期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Environmental Health Science Engineering
Performance assessment of aquatic macrophytes for treatment of municipal wastewater
Abdul Razzaq Ghumman1  Arshad Ali2  Hashim Nisar Hashmi1  Mumtaz Shah3 
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, UET, Taxila, Pakistan;Civil Engineering Department, MCE, Rasalpur, Pakistan;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UET, Taxila, Pakistan
关键词: Waste stabilization ponds;    Plant growth;    NEQS;    Phytoplankton;    Duckweed;    BOD5;    Aquatic macrophytes;   
Others  :  1164596
DOI  :  10.1186/2052-336X-12-106
 received in 2013-07-21, accepted in 2014-07-09,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The objective of the study was to evaluate the performance of three different aquatic macrophytes for treatment of municipal wastewater collected from Taxila (Pakistan). A physical model of treatment plant was constructed and was operated for six experimental runs with each species of macrophyte. Every experimental run consist of thirty days period. Regular monitoring of influent and effluent concentrations were made during each experimental run. For the treatment locally available macrophyte species i.e. water hyacinth, duckweed & water lettuce were selected to use. To evaluate the treatment performance of each macrophyte, BOD5, COD, and Nutrients (Nitrogen and Phosphorus) were monitored in effluent from model at different detention time of every experimental run after ensuring steady state conditions. The average reduction of effluent value of each parameter using water hyacinth were 50.61% for BOD5, 46.38% for COD, 40.34% for Nitrogen and 18.76% for Phosphorus. For duckweed the average removal efficiency for selected parameters were 33.43% for BOD5, 26.37% for COD, 17.59% for Nitrogen and 15.25% for Phosphorus and for Water Lettuce the average removal efficiency were 33.43% for BOD5, 26.37% for COD, 17.59% for Nitrogen and 15.25% for Phosphorus. The mechanisms of pollutant removal in this system include both aerobic and anaerobic microbiological conversions, sorption, sedimentation, volatilization and chemical transformations. The rapid growth of the biomass was measured within first ten days detention time. It was also observed that performance of macrophytes is influenced by variation of pH and Temperature. A pH of 6-9 and Temperature of 15-38°C is most favorable for treatment of wastewater by macrophytes. The option of macrophytes for treatment of Municipal sewage under local environmental conditions can be explored by further verifying the removal efficiency under variation of different environmental conditions. Also this is need of time that macrophyte system should be used for treatment of wastewater because their performance is comparable to conventional wastewater treatment plants and also the system has very low O&M costs.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Shah et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150415093451371.pdf 1979KB PDF download
Figure 19. 35KB Image download
Figure 18. 36KB Image download
Figure 17. 36KB Image download
Figure 16. 49KB Image download
Figure 15. 49KB Image download
Figure 14. 45KB Image download
Figure 13. 44KB Image download
Figure 12. 44KB Image download
Figure 11. 45KB Image download
Figure 10. 47KB Image download
Figure 9. 46KB Image download
Figure 8. 49KB Image download
Figure 7. 50KB Image download
Figure 6. 52KB Image download
Figure 5. 44KB Image download
Figure 4. 48KB Image download
Figure 3. 48KB Image download
Figure 2. 49KB Image download
Figure 1. 22KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Figure 13.

Figure 14.

Figure 15.

Figure 16.

Figure 17.

Figure 18.

Figure 19.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]IWMI: A Framework for Global Assessment of the Extent of Wastewater Irrigation. The Need for a Common Wastewater Typology. Netherlands: International Water Management Institute; 2004:958.
  • [2]Trepanier C, Parent S, Comeau Y, Bouvrette J: Phosphorous budget as a water quality management tool for closed aquatic mesocosms. J Water Res 2002, 36:1007-1017.
  • [3]Montaigne F, Essick P: Water pressure. Natl Geog 2002, 202:2-23.
  • [4]Duenas JF, Alonso JR, Rey AF, Ferrer AS: Characterization of phosphorous forms in wastewater treatment plants. J Hazard Mater 2003, 97:1-3.
  • [5]Bitton G: Wastewater Microbiology. 3rd edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2005:7-746.
  • [6]Metacalf and Eddy: Wastewater Engineering. New York: McGraw- Hill Inc; 1991.
  • [7]Reed SC, Middlebrooks EJ, Crites RW: Natural Systems for Waste Management and Treatment. 2nd edition. New York: McGraw- Hill; 1988:3-307.
  • [8]Zhang XB, Liu P, Yang YS, Chen WR: Phytoremediation of urban wastewater by model wetlands with ornamental hydrophytes. J Environ Sci 2007, 19:902-909.
  • [9]Mayo AW, Kalibbala M: Modelling faecal coliform mortality in water hyacinths ponds. Phys Chem Earth 2007, 32:1212-1220.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:153次 浏览次数:13次