Implementing international osteoarthritis treatment guidelines in primary health care: study protocol for the SAMBA stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial

Implementation Science

Kåre Birger Hagen⁹  Thea Vliet Vlieland³  Unni-Berit Schjervheim⁴  Jan Harald Røtterud⁶  Bård Natvig¹  Ibrahim Mdala¹  Øyvor Andreassen⁷  Eline Aas²  Tuva Moseng⁹  Krysia Dziedzic⁵  Leti van Bodegom-Vos⁸  Nina Østerås⁹ 

[1] Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, J11-S, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands;Health and Social Services, Nes Municipality, Norway;Arthritis Research UK, Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK;Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway;Patient Research Panel, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Vinderen, Oslo, 0319, Norway;Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, J10-S, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands;National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Vinderen, Oslo, 0319, Norway

关键词: Self-management;    General practice;    Primary care;    Implementation;    Osteoarthritis;   

Others  :  1235178
DOI  :  10.1186/s13012-015-0353-7

 received in 2015-11-13, accepted in 2015-11-19,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Previous research indicates that people with osteoarthritis (OA) are not receiving the recommended and optimal treatment. Based on international treatment recommendations for hip and knee OA and previous research, the SAMBA model for integrated OA care in Norwegian primary health care has been developed. The model includes physiotherapist (PT) led patient OA education sessions and an exercise programme lasting 8–12 weeks. This study aims to assess the effectiveness, feasibility, and costs of a tailored strategy to implement the SAMBA model.

Methods/design

A cluster randomized controlled trial with stepped wedge design including an effect, process, and cost evaluation will be conducted in six municipalities (clusters) in Norway. The municipalities will be randomized for time of crossover from current usual care to the implementation of the SAMBA model by a tailored strategy. The tailored strategy includes interactive workshops for general practitioners (GPs) and PTs in primary care covering the SAMBA model for integrated OA care, educational material, educational outreach visits, feedback, and reminder material. Outcomes will be measured at the patient, GP, and PT levels using self-report, semi-structured interviews, and register based data. The primary outcome measure is patient-reported quality of care (OsteoArthritis Quality Indicator questionnaire) at 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include referrals to PT, imaging, and referrals to the orthopaedic surgeon as well as participants’ treatment satisfaction, symptoms, physical activity level, body weight, and self-reported and measured lower limb function. The actual exposure to the tailor made implementation strategy and user experiences will be measured in a process evaluation. In the economic evaluation, the difference in costs of usual OA care and the SAMBA model for integrated OA care will be compared with the difference in health outcomes and reported by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

Discussion

The results from the present study will add to the current knowledge on tailored strategies, which aims to improve the uptake of evidence-based OA care recommendations and improve the quality of OA care in primary health care. The new knowledge can be used in national and international initiatives designed to improve the quality of OA care.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02333656

