Improving patient notification of solid abdominal viscera incidental findings with a standardized protocol

Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes

Jon D Dorfman¹  Jennifer LaFemina¹  Giles F Whalen¹  Timothy A Emhoff¹  Babak Movahedi¹  Theodore McDade¹  Nicole Cherng¹  Courtney E Collins¹ 

[1] University of Massachusetts Medical School and UMass Memorial, Worcester, MA, USA

关键词: Quality improvement;    Abdominal CT;    Computed tomography;    Incidental finding;    Trauma;   

Others  :  1132827
DOI  :  10.1186/s13032-014-0022-x

【 摘 要 】

Background

The increasing use of computed tomography (CT) scans in the evaluation of trauma patients has led to increased detection of incidental radiologic findings. Incidental findings (IFs) of the abdominal viscera are among the most commonly discovered lesions and can carry a risk of malignancy. Despite this, patient notification regarding these findings is often inadequate.

Methods

We identified patients who underwent abdominopelvic CTs as part of their trauma evaluation during a recent 1-year period (9/2011-8/2012). Patients with IFs of the kidneys, liver, adrenal glands, pancreas and/or ovaries had their charts reviewed for documentation of the lesion in their discharge paperwork or follow-up. A quality improvement project was initiated where patients with abdominal IFs were verbally informed of the finding, it was noted on their discharge summary and/or were referred to specialists for evaluation. Nine months after the implementation of the IF protocol, a second chart review was performed to determine if the rate of patient notification improved.

Results

Of 1,117 trauma patients undergoing abdominopelvic CT scans during the 21 month study period, 239 patients (21.4%) had 292 incidental abdominal findings. Renal lesions were the most common (146 patients, 13% of all patients) followed by hepatic (95/8.4%) and adrenal (38/3.4%) lesions. Pancreatic (10/0.9%) and ovarian lesions (3/0.3%) were uncommon. Post-IF protocol implementation patient notification regarding IFs improved by over 80% (32.4% vs. 17.7% pre-protocol, p = 0.02).

Conclusion

IFs of the solid abdominal organs are common in trauma patients undergoing abdominopelvic CT scan. Patient notification regarding these lesions is often inadequate. A systematic approach to the documentation and evaluation of incidental radiologic findings can significantly improve the rate of patient notification.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Collins et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Fernandez-del Castillo C, Targarona J, Thayer SP, Rattner DW, Brugge W, Warshaw AL: Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients. Arch Surg 2003, 138(4):427-423. discussion 433–424
• [2]Bulow B, Jansson S, Juhlin C, Steen L, Thoren M, Wahrenberg H, Valdemarsson S, Wangberg B, Ahren B: Adrenal incidentaloma - follow-up results from a Swedish prospective study. Eur J Endocrinol 2006, 154(3):419-23.
• [3]Lahat G, Ben Haim M, Nachmany J, Sever R, Blachar A, Nakache R, Klausner JM: Pancreatic incidentalomas: high rate of potentially malignant tumors. J Am Coll Surg 2009, 209(3):313-9.
• [4]O’Connor SD, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Oliva MR, Silverman SG: Incidental finding of renal masses at unenhanced CT: prevalence and analysis of features for guiding management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011, 197(1):139-45.
• [5]Paluska TR, Sise MJ, Sack DI, Sise CB, Egan MC, Biondi M: Incidental CT findings in trauma patients: incidence and implications for care of the injured. J Trauma 2007, 62(1):157-61.
• [6]Barrett TW, Schierling M, Zhou C, Colfax JD, Russ S, Conatser P, Lancaster P, Wrenn K: Prevalence of incidental findings in trauma patients detected by computed tomography imaging. Am J Emerg Med 2009, 27(4):428-35.
• [7]Devine AS, Jackson CS, Lyons L, Mason JD: Frequency of incidental findings on computed tomography of trauma patients. West J Emerg Med 2010, 11(1):24-7.
• [8]Ekeh AP, Walusimbi M, Brigham E, Woods RJ, McCarthy MC: The prevalence of incidental findings on abdominal computed tomography scans of trauma patients. J Emerg Med 2010, 38(4):484-9.
• [9]Thompson RJ, Wojcik SM, Grant WD, Ko PY: Incidental Findings on CT Scans in the Emergency Department. Emerg Med Int 2011, 2011:624847.
• [10]Huynh TT, Moran KR, Blackburn AH, Jacobs DG, Thomason MH, Sing RF: Optimal management strategy for incidental findings in trauma patients: an initiative for midlevel providers. J Trauma 2008, 65(2):331-4. discussion 335–336
• [11]Munk MD, Peitzman AB, Hostler DP, Wolfson AB: Frequency and follow-up of incidental findings on trauma computed tomography scans: experience at a level one trauma center. J Emerg Med 2010, 38(3):346-50.
• [12]Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG: Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009, 42(2):377-81.
• [13]Administration on Aging. Aging statistics: Projected future growth of the older population. By age: 1900–2050. Persons 65 and older. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC; 2010.
• [14]Mann NC, Cahn RM, Mullins RJ, Brand DM, Jurkovich GJ: Survival among injured geriatric patients during construction of a statewide trauma system. J Trauma 2001, 50(6):1111-6.
• [15]Terada N, Arai Y, Kinukawa N, Terai A: The 10-year natural history of simple renal cysts. Urology 2008, 71(1):7-11. discussion 11–12
• [16]Handrich SJ, Hough DM, Fletcher JG, Sarr MG: The natural history of the incidentally discovered small simple pancreatic cyst: long-term follow-up and clinical implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005, 184(1):20-3.
• [17]Nieman LK: Approach to the patient with an adrenal incidentaloma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010, 95(9):4106-13.
• [18]Bradley AJ, Lim YY, Singh FM: Imaging features, follow-up, and management of incidentally detected renal lesions. Clin Radiol 2011, 66(12):1129-39.
• [19]Ehrl D, Rothaug K, Herzog P, Hofer B, Rau HG: “Incidentaloma” of the liver: management of a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. HPB Surg 2012, 2012:891787.
• [20]Yeh DD, Imam AM, Truong SH, McLaughlin EL, Klein EN, Avery LL, Velmahos GC: Incidental findings in trauma patients: dedicated communication with the primary care physician ensures adequate follow-up. World J Surg 2013, 37(9):2081-5.
• [21]Schwartz LH, Gandras EJ, Colangelo SM, Ercolani MC, Panicek DM: Prevalence and importance of small hepatic lesions found at CT in patients with cancer. Radiology 1999, 210(1):71-4.
• [22]Sperry JL, Massaro MS, Collage RD, Nicholas DH, Forsythe RM, Watson GA, Marshall GT, Alarcon LH, Billiar TR, Peitzman AB: Incidental radiographic findings after injury: dedicated attention results in improved capture, documentation, and management. Surgery 2010, 148(4):618-24.