A multilevel analysis of social capital and self-reported health: evidence from Seoul, South Korea

International Journal for Equity in Health

Hee-Sun Lee¹  Heaseung Kim²  Sehee Han¹ 

[1] Department of Public Administration, Hanyang University, 17 Haengdang-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 133-791, South Korea;Graduate School of Public Policy, Hanyang University, 17 Haengdang-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 133-791, South Korea

关键词: Seoul;    South Korea;    multilevel analysis;    self-reported health;    Social capital;   

Others  :  829378
DOI  :  10.1186/1475-9276-11-3

 received in 2011-07-26, accepted in 2012-01-26,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

This study aims to resolve two limitations of previous studies. First, as only a few studies examining social capital have been conducted in non-western countries, it is inconclusive that the concept, which has been developed in Western societies, applies similarly to an Asian context. Second, this study considers social capital at the individual-level, area-level and cross-levels of interaction and examines its associations with health while simultaneously controlling for various confounders at both the individual-level and area-level, whereas previous studies only considered one of the two levels. The purpose of this study is therefore to examine the associations between social capital and health by using multilevel analysis after controlling for various confounders both at the individual and area-levels (i.e., concentrated disadvantage) in non-western countries.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey from December 2010 to April 2011 in Seoul, South Korea. The target population included respondents aged 25 years and older who have resided in the same administrative area since 2008. The final sample for this study consisted of 4,730 respondents within all 25 of Seoul's administrative areas.

Results

In our final model, individual-level social capital, including network sources (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.11-1.37) and organizational participation (OR = 2.55; 95% CI = 2.11-3.08) was positively associated with good/very good health. Interestingly, the individual × area organizational participation cross-level interaction was negatively associated with good/very good health (OR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.32-0.50), indicating that in areas with higher organizational participation, individuals with high organizational participation were less likely to report good/very good health when compared to low organizational participation individuals.

