期刊论文详细信息
Implementation Science
Implementing the NICE osteoarthritis guidelines: a mixed methods study and cluster randomised trial of a model osteoarthritis consultation in primary care - the Management of OsteoArthritis In Consultations (MOSAICS) study protocol
Elaine M Hay5  Peter R Croft5  Rhian W Hughes5  Tracy Whitehurst5  Elizabeth Mason5  Kris Clarkson5  June Handy5  Angela Pushpa-Rajah2  Ebenezer Afolabi5  Raymond Oppong3  Sue Jowett3  Andrew Finney5  Sarah Ryan1  Gretl A McHugh4  Andrew Morden5  Clare Jinks5  John J Edwards5  Martyn Lewis5  Kelvin P Jordan5  Chris J Main5  Bie Nio Ong5  Mark Porcheret5  Emma L Healey5  Krysia S Dziedzic5 
[1] The Haywood Hospital, Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, High Lane, Burslem, Stoke-On-Trent ST6 7AG, Staffordshire, UK;Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Nottingham Health Science Partners, C Floor, South Block, Queen¿s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK;School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK;The School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK;Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffordshire, UK
关键词: Self-management;    NICE guidelines;    Primary care;    Implementation;    General practice;    Osteoarthritis;   
Others  :  1146609
DOI  :  10.1186/s13012-014-0095-y
 received in 2014-04-17, accepted in 2014-07-08,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

There is as yet no evidence on the feasibility of implementing recommendations from the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) osteoarthritis (OA) guidelines in primary care, or of the effect these recommendations have on the condition. The primary aim of this study is to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of a model OA consultation (MOAC), implementing the core recommendations from the NICE OA guidelines in primary care. Secondary aims are to investigate the impact, feasibility and acceptability of the MOAC intervention; to develop and evaluate a training package for management of OA by general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses; test the feasibility of deriving `quality markers¿ of OA management using a new consultation template and medical record review; and describe the uptake of core NICE OA recommendations in participants aged 45 years and over with joint pain.

Design

A mixed methods study with a nested cluster randomised controlled trial.

Method

This study was developed according to a defined theoretical framework (the Whole System Informing Self-management Engagement). An overarching model (the Normalisation Process Theory) will be employed to undertake a comprehensive `whole-system¿ evaluation of the processes and outcomes of implementing the MOAC intervention. The primary outcome is general physical health (Short Form-12 Physical component score [PCS]) (Ware 1996). The impact, acceptability and feasibility of the MOAC intervention at practice level will be assessed by comparing intervention and control practices using a Quality Indicators template and medical record review. Impact and acceptability of the intervention for patients will be assessed via self-completed outcome measures and semi-structured interviews. The impact, acceptability and feasibility of the MOAC intervention and training for GPs and practice nurses will be evaluated using a variety of methods including questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and observations.

Discussion

The main output from the study will be to determine whether the MOAC intervention is clinically and cost effective. Additional outputs will be the development of the MOAC for patients consulting with joint pain in primary care, training and educational materials, and resources for patients and professionals regarding supported self-management and uptake of NICE guidance.

