期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Environmental Health Science Engineering
Performance evaluation of a scoria-compost biofilter treating xylene vapors
Fazel Mohammadi Moghadam4  Mohsen Heidari3  Bijan Bina1  Amir Rahimi2  Mohammad Mehdi Amin1 
[1] Student Research Center, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran;Chemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran;Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran;Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
关键词: Elimination capacity;    Compost;    Scoria;    Biofilter;    Xylene;   
Others  :  1175277
DOI  :  10.1186/s40201-014-0140-4
 received in 2014-03-13, accepted in 2014-11-11,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The removal of xylene vapors was studied in a biofilter packed with a new hybrid (scoria/compost) packing material at various inlet loads (IL) and empty bed residence times (EBRT) of 90, 60, and 40s. The best performance was observed for EBRT of 90s, where a removal efficiency of 98% was obtained under steady state condition for inlet xylene concentration of 1.34 g m−3, while a maximum elimination capacity of 97.5 g m−3 h−1 was observed for IL of 199.5 g m−3 h−1. Carbon dioxide production rates and the microbial counts for xylene-degraders followed xylene elimination capacities. Overall look to the results of this study indicates that the scoria/compost mixture could be considered as a potential biofilter carrier, with low pressure drop (here <4 mm H2O), to treat air streams containing VOCs.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Amin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150427100313641.pdf 1847KB PDF download
Figure 9. 18KB Image download
Figure 8. 93KB Image download
Figure 7. 67KB Image download
Figure 6. 13KB Image download
Figure 5. 21KB Image download
Figure 4. 13KB Image download
Figure 3. 18KB Image download
Figure 2. 31KB Image download
Figure 1. 47KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Saravanan V, Rajamohan N: Treatment of xylene polluted air using press mud-based biofilter. J Hazard Mater 2009, 162:981-988.
  • [2]ATSDR: Toxicological Profile Information Sheet. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, USA; 2003.
  • [3]Rene ER, Murthy DVS, Swaminathan T: Effect of flow rate, concentration and transient-state operations on the performance of a biofilter treating xylene vapors. Water Air Soil Pollut 2010, 211:79-93.
  • [4]Cox HHJ, Deshusses MA: Effect of starvation on the performance and re-acclimation of biotrickling filters for air pollution control. Environ Sci Technol 2002, 36:3069-3073.
  • [5]Dehghanzadeh R, Aslani H, Torkian A, Asadi M: Interaction of acrylonitrile vapors on a bench scale biofilter treating styrene-polluted waste gas streams. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng 2011, 8:159-168.
  • [6]Mehdinia SM, Abdul Latif P, Taghipour H: A comparative evaluation of dried activated sludge and mixed dried activated sludge with rice husk silica to remove hydrogen sulfide. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng 2013, 10:22. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [7]Hernández J, Prado ÓJ, Almarcha M, Lafuente J, Gabriel D: Development and application of a hybrid inert/organic packing material for the biofiltration of composting off-gases mimics. J Hazard Mater 2010, 178:665-672.
  • [8]Roshani B, Torkian A, Aslani H, Dehghanzadeh R: Bed mixing and leachate recycling strategies to overcome pressure drop buildup in the biofiltration of hydrogen sulfide. Bioresour Technol 2012, 109:26-30.
  • [9]Lee S, Li C, Heber AJ, Ni J, Huang H: Biofiltration of a mixture of ethylene, ammonia, n-butanol, and acetone gases. Bioresour Technol 2013, 127:366-377.
  • [10]Sun D, Li J, An T, Xu M, Sun G, Guo J: Evaluation of the performance of structured mixed packing and inert packing materials in toluene biotrickle-filtration. Biotechnol Bioproc Eng 2011, 16:1009-1018.
  • [11]Prado ÓJ, Veiga MC, Kennes C: Treatment of gas-phase methanol in conventional biofilters packed with lava rock. Water Res 2005, 39:2385-2393.
  • [12]Detchanamurthy S, Gostomski PA: Biofiltration for treating VOCs: an overview. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 2012, 11:231-241.
