Journal of Environmental Health Science Engineering | |
Performance assessment of aquatic macrophytes for treatment of municipal wastewater | |
Abdul Razzaq Ghumman1  Arshad Ali2  Hashim Nisar Hashmi1  Mumtaz Shah3  | |
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, UET, Taxila, Pakistan;Civil Engineering Department, MCE, Rasalpur, Pakistan;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UET, Taxila, Pakistan | |
关键词: Waste stabilization ponds; Plant growth; NEQS; Phytoplankton; Duckweed; BOD5; Aquatic macrophytes; | |
Others : 1164596 DOI : 10.1186/2052-336X-12-106 |
|
received in 2013-07-21, accepted in 2014-07-09, 发布年份 2014 | |
![]() |
【 摘 要 】
The objective of the study was to evaluate the performance of three different aquatic macrophytes for treatment of municipal wastewater collected from Taxila (Pakistan). A physical model of treatment plant was constructed and was operated for six experimental runs with each species of macrophyte. Every experimental run consist of thirty days period. Regular monitoring of influent and effluent concentrations were made during each experimental run. For the treatment locally available macrophyte species i.e. water hyacinth, duckweed & water lettuce were selected to use. To evaluate the treatment performance of each macrophyte, BOD5, COD, and Nutrients (Nitrogen and Phosphorus) were monitored in effluent from model at different detention time of every experimental run after ensuring steady state conditions. The average reduction of effluent value of each parameter using water hyacinth were 50.61% for BOD5, 46.38% for COD, 40.34% for Nitrogen and 18.76% for Phosphorus. For duckweed the average removal efficiency for selected parameters were 33.43% for BOD5, 26.37% for COD, 17.59% for Nitrogen and 15.25% for Phosphorus and for Water Lettuce the average removal efficiency were 33.43% for BOD5, 26.37% for COD, 17.59% for Nitrogen and 15.25% for Phosphorus. The mechanisms of pollutant removal in this system include both aerobic and anaerobic microbiological conversions, sorption, sedimentation, volatilization and chemical transformations. The rapid growth of the biomass was measured within first ten days detention time. It was also observed that performance of macrophytes is influenced by variation of pH and Temperature. A pH of 6-9 and Temperature of 15-38°C is most favorable for treatment of wastewater by macrophytes. The option of macrophytes for treatment of Municipal sewage under local environmental conditions can be explored by further verifying the removal efficiency under variation of different environmental conditions. Also this is need of time that macrophyte system should be used for treatment of wastewater because their performance is comparable to conventional wastewater treatment plants and also the system has very low O&M costs.
【 授权许可】
2014 Shah et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20150415093451371.pdf | 1979KB | ![]() |
|
Figure 19. | 35KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 18. | 36KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 17. | 36KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 16. | 49KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 15. | 49KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 14. | 45KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 13. | 44KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 12. | 44KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 11. | 45KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 10. | 47KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 9. | 46KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 8. | 49KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 7. | 50KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 6. | 52KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 5. | 44KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 4. | 48KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 3. | 48KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 2. | 49KB | Image | ![]() |
Figure 1. | 22KB | Image | ![]() |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.
Figure 11.
Figure 12.
Figure 13.
Figure 14.
Figure 15.
Figure 16.
Figure 17.
Figure 18.
Figure 19.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]IWMI: A Framework for Global Assessment of the Extent of Wastewater Irrigation. The Need for a Common Wastewater Typology. Netherlands: International Water Management Institute; 2004:958.
- [2]Trepanier C, Parent S, Comeau Y, Bouvrette J: Phosphorous budget as a water quality management tool for closed aquatic mesocosms. J Water Res 2002, 36:1007-1017.
- [3]Montaigne F, Essick P: Water pressure. Natl Geog 2002, 202:2-23.
- [4]Duenas JF, Alonso JR, Rey AF, Ferrer AS: Characterization of phosphorous forms in wastewater treatment plants. J Hazard Mater 2003, 97:1-3.
- [5]Bitton G: Wastewater Microbiology. 3rd edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2005:7-746.
- [6]Metacalf and Eddy: Wastewater Engineering. New York: McGraw- Hill Inc; 1991.
- [7]Reed SC, Middlebrooks EJ, Crites RW: Natural Systems for Waste Management and Treatment. 2nd edition. New York: McGraw- Hill; 1988:3-307.
- [8]Zhang XB, Liu P, Yang YS, Chen WR: Phytoremediation of urban wastewater by model wetlands with ornamental hydrophytes. J Environ Sci 2007, 19:902-909.
- [9]Mayo AW, Kalibbala M: Modelling faecal coliform mortality in water hyacinths ponds. Phys Chem Earth 2007, 32:1212-1220.