Trial registration

ISRCTN number: ISRCTN06984617 webcite.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Dziedzic et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150403140912227.pdf 860KB PDF download
Figure 2. 63KB Image download
Figure 1. 40KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Jinks C, Ong BN, Richardson J: A mixed methods study to investigate needs assessment for knee pain and disability: population and individual perspectives. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007, 8:59. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [2]Hill S, Dziedzic K, Thomas E, Baker SR, Croft P: The illness perceptions associated with health and behavioural outcomes in people with musculoskeletal hand problems: findings from the North Staffordshire OA Project (NorStOP). Rheumatology 2007, 46:944-951.
  • [3]Altman RD, Hochberg MC, Moskowitz RW, Schnitzer TJ: Recommendations for the medical management of OA of the hip and knee: 2000 update. Arthritis Rheum 2000, 43:1905-1915.
  • [4]Jordan KM, Arden NK, Doherty M, Bannwarth B, Bijlsma JWJ, Dieppe P, Gunther K, Hauselmann H, Herrero-Beaumont G, Kaklamanis P, Lohmander S, Leeb B, Lequesne M, Mazieres B, Martin-Mola E, Pavelka K, Pendleton A, Punzi L, Serni U, Swoboda B, Verbruggen G, Zimmerman-Gorska I, Dougados M: EULAR Recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee OA: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2003, 62:1145-1155.
  • [5]Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados MD, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P: OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee OA, Part I: Critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence. OA Cartilage 2007, 15:981-1000.
  • [6]Zhang W, Doherty M, Leeb BF, Arden N, Bijlsma J, Dincer F, Dziedzic K, Häuselmann HJ, Herrero-Beaumont G, Kaklamanis P, Lohmander S, Maheu E, Martín-Mola E, Pavelka K, Punzi L, Reiter S, Sautner J, Smolen J, Verbruggen G, Zimmermann-Górska I: EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hand OA - report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2007, 66:377-388.
  • [7]Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P: OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee OA, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. OA Cartilage 2008, 16:137-162.
  • [8]Zhang W, Doherty M, Leeb BF, Alekseeva L, Arden N, Bijlsma J, Dincer F, Dziedzic K, Hauselmann HJ, Kaklamanis P, Kloppenburg M, Lohmander LS, Maheu E, Martin-Mola E, Pavelka K, Punzi L, Reiter S, Smolen J, Verbruggen G, Watt I, Zimmermann-Gorska I: EULAR evidence based recommendations for the diagnosis of hand OA - report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2009, 68:8-17.
  • [9]Zhang W, Doherty M, Peat G, Bierma-Zeinstra MA, Arden NK, Bresnihan B, Herrero-Beaumont G, Kirschner S, Leeb BF, Lohmander LS, Mazières B, Pavelka K, Punzi L, So AK, Tuncer T, Watt I, Bijlsma JW: EULAR evidence based recommendations for the diagnosis of knee OA. Ann Rheum Dis 2010, 69:483-489.
  • [10]Conaghan PG, Dickson J, Grant RL: Care and management of OA in adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2008, 336:502-503.
  • [11]Porcheret M, Jordan K, Jinks C: Primary care treatment of knee pain a survey in older adults. Rheumatol 2007, 46:1694-1700.
  • [12]Steel N, Bachmann M, Maisey S, Shekelle P, Breeze E, Marmot M, Melzer D: Self reported receipt of care consistent with 32 Quality Indicators: national population survey of adults aged 50 or more in England. BMJ 2008, 337:a957.
  • [13][http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG59] webcite NICE: OA: The care and management of adults with OA. In National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. 2008. .
  • [14]Finney A, Porcheret M, Grime J, Jordan KP, Handy J, Healey EL, Ryan S, Jester R, Dziedzic KS: Defining the content of an opportunistic osteoarthritis consultation with primary health care professionals: A dephi consensus study. Arthritis Care Res 2013, 65:962-8.
  • [15]Porcheret M, Grime J, Main C, Dziedzic K: Developing a model osteoarthritis consultation: a Delphi consensus exercise. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013, 14:25. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [16]The NHS improvement plan: putting people at the heart of public services. Department of Health, London; 2004.
  • [17]Mann C, Gooberman-Hill R: Health Care Provision for Osteoarthritis: Concordance Between What Patients Would Like and What Health Professionals Think They Should Have. Arthritis Care Res 2011, 63:963-972.
  • [18]Kralik D, Koch T, Price K, Howard N: Chronic illness self-management: taking action to create order. J Clin Nurs 2004, 13:259-267.
  • [19]Thorne S, Paterson BL, Russell C: The structure of everyday self-care decision making. Qual Health Res 2003, 13:1337-1352.
  • [20]Townsend A, Wyke S, Hunt K: Self-managing and managing self: practical and moral dilemmas in accounts of living with chronic illness. Chronic Illn 2006, 2:185-195.
  • [21]Kendall E, Rogers A: Extinguishing the social?: state sponsored self-care policy and the Chronic Disease Self-management Programme. Disability Soc 2007, 22:129-143.
  • [22]Taylor D, Bury M: Chronic Illness, expert patients and care transition. Sociol Health Illness 2007, 29:27-45.
  • [23]Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P: Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2010, 340:c869.
  • [24]Kennedy AP, Rogers AE, Bower P: Support for self care for patients with chronic disease. BMJ 2007, 335:968-970.
  • [25]Kennedy AP, Nelson E, Reeves D, Richardson G, Roberts C, Robinson A, Rogers AE, Sculpher M, Thompson DG: A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost of a patient orientated self-management approach to chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2004, 53:1639-1645.
  • [26]Robinson A, Lee V, Kennedy A, Middleton L, Rogers A, Thompson DG, Reeves D: A randomised controlled trial of self-help interventions in patients with a primary care diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 2006, 55:643-648.
  • [27]Kennedy A, Bower P, Reeves D, Blakeman T, Bowen R, Chew-Graham C, Eden M, Fullwood C, Gaffney H, Gardner C, Lee V, Morris R, Protheroe J, Richardson G, Sanders C, Swallow A, Thompson D, Rogers A: Implementation of self management support for long term conditions in routine primary care settings: cluster randomised controlled trial. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2882] webciteBMJ 2013, 346:f2882. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2882
