Assessment of graduate public health education in Nepal and perceived needs of faculty and students

Human Resources for Health

Frederick A Connell²  Virginia Gonzales¹  Stephen A Bezruchka¹  Agya Mahat¹ 

[1] Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA;Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

关键词: E-learning;    Global health;    Collaboration;    Nepal;    Graduate public health education;    Public health;   

Others  :  822550
DOI  :  10.1186/1478-4491-11-16

 received in 2012-10-02, accepted in 2013-04-06,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Despite the large body of evidence suggesting that effective public health infrastructure is vital to improving the health status of populations, many universities in developing countries offer minimal opportunities for graduate training in public health. In Nepal, for example, only two institutions currently offer a graduate public health degree. Both institutions confer only a general Masters in Public Health (MPH), and together produce 30 graduates per year. The objective of this assessment was to identify challenges in graduate public health education in Nepal, and explore ways to address these challenges.

Methods

The assessment included in-person school visits and data collection through semi-structured in-depth interviews with primary stakeholders of Nepal’s public health academic sector. The 72 participants included faculty, students, alumni, and leaders of institutions that offered MPH programs, and the leadership of one government-funded institution that is currently developing an MPH program. Data were analyzed through content analysis to identify major themes.

Results

Six themes characterizing the challenges of expanding and improving graduate public health training were identified: 1) a shortage of trained public health faculty, with consequent reliance on the internet to compensate for inadequate teaching resources; 2) teaching/learning cultures and bureaucratic traditions that are not optimal for graduate education; 3) within-institution dominance of clinical medicine over public health; 4) a desire for practice–oriented, contextually relevant training opportunities; 5) a demand for degree options in public health specialties (for example, epidemiology); and 6) a strong interest in international academic collaboration.

