期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Environmental Health Science Engineering
Removal of dichloromethane from waste gas streams using a hybrid bubble column/biofilter bioreactor
Reza Saeedi2  Shahrokh Nazmara4  Noushin Rastkari3  Nematollah Jaafarzadeh1  Ramin Nabizadeh4  Kamyar Yaghmaeian4  Alireza Mesdaghinia4  Kazem Naddafi4  Mehrnoosh Abtahi4 
[1] Environmental Technology Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran;Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Safety and Environment, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;Center for Air Pollution Research, Institute for Environmental Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health and Institute for Environmental Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 14155–6446, Tehran, Iran
关键词: Elimination capacity;    HBCB bioreactor;    Biofilter;    Bubble column bioreactor;    Waste gas streams;    Dichloromethane;   
Others  :  810629
DOI  :  10.1186/2052-336X-12-22
 received in 2013-03-01, accepted in 2013-11-19,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The performance of a hybrid bubble column/biofilter (HBCB) bioreactor for the removal of dichloromethane (DCM) from waste gas streams was studied in continuous mode for several months. The HBCB bioreactor consisted of two compartments: bubble column bioreactor removing DCM from liquid phase and biofilter removing DCM from gas phase. Effect of inlet DCM concentration on the elimination capacity was examined in the DCM concentration range of 34–359 ppm with loading rates ranged from 2.2 to 22.8 g/m3.h and constant total empty bed retention time (EBRT) of 200 s. In the equal loading rates, the elimination capacity and removal efficiency of the biofilter were higher than the corresponding values of the bubble column bioreactor. The maximum elimination capacity of the HBCB bioreactor was determined to be 15.7 g/m3.h occurred in the highest loading rate of 22.8 g/m3.h with removal efficiency of 69%. The overall mineralization portion of the HBCB bioreactor was in the range of 72-79%. The mixed liquor acidic pH especially below 5.5 inhibited microbial activity and decreased the elimination capacity. Inhibitory effect of high ionic strength was initiated in the mixed liquor electrical conductivity of 12.2 mS/cm. This study indicated that the HBCB bioreactor could benefit from advantages of both bubble column and biofilter reactors and could remove DCM from waste gas streams in a better manner.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Abtahi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140709045104356.pdf 685KB PDF download
Figure 6. 19KB Image download
Figure 5. 18KB Image download
Figure 4. 28KB Image download
Figure 3. 113KB Image download
Figure 2. 52KB Image download
Figure 1. 37KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment: Public health goal for dichloromethane (methylene chloride, DCM) in drinking water. California: California Environmental Protection Agency; 2000.
  • [2]Balasubramanian P, Philip L, Murty Bhallamudi S: Biodegradation of chlorinated and non-chlorinated VOCs from pharmaceutical industries. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2011, 163:497-518.
  • [3]Hartmans S, Tramper J: Dichloromethane removal from waste gases with a trickle-bed bioreactor. Bioproc Eng 1991, 6:83-92.
  • [4]Wang J, Chen J: Removal of dichloromethane from waste gases with a bio-contact oxidation reactor. Chem Eng J 2006, 123:103-107.
  • [5]Abtahi M, Naddafi K, Mesdaghinia A, Yaghmaeian K, Nabizadeh R, Jaafarzadeh N, Rastkari N, Saeedi R, Nazmara S: Dichloromethane emissions from automotive manufacturing industry in Iran: case study of the SAIPA automotive manufacturing company. Toxicol Environ chem 2013, 95:757-764.
  • [6]WHO: Air Quality Guidelines for Europe. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2000.
  • [7]WHO: Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
  • [8]Bailón L, Nikolausz M, Kästner M, Veiga MC, Kennes C: Removal of dichloromethane from waste gases in one- and two-liquid-phase stirred tank bioreactors and biotrickling filters. Water Res 2009, 43:11-20.
  • [9]Dehghanzadeh R, Aslani H, Torkian A, Asadi M: Interaction of acrylonitrile vapors on a bench scale biofilter treating styrene-polluted waste gas streams. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng 2011, 8(2):159-168.
  • [10]Lu C, Chang K, Hsu S: A model for treating toluene and acetone mixtures by a trickle-bed air biofilter. World J Microb Biot 2004, 20:185-192.
  • [11]Álvarez-Hornos FJ, Lafita C, Martínez-Soria V, Penya-Roja JM, Pérez MC, Gabaldón C: Evaluation of a pilot-scale biotrickling filter as a VOC control technology for the plastic coating sector. Biochem Eng J 2011, 58–59:154-161.
  • [12]Lebrero R, Rodrίguez E, Martin M, Garcίa-Encina PA, Muñoz R: H2S and VOCs abatement robustness in biofilters and air diffusion bioreactors: a comparative study. Water Res 2010, 44:3905-3914.
  • [13]Yang C, Chen H, Zeng G, Yu G, Luo S: Biomass accumulation and control strategies in gas biofiltration. Biotechnol Adv 2010, 28:531-540.
  • [14]Yeom SH, Yoo YJ: Removal of benzene in a hybrid bioreactor. Process Biochem 1999, 34:281-288.
  • [15]USEPA: USEPA Method 18: Measurement of gaseous organic compound emission by gas chromatography. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 1997.
  • [16]USEPA: USEPA Method 5021A: Volatile organic compounds in various sample matrices using equilibrium headspace analysis. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 2003.
  • [17]APHA: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington DC: American Public Health Association; 2005.
  • [18]Yu J, Cai W, Chen J, Feng L, Jiang Y, Cheng Z: Conversion characteristics and mechanism analysis of gaseous dichloromethane degraded by a VUV light in different reaction media. J Environ Sci 2012, 24(10):1777-1784.
  • [19]DeBest JH, Ultee J, Hage A, Doddema HJ, Janssen DB, Harder W: Dichloromethane utilization in a packed-bed reactor in the presence of various electron acceptors. Water Res 2000, 34(2):566-574.
  • [20]Freedman DL, Gossett JM: Biodegradation of dichloromethane and its utilization as a growth substrate under methanogenic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 1991, 57(10):2847-2857.
  • [21]Rittmann BE, McCarty PL: Environmental biotechnology: principles and applications. Boston, Massachusetts: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
  • [22]Ravi R, Philip L, Swaminathan T: Performance evaluation of a compost biofilter treating dichloromethane vapors. IJChER 2009, 1(2):63-67.
  • [23]Ergas SJ, Kinney K, Fuller ME, Scow KM: Characterization of a compost biofiltration system degrading dichloromethane. Biotechnol Bioeng 1994, 44:1048-1054.
  • [24]Saeedi R, Naddafi K, Nabizadeh R, Mesdaghinia A, Nasseri S, Alimohammadi M, Nazmara S: Denitrification of drinking water using a hybrid heterotrophic/autotrophic/BAC bioreactor. Desalin Water Treat 2012, 45:1-10.
  • [25]Jian-ming Y, Jian-meng C, Jia-de W: Removal of dichloromethane from waste gases by a biotrickling filter. J Environ Sci 2006, 18(6):1073-1076.
  • [26]Jianwei L, Junxi L, Lin L: Performance of two biofilters with neutral and low pH treating off-gases. J Environ Sci 2008, 20:1409-1414.
  • [27]Okkerse WJH, Ottengraf SPP, Osinga-Kuipers B, Okkerse M: Biomass accumulation and clogging in biotrickling filters for waste gas treatment. Evaluation of a dynamic model using dichloromethane as a model pollutant. Biotechnol Bioeng 1999, 63:418-430.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:86次 浏览次数:60次