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Østerås et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Bijlsma JW, Berenbaum F, Lafeber FP. Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice. Lancet. 2011; 377:2115-26.
• [2]Osteoarthritis. In: Care and management in adults. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London (UK); 2014: p.36. Clinical guideline; no. 177
• [3]Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M et al.. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2013; 380:2163-96.
• [4]Bitton R. The economic burden of osteoarthritis. Am J Manag Care. 2009; 15:S230-S5.
• [5]Ghomrawi HM, Schackman BR, Mushlin AI. Appropriateness criteria and elective procedures—total joint arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367:2467-9.
• [6]Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, Benkhalti M, Guyatt G, McGowan J et al.. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012; 64:455-74.
• [7]Fernandes L, Hagen KB, Bijlsma JW, Andreassen O, Christensen P, Conaghan PG et al.. EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 72:1125-35.
• [8]McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Arden NK, Berenbaum F, Bierma-Zeinstra SM et al.. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014; 22:363-88.
• [9]Referansegruppen for muskel- skjelettlidelser i Norsk Forening for Allmennmedisin. Råd og anbefalinger for riktig bruk av bildediagnostikk ved muskel-skjelettlidelser i allmennpraksis. Oslo: Norsk Forening for Allmennmedisin; 2010.
• [10]Werner EL, Gross DP. The effects of a media campaign on beliefs and utilization of imaging examinations in Norwegian patients with low back pain. Nor Epidemiol. 2009; 19:73-8.
• [11]Porcheret M, Jordan K, Croft P. Treatment of knee pain in older adults in primary care: development of an evidence-based model of care. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007; 46:638-48.
• [12]Smink AJ, van den Ende CH, Vliet Vlieland TP, Swierstra BA, Kortland JH, Bijlsma JW et al.. “Beating osteoARThritis”: development of a stepped care strategy to optimize utilization and timing of non-surgical treatment modalities for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2011; 30:1623-9.
• [13]Smink AJ, Dekker J, Vliet Vlieland TP, Swierstra BA, Kortland JH, Bijlsma JW et al.. Health care use of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee after implementation of a stepped-care strategy: an observational study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014; 66:817-27.
• [14]Smink AJ, van den Ende CH, Vliet Vlieland TP, Bijlsma JW, Swierstra BA, Kortland JH et al.. Effect of stepped care on health outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis: an observational study in Dutch general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2014; 64:e538-44.
• [15]Dziedzic KS, Healey EL, Porcheret M, Ong B, Main CJ, Jordan KP et al.. Implementing the NICE osteoarthritis guidelines: a mixed methods study and cluster randomised trial of a model osteoarthritis consultation in primary care—the Management of OsteoArthritis In Consultations (MOSAICS) study protocol. Implement Sci. 2014; 9:95. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Brand CA, Amatya B, Gordon B, Tosti T, Gorelik A. Redesigning care for chronic conditions: improving hospital-based ambulatory care for people with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Intern Med J. 2010; 40:427-36.
• [17]Thorstensson CA, Garellick G, Rystedt H, Dahlberg LE. Better management of patients with osteoarthritis: development and nationwide implementation of an evidence-based supported osteoarthritis self-management programme. Musculoskeletal Care. 2014.
• [18]Skou ST, Roos EM. GLA:D annual report 2013. 2014. In Danish http://static. sdu.dk/mediafiles/3/7/9/%7B37906925-09A4-45D3-A93D-38F718FD3150%7DAarsrapport2013GodtLivmedArtroseiDanmark.pdf Accessed 26 Oct 2015.
• [19]Avklaring av ansvars-og oppgavedeling mellom kommunene og spesialisthelsetjenesten på rehabiliteringsområdet IS-1947. The Norwegian Directorate of Health, Oslo; 2012.
• [20]Østeras N, Garratt A, Grotle M, Natvig B, Kjeken I, Kvien TK et al.. Patient-reported quality of care for osteoarthritis: development and testing of the osteoarthritis quality indicator questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013; 65:1043-51.
• [21]Gronhaug G, Osteras N, Hagen K. Quality of hip and knee osteoarthritis management in primary health care in a Norwegian county: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:598. BioMed Central Full Text
• [22]Finset A. One size does not fit all: how to talk to patients about obesity. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 76:147-8.
• [23]Clarson LE, Nicholl BI, Bishop A, Edwards JJ, Daniel R, Mallen CD. Monitoring osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional survey in general practice. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2013; 6:85-91.
• [24]Jamtvedt G, Dahm KT, Holm I, Flottorp S. Measuring physiotherapy performance in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a prospective study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8:145. BioMed Central Full Text
• [25]Effects of organised follow-up of behaviour that may increase risk of disease in adults. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo; 2012. Report No. : 978-82-8121-497-2
• [26]Guide for primary health care frisklivssentraler. Establishment and organising. Norwegian Directorate of Health, Oslo; 2013. In Norwegian
• [27]Denison E UV, Berg RC, Vist GE. Effects of more than three months organized follow-up on physical activity and diet for people with increased risk of lifestyle related disease [In Norwegian]. Report no. 16−2014. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2014.
• [28]National health and care services plan. Norwegian Ministry of Health Care Services, Oslo; 2011. In Norwegian
• [29]Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ. 1995; 153:1423-31.
• [30]Aakhus E, Flottorp SA, Oxman AD. Implementing evidence-based guidelines for managing depression in elderly patients: a Norwegian perspective. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012; 21:237-40.
• [31]Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust. 2004; 180:S57-60.
• [32]Sanders T, Foster NE, Ong BN. Perceptions of general practitioners towards the use of a new system for treating back pain: a qualitative interview study. BMC Med. 2011; 9:49. BioMed Central Full Text
• [33]Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA et al.. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999; 282:1458-65.
• [34]Ong BN, Morden A, Brooks L, Porcheret M, Edwards JJ, Sanders T et al.. Changing policy and practice: making sense of national guidelines for osteoarthritis. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 106:101-9.
• [35]Bernhardsson S, Johansson K, Nilsen P, Oberg B, Larsson ME. Determinants of guideline use in primary care physical therapy: a cross-sectional survey of attitudes, knowledge, and behavior. Phys Ther. 2014; 94:343-54.
• [36]Brand CA, Ackerman IN, Tropea J. Chronic disease management: improving care for people with osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014; 28:119-42.
• [37]Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, Shaw EJ, Cheater F, Flottorp S et al. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:CD005470. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub2.
• [38]Prior M, Guerin M, Grimmer-Somers K. The effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies—a synthesis of systematic review findings. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008; 14:888-97.
• [39]Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K et al.. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158:200-7.
• [40]Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148:295-309.
• [41]Brown CA, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6:54. BioMed Central Full Text
• [42]Pham T, van der Heijde D, Altman RD, Anderson JJ, Bellamy N, Hochberg M et al.. OMERACT-OARSI initiative: Osteoarthritis Research Society International set of responder criteria for osteoarthritis clinical trials revisited. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004; 12:389-99.
• [43]Stratford P, Gill C, Westaway M, Binkley J. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Can. 1995; 47:258-63.
• [44]Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1998; 8:439-48.
• [45]Klassbo M, Larsson E, Mannevik E. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Scand J Rheumatol. 2003; 32:46-51.
• [46]The coordination reform. Proper treatment—at the right place and right time. Norwegian Ministry of Health Care Services, Oslo; 2009.
• [47]Kurtze N, Rangul V, Hustvedt BE, Flanders WD. Reliability and validity of self-reported physical activity in the Nord-Trondelag health study: HUNT 1. Scand J Public Health. 2008; 36:52-61.
• [48]Skudal KE, Garratt AM, Eriksson B, Leinonen T, Simonsen J, Bjertnaes OA. The Nordic Patient Experiences Questionnaire (NORPEQ): cross-national comparison of data quality, internal consistency and validity in four Nordic countries. BMJ Open. 2012;2.
• [49]EuroQo LG. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The Euro Qol Group Health Policy. 1990; 16:199-208.
• [50]Jones CJ, Rikli RE, Beam WC. A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q ExercSport. 1999; 70:113-9.
• [51]ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002; 166:111-7.
• [52]Cataneo DC, Cataneo AJ. Accuracy of the stair climbing test using maximal oxygen uptake as the gold standard. J Bras Pneumol. 2007; 33:128-33.