Conclusion

Despite an enormous need for trained public health professionals, Nepal’s educational institutions face barriers to developing effective graduate programs. Overcoming these barriers will require: 1) increasing the investment in public health education and 2) improving the academic environment of educational institutions. Long term, committed academic collaborations with international universities may be a realistic way to: 1) redress immediate inadequacies in resources, including teachers; 2) encourage learning environments that promote inquiry, creativity, problem-solving, and critical thinking; and 3) support development of the in-country capacity of local institutions to produce a cadre of competent, well-trained public health practitioners, researchers, teachers, and leaders.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Mahat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]World Bank: Data. Nepal; 2011. [http://data.worldbank.org/country/nepal webcite]
• [2]IHME: Building Momentum Global Progress toward reducing Maternal and Child Mortality. Seattle: Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington; 2010.
• [3]WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, Bank TW: Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2008. Geneva: World Health Organization, World Bank, UNICEF, United Nations Population Fund; 2010.
• [4]MOHP N, ERA N, Inc MI: Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2006. Kathmandu: Ministry of Health and Population (Nepal), New ERA, Macro International Inc; 2007.
• [5]UNDP: Nepal Human Development Report 2004: Empowerment and Poverty Reduction. Kathmandu: United Nations Development Programme; 2004.
• [6]Nepal Medical Council: Recognized Institution- Medical-College. 2012. [http://www.nmc.org.np/recognized-institution/medical-college.html webcite]
• [7]WHO: World Health Statistics 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
• [8]Ministry of Health and Population Government of Nepal: Nepal Health Sector Program- Implementation Plan II (2010–2015). Kathmandu: MOHP; 2010.
• [9]Huntington I, Shrestha S, Reich NG, Hagopian A: Career intentions of medical students in the setting of Nepal’s rapidly expanding private medical education system. Health Policy Plan 2012, 27(5):417-28.
• [10]Rai SK, Rai G, Hirai K, Abe A, Ohno Y: The health system in Nepal–an introduction. Environ Health Prev Med 2001, 6(1):1-8.
• [11]Dixit H: The quest for health: the health services of Nepal. Kathmandu: Educational Enterprise (P) Ltd; 1999.
• [12]Marahatta SB, Sinha NP, Dixit H, Shrestha IB, Pokharel PK: Comparative study of community medicine practice in MBBS curriculum of health institutions of Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2009, 7(28):461-469.
• [13]Marahatta SB: Community based medical education: prospects and challenges. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2009, 7(27):194-195.
• [14]Govt says 301 died of diarrhea-cholera epidemic. Rebublica; 2009. [http://archives.myrepublica.com/portal/index.php?action=news_details&news_id=8709 webcite]
• [15]IOM: Curriculum for Master of Public Health 2006. Kathmandu: Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Family Health; 2006.
• [16]South East Asia Public Health Education Institutes Network (SEAPHEIN)[http://www.seaphein.com/document/news/news_102.pdf webcite]
• [17]Karki A, Tully G: Patan Academy of Health Sciences. A brief review of its history, current status and challenges. In Patan Hospital Sliver Jubilee Souvenir 2007. Kathmandu: Patan Hospital; 2007.
• [18]Patan Academy of Health Sciences: Missions and Goals. [http://www.pahs.edu.np/about/mission/ webcite]
• [19]Jain SC: Education and training - capacity building. J Hlth Pop Dev Countries 2000, 3:39-42.
• [20]WHO (SEARO): Calcutta Declaration. Calcutta, India: Presented at the Regional Conference on Public Health in South-East Asia in the Twenty-First Century; 1999. November 22–24
• [21]Deodhar N: Public health systems in India with special reference to Schools of Public Health. New Delhi: Presented at the National Consultation on Institutes of Public Health In India - From Concept to Reality; 2004. September 16–17
• [22]Chowdhury A: A new school of public health in Bangladesh. In Global Forum Update on Research for Health Volume 2. Edited by Stephen M. London: Pro-Brook Publishing Limited; 2005:145-148.
• [23]Kahn K, Tollman SM: Planning professional education at schools of public health. Am J Public Health 1992, 82(12):1653-1657.
• [24]Linnan LA, Steckler A, Maman S, Ellenson M, French E, Blanchard L, Bowling M, Yamanis N, Succop S, Davenport A, Moracco B: Engaging key stakeholders to assess and improve the professional preparation of MPH health educators. Am J Public Health 2010, 100(10):1993-1999.
• [25]Demers AR, Mamary E: Assessing the professional development needs of public health educators in light of changing competencies. Prev Chronic Dis 2008., 5(4)
• [26]Dodds JM, Calleson DC, Eng E, Margolis L, Moore K: Structure and culture of schools of public health to support academic public health practice. J Public Health Manag Pract 2003, 9(6):504-512.
• [27]Bess JL: Teaching well and liking it: motivating faculty to teach effectively. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997.
• [28]Ijsselmuiden CB, Nchinda TC, Duale S, Tumwesigye NM, Serwadda D: Mapping Africa’s advanced public health education capacity: the AfriHealth project. Bull World Health Organ 2007, 85(12):914-922.
• [29]Burdick W: Challenges and issues in health professions education in Africa. Med Teach 2007, 29(9):882-886.
• [30]Reddy S: Establishing schools of public health in India. In Global Forum Update on Research for Health Volume 2. Edited by Stephen M. London: Pro-Brook Publishing Limited; 2005:149-153.
• [31]Ruis AR, Golden RN: The schism between medical and public health education: a historical perspective. Acad Med 2008, 83(12):1153-1157.
• [32]Fee E: Divorce between theory and practice: the system of public health training in the United States. Cien Saude Colet 2008, 13(3):841-851.
• [33]Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P, Kistnasamy B, Meleis A, Naylor D, Pablos-Mendez A, Reddy S, Scrimshaw S, Sepulveda J, Serwadda D, Zurayk H: Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 2010, 376(9756):1923-1958.
• [34]Beaglehole R, Bonita R: Public health at the crossroads: achievements and prospects. Cambridge, UK. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
• [35]Sim F, Lock K, McKee M: Maximizing the contribution of the public health workforce: the English experience. Bull WHO 2007, 85(12):935-940.
• [36]Evans D: ‘Taking public health out of the ghetto’: the policy and practice of multi-disciplinary public health in the United Kingdom. Soc Sci Med 2003, 57(6):959-967.
• [37]Griffiths S, Crown J, McEwen J: The role of the Faculty of Public Health (Medicine) in developing a multidisciplinary public health profession in the UK. Public Health 2007, 121(6):420-425.
• [38]WHO: South-East Asia Public Health Initiative. Report of the first meeting of the Strategic Advisory Group. New Delhi: WHO Project No: ICP OSD 001; 2005. 1–2 November 2004
• [39]Fineberg HV, Green GM, Ware JH, Anderson BL: Changing public health training needs: professional education and the paradigm of public health. Annu Rev Public Health 1994, 15:237-257.
• [40]Mokwena K, Mokgatle-Nthabu M, Madiba S, Lewis H, Ntuli-Ngcobo B: Training of public health workforce at the National School of Public Health: meeting Africa’s needs. Bull World Health Organ 2007, 85(12):949-954.
• [41]Obbadi M: The course of specialization in public health in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 1926 to 2006: lessons and challenges. Hum Resour Health 2010, 8:4. BioMed Central Full Text
• [42]Lim MK, Seow A, Wilder-Smith A, Lee HP: Graduate public health education–Singapore’s contribution to strengthening capacity in the region and beyond. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008, 37(12):1046-1050.
• [43]Beaglehole R, Dal Poz MR: Public health workforce: challenges and policy issues. Hum Resour Health 2003, 1:4. BioMed Central Full Text
• [44]Haté V, Gannon S: Center for S, International S: Public health in South Asia, A Report of the CSIS Global Health Policy Center. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies; 2010.
• [45]Chowdhury AMR: A new education program in Bangladesh. Boston: Presented at the 134th Annual Meeting and Exposition of American Public Health Association; 2006. November 4-8
• [46]TEMPUS T: Computer communication for international collaboration in education in public health. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1992, 670:43.
• [47]Edouard G, Dominique B, Moussiliou PN, Francis G, Khaled B, Serge B: E-Learning and North–south collaboration: the experience of two public health schools in France and Benin. Pan Afr Med J 2009, 3:5.
• [48]Lapp I: Experience from MPH programs in developing settings worldwide. Boston: Presented at the 134th Annual Meeting and Exposition of American Public Health Association; 2006. November 4–8
• [49]Jones R: Lessons learned in a European-Latin American collaboration for developing postgraduate education in public health. Eur J Public Health 2001, 11(2):227-239.
• [50]Voyi K: Producing a capable workforce. Bull World Health Organ 2007, 85(12):902-903.
• [51]Umble KE, Cervero RM, Yang B, Atkinson WL: Effects of traditional classroom and distance continuing education: a theory-driven evaluation of a vaccine-preventable diseases course. Am J Public Health 2000, 90(8):1218-1224.
• [52]Rose MA, Frisby AJ, Hamlin MD, Jones SS: Evaluation of the effectiveness of a Web-based graduate epidemiology course. Comput Nurs 2000, 18(4):162-167.
• [53]Bulgiba AM, Dahlui M: Developing global public health links in southeast Asia. Asia Pac J Public Health 2010, 22(3 Suppl):14S-18S.