  • [13]Strauss JM, Riedel KJ, Plessis CA: Mesophilic and thermophilic BTEX substrate interactions for a toluene-acclimatized biofilter. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2004, 64:855-861.
  • [14]Gabaldón C, Martínez-Soria V, Martín M, Marzal P, Penya-roja JP, Alvarez-Hornos FJ: Removal of TEX vapours from air in a peat biofilter: influence of inlet concentration and inlet load. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2006, 81:322-328.
  • [15]Gallastegui G, Ramirez AÁ, Elías A, Jones JP, Heitz M: Performance and macrokinetic analysis of biofiltration of toluene and p-xylene mixtures in a conventional biofilter packed with inert material. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:7657-7665.
  • [16]Mathur AK, Balomajumder C: Rahul: Biological treatment and modeling aspect of BTEX abatement process in a biofilter. Bioresour Technol 2013, 142:9-17.
  • [17]Kwon JS, Yun ST, Lee JH, Kim SO, Jo HY: Removal of divalent heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn) and arsenic (III) from aqueous solutions using scoria: kinetics and equilibria of sorption. J Hazard Mater 2010, 174:307-313.
  • [18]Lodge JP: Methods of Air Sampling and Analysis. Lewis Publishing Inc, New York; 1989.
  • [19]Jorio H, Payre G, Heitz M: Mathematic modeling of gas-phase biofilter performance. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2003, 78:834-846.
  • [20]Hwang JW, Jang SJ, Lee EY, Choi CY, Park S: Evaluation of composts as biofilter packing material for treatment of gaseous p-xylene. Biochem Eng J 2007, 35:142-149.
  • [21]Jorio H, Jin Y, Elmrini H, Nikiema J, Brzezinski R, Heitz M: Treatment of VOCs in biofilters inoculated with fungi and microbial consortium. Environ Technol 2009, 30:477-485.
  • [22]Rene ER, Mohammad BT, Veiga MC, Kennes C: Biodegradation of BTEX in a fungal biofilter: influence of operational parameters, effect of shock-loads and substrate stratification. Bioresour Technol 2012, 116:204-213.
  • [23]Jorio H, Bibeau L, Viel G, Heitz M: Effects of gas flow rate and inlet concentration on xylene vapors biofiltration performance. Chem Eng J 2000, 76:209-221.
  • [24]Gallastegui G, Muñoz R, Barona A, Ibarra-Berastegi G, Rojo N, Elías A: Evaluating the impact of water supply strategies on p-xylene biodegradation performance in an organic media-based biofilter. J Hazard Mater 2011, 185:1019-1026.
  • [25]Znad HT, Katoh H, Kawase Y: High loading toluene treatment in a compost based biofilter using up-flow and down-flow swing operation. J Hazard Mater 2007, 141:745-752.
  • [26]Wu D, Quan X, Zhao Y, Chen S: Removal of p-xylene from an air stream in a hybrid biofilter. J Hazard Mater 2006, B136:288-295.
  • [27]Li L, Liu JX: Removal of xylene from off-gas using a bioreactor containing bacteria and fungi. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2006, 58:60-64.
  • [28]Kong X, Wang C, Ji M: Analysis of microbial metabolic characteristics in mesophilic and thermophilic biofilters using Biolog plate technique. Chem Eng J 2013, 230:415-421.
  • [29]Rene ER, Veiga M, Kennes C: Performance of a biofilter for the removal of high concentrations of styrene under steady and non-steady state conditions. J Hazard Mater 2009, 168:282-290.
  • [30]Dorado AD, Baeza JA, Lafuente J, Gabriel D, Gamisans X: Biomass accumulation in a biofilter treating toluene at high loads-Part 1: experimental performance from inoculation to clogging. Chem Eng J 2012, 209:661-669.
  • [31]Estrada JM, Hernández S, Muñoz R, Revah S: A comparative study of fungal and bacterial biofiltration treating a VOC mixture. J Hazard Mater 2013, 250–251:190-197.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:57次 浏览次数:31次