Conclusion

Our study provides evidence that individual-level social capital is associated with self-reported health, even after controlling for both individual and area-level confounders. Although this study did not find significant relationships between area-level organizational participation and self-reported health, this study found the cross-level interaction for social capital. Hence, in areas with lower organizational participation, the probability of reporting good/very good health is higher for individuals with high organizational participation than individuals with low organizational participation. This study, albeit tentatively, suggests that policy makers should focus upon social capital when making policies which aim to enhance one's health.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Han et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Araya R, Dunstan F, Playle R, Thomas H, Palmer S, Lewis G: Perceptions of social capital and the built environment and mental health. Soc Sci Med 2006, 62(12):3072-3083.
• [2]Fone D, Dunstan F, Lloyd K, Williams G, Watkins J, Palmer S: Does social cohesion modify the association between area income deprivation and mental health? A multilevel analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2007, 36(2):338-345.
• [3]Poortinga W: Social relations or social capital? Individual and community health effects of bonding social capital. Soc Sci Med 2006, 63(1):255-270.
• [4]Veenstra G: Location, location, location: contextual and compositional health effects of social capital in British Columbia, Canada. Soc Sci Med 2005, 60(9):2059-2071.
• [5]van Hooijdonk C, Droomers M, Deerenberg IM, Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE: The diversity in associations between community social capital and health per health outcome, population group and location studied. Int J Epidemiol 2008, 37(6):1384-1392.
• [6]Mansyur C, Amick B, Harist RB, Franzini L: Social capital, income inequality, and self-rated health in 45 countries. Soc Sci Med 2008, 66(1):43-56.
• [7]Subramanian SV, Kim DJ, Kawachi I: Social trust and self-rated health in U.S. communities: a multilevel analysis. J Urban Health 2002, 79(Suppl 1):21-34.
• [8]Portes A: Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu Rev Sociol 1998, 24:1-24.
• [9]Rahn WM, Transue JE: Social trust and value change: the decline of social capital in American youth, 1976-1995. Polit Psychol 1998, 19(3):545-565.
• [10]Lin N: Building a network theory of social capital. Connections 1999, 22(1):28-51.
• [11]Kawachi I, Berkman L: Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In Social Epidemiology. Edited by Berkman L, Kawachi I. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:174-190.
• [12]Ram R: Social capital and happiness: additional cross-country evidence. J Happiness Stud 2010, 11(4):409-418.
• [13]Flap H, Völker B: Goal specific social capital and job satisfaction: effects of different types of networks on instrumental and social aspects of work. Soc Networks 2001, 23(4):297-320.
• [14]Adger WN: Social capital, collective action and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 2003, 79(4):387-404.
• [15]Helliwell JF: Well-being and social capital: does suicide pose a puzzle? Soc Indic Res 2007, 81(3):455-496.
• [16]Snelgrove JW, Pikhart H, Stafford M: A multilevel analysis of social capital and self-rated health: evidence from the British household panel survey. Soc Sci Med 2009, 68(11):1993-2001.
• [17]Yip W, Subramanian SV, Mitchell AD, Lee DTS, Wang J, Kawachi I: Does social capital enhance health and well-being? Evidence from rural China. Soc Sci Med 2007, 64(1):35-49.
• [18]Chuang AC, Chuang KY: Gender differences in relationships between social capital and individual smoking and drinking behavior in Taiwan. Soc Sci Med 2008, 67(8):1321-1330.
• [19]Fukuyama F: Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: The Free Press; 1995.
• [20]Paxton P: Social capital and democracy: an interdependent relationship. Am Sociol Rev 2002, 67(2):254-277.
• [21]Beaulieua LJ, Israelb GD, Hartlessc G, Dyk P: For whom does the school bell toll?: Multi-contextual presence of social capital and student educational achievement. J Socio-Econ 2001, 30(2):121-127.
• [22]Dean WR, Sharkey JR: Food insecurity, social capital and perceived personal disparity in a predominantly rural region of Texas: an individual-level analysis. Soc Sci Med 2011, 72(9):1454-1462.
• [23]Ichida Y, Kondo K, Hirai H, Hanibuchi T, Yoshikawa G, Murata C: Social capital, income inequality and self-rated health in Chita peninsula, Japan: a multilevel analysis of older people in 25 communities. Soc Sci Med 2009, 69(4):489-499.
• [24]Sundquist K, Yang M: Linking social capital and self-rated health: a multilevel analysis of 11,175 men and women in Sweden. Health Place 2007, 13(2):324-334.
• [25]Kawachi I, Kim D, Coutts A, Subramanian SV: Reconciling the three accounts of social capital. Int J Epidemiol 2004, 33(4):682-690.
• [26]Kim D, Kawachi I: U.S. state-level social capital and health-related quality of life: multilevel evidence of main, mediating, and modifying effects. Ann Epidemiol 2007, 17(4):258-269.