  • [28]Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A: Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care 2005, 14:26-33.
  • [29]Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles M: From theory to Intervention: Mapping Theoretically Derived Behavioural Determinants to Behaviour Change Techniques. Applied Psychol 2008, 57:66-680.
  • [30]Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R: The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Sci 2011, 6:42. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 BioMed Central Full Text
  • [31]Grol R: Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ 1997, 315:418-421.
  • [32]Silverman J, Kurt S, Draper J: Skills for Communicating with Patients. Radcliffe Publishing, Oxford; 2005.
  • [33]May T: Social Research: Issues, methods and process. Open University Press, Buckingham; 1993.
  • [34]May C, Finch T: Implementing, embedding and integrating practices: an outline of Normalisation Process Theory. Sociol 2009, 43:535-554.
  • [35]Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krle¿a-Jeri? K, Hróbjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin J, Doré C, Parulekar W, Summerskill W, Groves T, Schulz K, Sox H, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D: SPIRIT: Statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013, 2013(158):200-207.
  • [36]Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin J, Dickersin K, Hróbjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krle¿a-Jeri? K, Laupacis A, Moher D: SPIRIT 2013b Explanation and Elaboration: Guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013, 346:e7586.
  • [37]Dziedzic KS, Healey EL, Main CJ: Implementing the NICE osteoarthritis guidelines in primary care: a role for practice nurses. Musculoskeletal Care 2013, 11:1.
  • [38]Grime J, Dudley B: Developing written information on OA for patients: facilitating user involvement by exposure to qualitative research. Health Expect 2011, ?:?. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00741
  • [39]Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW: Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003, 41:582-92.
  • [40]Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD: A 12-item short form health survey (SF-12): Construction and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996, 32:220-33.
  • [41]Lorig K, Chastain R, Ung E, Shoor S, Holman HR: Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1989, 32:37-44.
  • [42]Pham T, van der Heijde D, Altman RD, Anderson JJ, Bellamy N, Hochberg M, Simon L, Strand V, Woodworth T, Dougados M: OMERACT-OARSI initiative: Osteoarthritis Research Society International set of responder criteria for osteoarthritis clinical trials revisited. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004, 12:389-399.
  • [43]Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DB: Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J Am Stat Assoc 1996, 91:444-455.
  • [44]Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B: A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006, 166:1092-1097.
  • [45]Group EQ: EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990, 16:199-208.
  • [46]Matthews CE, Ainsworth BE, Hanby C, Pate RR, Addy C, Freedson PS, Jones DA, Macera CA: Development and testing of a short physical activity recall questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005, 37:986-994.
  • [47]Jinks C, Jordan K, Ong BN, Croft P: A brief screening tool for knee pain in primary care (KNEST) 2. Results from a survey in the general population aged 50 and over. Rheumatology 2004, 43:55-61.
  • [48]Edwards JJ, Khanna M, Jordan KP, Jordan JL, Bedson J, Dziedzic KS: Quality indicators for the primary care of osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis 2013, ?:?. Published On-line First: 27 November 2013. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203913
  • [49]Mead N, Bower P, Roland M: The General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) ¿ Development and psychometric characteristics. BMC Fam Pract 2008, 9:13. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [50]Charmaz K: Constructing grounded theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage Publications Ltd, London; 2006.
  • [51][http://www.mrc.ac.uk/documents/pdf/complex-interventions-guidance/] webcite Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating Complex interventions: new guidance.MRC 2008, .
  • [52]Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW: Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833-1840.
  • [53]Meenan RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ, Guccione AA, Kazis LE: AIMS2: The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1992, 35:1-10.
  • [54]Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P: International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003, 35:1381-1395.
  • [55]Washburn RA, Smith K, Jette AM, Janney CA: The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epi 1993, 46:153-162.
  • [56]van der Windt DA, van der Heijden GJ, de Winter AF, Koes BW, Deville W, Bouter L: The responsiveness of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire. Ann Rheum Dis 1998, 57:82-87.
  • [57]Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Berry JT, Mokdad AH: The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affective Disorders 2009, 114:163-173.
  • [58]Brazier JE, Roberts J: The Estimation of a Preference-Based Measure of Health from the SF-12. Med Care 2004, 42:851-859.
  • [59]Al-Janabi H, Flynn T, Coast J: Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res 2012, 21:167-176.
  • [60]Østerås N, Garratt A, Grotle M, Natvig , Kjeken I, Kvien TK, Hagen KB: Patient-reported quality of care for osteoarthritis: development and testing of the osteoarthritis quality indicator questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res 2013, 65:1043-1051.
  • [61]Howie J, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ: A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract 1998, 15:165-171.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:25次 浏览次数:9次