacy of Foreign Governments. Washington D.C: Center for Strategic and International Studies; 2011.
• [20]Rudderham MA: Middle power pull: can middle powers use public diplomacy to ameliorate the image of the west? YCISS Working Paper 2008, 46:3.
• [21]Rudderham MA: Middle power pull: can middle powers use public diplomacy to ameliorate the image of the west? YCISS Working Paper 2008, 46:7.
• [22]Jordaan E: The concept of a middle power in international relations: distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon 2003, 30:165-181.
• [23]Carlsnaes W: Nel P (editors): In Full Flight: South African Foreign Policy After Apartheid. Midrand: Institute for Global Dialogue; 2006.
• [24]Landsberg C: Transformation, continuity and diffusion: South Africa’s foreign policy under Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma. Inroads The Canadian Journal of Opinion 2011, 29. http://www.inroadsjournal.ca webcite
• [25]Borer TA, Mills K: Explaining postapartheid South African human rights foreign policy: unsettled identity and unclear interests. Journal of Human Rights 2011, 10:76-98.
• [26]Titus D: Human rights in foreign policy and practice: the South African case considered. South African Institute of International Affairs Occasional Paper 2009., 52http://www.saiia.org.za/images/stories/pubs/occasional_papers/saia_sop_52_titus_20091130_en.pdf webcite
• [27]Department of International Relations and Cooperation: Building a Better World: The Diplomacy of Ubuntu. White Paper on South Africa’s Foreign Policy. Pretoria; 2011. http://www.info.gov.za/view/DownloadFileAction?id=149749 webcite
• [28]Titus D: Human rights in foreign policy and practice: the South African case considered. South African Institute of International Affairs Occasional Paper 2009, 52:16.
• [29]Landsberg C, Monyae D: South Africa’s foreign policy: carving a global niche. South African Journal of International Affairs 2006, 13:131.
• [30]Kemp Spies Y: South Africa’s multilateral challenges in a “polypolar” world. The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs 2010, 45:87.
• [31]Chand S, Morrison JS, Piot P, Heymann DL: From G8 to G20, is health next in line? Lancet 2010. http://download.thelancet.com/flatcontentassets/pdfs/S014067361060997X.pdf webcite
• [32]Heine J: Will they have table manners? The G20, emerging powers and global responsibility. South African Journal of International Affairs 2010, 17:10.
• [33]Flemes D: India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) in the new global order: interests, strategies and values of the emerging coalition. Int Stud 2009, 46:407.
• [34]Alden C, Vieira MA: The new diplomacy of the south: South Africa, Brazil. India and trilateralism. Third World Quarterly 2005, 26:1090.
• [35]Ruger JP, Ng NY: Emerging and transitioning countries’ role in global health. Saint Louis University Journal of Health Law & Policy 2010, 3:253-290.
• [36]O’Manique C: Palliative interventions: Canadian foreign policy, security and global health governance. In Health for Some: the Political Economy of Global Health Governance. Edited by MacLean SJ, Brown SA, Fourie P. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009:53.
• [37]Hobden S, Jones RW: Marxist theories of International Relations. In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 4th edition. Edited by Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. chapter 8
• [38]Cox RW: Social forces, states and world orders: beyond International Relations theory. In Neorealism and Its Critics. Edited by Keohane RO. New York: Columbia University Press; 1986. chapter 8
• [39]Wouters E, Van Rensburg D, Meulemans H: The National Strategic Plan of South Africa: what are the prospects of success after the repeated failure of previous AIDS policy? Health Policy Planning 2010, 25:171-85.
• [40]Chigwedere P, Seage GR, Gruskin S, Lee T-H, Essex M: Estimating the lost benefits of antiretroviral drug use in South Africa. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome 2008, 49:410-415.
• [41]Fourie P, Meyer M: The Politics of AIDS Denialism: South Africa’s Failure to Respond. Farnham: Ashgate; 2010:142.
• [42]Drager N, Fidler DP: Foreign policy, trade and health: at the cutting edge of global health diplomacy. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2007, 85:162.
• [43]Nauta W: Mobilising Brazil as significant other in the fight for HIV/AIDS treatment in South Africa: the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) and its global allies. In Research paper of the Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences. : Maastricht University; 2011. http://www.nai.uu.se/ecas-4/panels/1-20/panel-2/Nauta-Wiebe-Full-Paper.pdf webcite
• [44]Flynn M: Pharmaceutical diplomacy in the Americas and beyond—social democratic principles versus soft power interests. Toronto, Canada: Paper presented at the 2010 Congress of the Latin American Studies Association; 2010:11. October 6–9
• [45]Placidi D: AIDS and international relations: a case study of French HIV/AIDS diplomacy. Montreal, Quebec: Paper presented at the 45th Annual International Studies Association Convention; 2004. March 18
• [46]Sidibé M, Tanaka S, Buse K: People, passion & politics: looking back and moving forward in the governance of the AIDS response. Global Health Governance 2010, 4:14.
• [47]Naicker S, Plange-Rhule J, Tutt RC, Eastwood JB: Shortage of healthcare workers in developing countries—Africa. Ethnicity & Disease 2009, 19:60.
• [48]Samb B, Celletti F, Holloway J, Van Damme W, De Cock KM, Dybul M: Rapid expansion of the health workforce in response to the HIV epidemic. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:2510-4.
• [49]Novotny TE, Adams V: Global health diplomacy: a call for a new field of teaching and research. San Francisco Medicine 2007, 80:22-23.