• [27]Beaudoin CE: Bonding and bridging neighborliness: an individual-level study in the context of health. Soc Sci Med 2009, 68(12):2129-2136.
• [28]Berry HL, Welsh JA: Social capital and health in Australia: an overview from the household, income and labour dynamics in Australia survey. Soc Sci Med 2010, 70(4):588-596.
• [29]Nieminen T, Martelin T, Koskinen S, Aro H, Alanen E, Hyyppä MT: Social capital as a determinant of self-rated health and psychological well-being. Int J Public Health 2010, 55(6):531-542.
• [30]Van Der Gaag M, Snijders TAB: The resource generator: social capital quantification with concrete items. Soc Networks 2005, 27(1):1-29.
• [31]Bourdieu P: The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology and Education. Edited by Richardson JG. New York: Greenwood; 1986:241-258.
• [32]Coleman JS: Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 1988, 94:95-121.
• [33]Lin N, Ye X, Ensel WM: Social support and depressed mood: a structural analysis. J Health Soc Behav 1999, 40(4):344-359.
• [34]Putnam RD: Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2000.
• [35]Snijders TAB: Prologue to the measurement of social capital. La Revue Tocqueville 1999, 20(1):27-44.
• [36]Poortinga W: Social capital: An individual or collective resource for health? Soc Sci Med 2006, 62(2):292-302.
• [37]Kawachi I: Social capital and health: making the connections one step at a time. Int J Epidemiol 2006, 35(4):989-993.
• [38]Newton K: Social capital and democracy. Am Behav Sci 1997, 40(5):575-586.
• [39]Woolcock M: Social capital and economic development: towards a theoretical syntheses and policy framework. Theor Soc 1998, 27(2):151-208.
• [40]Lin N: A network theory of social capital. In Handbook on Social Capital. Edited by Castiglione D, van Deth J, Wolleb G. New York: Oxford; 2005:50-69.
• [41]Lin N, Erickson BH: Theory, measurement, and the research enterprise on social capital. In Social Capital: An International Research Program. Edited by Lin N, Erickson BH. New York: Oxford; 2008:1-24.
• [42]Bekkers R, Volker B, van der Gaag M, Flap H: Social networks of participants in voluntary associations. In Social Capital: An International Research Program. Edited by Lin N, Erickson BH. New York: Oxford; 2008:185-205.
• [43]Magee MP: Civic participation and social capital: a social network analysis in two American counties. In Social Capital: An International Research Program. Edited by Lin N, Erickson BH. New York: Oxford; 2008:308-327.
• [44]Fujisawa Y, Hamano T, Takegawa S: Social capital and perceived health in Japan: an ecological and multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med 2009, 69(4):500-505.
• [45]Mohnen SM, Groenewegen PP, Völker B, Flap H: Neighborhood social capital and individual health. Soc Sci Med 2011, 72(5):660-667.
• [46]Kawachi I: Income inequality and health. In Social Epidemiology. Edited by Berkman LF, Kawachi I. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:76-94.
• [47]Picket KE, Pearl M: Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001, 55(2):111-122.
• [48]Subramanian SV, Kawachi I: Income inequality and health: what have we learned so far? Epidemiol Rev 2004, 26(1):78-91.
• [49]Szreter S, Woolcock M: Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. Int J Epidemiol 2004, 33(4):650-667.
• [50]Seoul statistics [http://stat.seoul.go.kr/] webcite
• [51]Idler EL, Kasl S: Health perceptions and survival: do global evaluations of health status really predict mortality? J Gerontol 1991, 46(2):S55-S65.
• [52]Idler EL, Benyamini Y: Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 1997, 38(1):21-37.
• [53]Lin N, Dumin M: Access to occupations through social ties. Soc Networks 1986, 8(4):356-385.
• [54]Choi TR: Changes in occupational prestige. The Review of Korean Sociology 2001, 1:67-100.
• [55]Goldstein H: Multilevel Statistical Models. 3rd edition. London: Arnold; 2003.
• [56]Snijders TAB, Bosker R: Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. SAGE publications Ltd: London; 1999.
• [57]Habibov NN, Afandi EN: Self-rated health and social capital in transitional countries: multilevel analysis of comparative surveys in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. Soc Sci Med 2011, 72(7):1193-1204.
• [58]Sen A: Health: perception versus observation. BMJ 2002, 324:860-861.
• [59]Murray JL, Chen LC: Understanding morbidity change. Popul Dev Rev 1992, 18(3):481-503.
• [60]Kim D, Kawachi I: A Multilevel analysis of key forms of community and individual level social capital as predictors. J Urban Health 2006, 83(5):813-826.
• [61]Carpiano RM: Neighborhood social capital and adult health: an empirical test of a bourdieu-based model. Health Place 2007, 13(3):639-655.
• [62]Hox J: Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge; 2010.
• [63]Caughy MO, O'Campo PJ, Muntaner C: When being alone might be better: neighborhood poverty, social capital, and child mental health. Soc Sci Med 2003, 57(2):227-237.
• [64]Harpham T, Grant E, Thomas E: Measuring social capital within health surveys: key issues. health policy plann 2002, 17(1):106-111.
• [65]Leyden KM: Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. Am J Public Health 2003, 93(9):1546-1551.