Economic analysis of participation in physical activity in England: implications for health policy

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Julia Fox-Rushby¹  Subhash Pokhrel¹  Nana Kwame Anokye¹ 

[1] Health Economics Research Group (HERG), Brunel University London, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, London, UK

关键词: Demand;    Participation;    Money;    Time;    Prices;    Physical activity;   

Others  :  1136196
DOI  :  10.1186/s12966-014-0117-9

 received in 2014-05-09, accepted in 2014-09-08,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Changing the relative price of (in) activity is an important tool for health policies. Nonetheless, to date, analyses of correlates of physical activity (PA) have excluded the notion of price. Using the first nationwide dataset on prices of PA for England, we explore for the first time how money and time prices are associated with PA (in general) and specific activities.

Methods

A nationally representative telephone follow-up survey to Health Survey for England (HSE) 2008 was undertaken in 2010. The sample covered individuals who reported to have undertaken some PA in the HSE 2008. Questions focussed on: ex-post money and time prices; type and quantity of PA; perceived benefits of PA and socio-economic details. Count regression models (all activities together, and swimming, workout, walking separately) were fitted to investigate the variation in quantity of PA.

Results

Of 1683 respondents, 83% participated in PA (one or more activities), and spent an average of £2.40 per occasion of participation in PA and 23 minutes travelling. Participation in PA was negatively associated with money prices per occasion (i.e. family member/child care fees, parking fees, and facility charges) and travel time price. Participation in PA was more sensitive to travel time price than money price. Among the specific activities, the money price effect was highest for swimming with a 10% higher price associated with 29% fewer occasions of swimming; followed by workout (3% fewer occasions) and walking (2% fewer occasions). Only swimming and workout were sensitive to travel time price. People who felt doing PA could help them ‘get outdoors’, ‘have fun’, or ‘lose weight’ were likely to do more PA.

Conclusions

Two main policy implications emerge from the findings. First, the results support the notion that positive financial incentives, e.g. subsidising price of participation, could generally lead to an increase in quantity of PA among those already exercising. Second, such policies could lead to desired policy goals if implemented at an individual activity level (e.g. 50% subsidy on swimming entrance charges) rather than a blanket implementation (e.g. subsidising average entrance charges across all activities by 50%).

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Anokye et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Koeneman MA, Verheijden MW, Chinapaw MJM, Hopman-Rock M: Determinants of physical activity and exercise in healthy older adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8:142. BioMed Central Full Text
• [2]Uijtdewilligen L, Nauta J, Singh AS, Mechelen VW, Twisk JWR, Horst KVD, Chinapaw MJM: Determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in young people: a review and quality synthesis of prospective studies. Br J Sports Med 2011, 45:896-905.
• [3]Strawinski P: Economic determinants of sport participation in Poland. Rivista di Diritto ed Economia Dello Sport 2010, 3:55-76.
• [4]Faulkner GEJ, Grootendoorst P, Nguyen VH, Andreyeva T, Arbour-Nicitopoulos K, Auld MC, Cash SB, Cawley J, Donnely P, Drewnowski A, Dube L, Ferrence R, Janssen I, LaFrance J, Lakdawall D, Mendelsen R, Powell LM, Traill BW, Windmeijer F: Economic instruments for obesity prevention: results of a scoping review and modified Delphi survey. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8:109. BioMed Central Full Text
• [5]Shemilt I, Hollands GJ, Marteau TM, Nakamura R, Jebb SA, Kelly MP, Suhtcke M, Oglivie D: Economic instruments for population diet and physical activity behaviour change: a systematic scoping review. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(9):e75070.
• [6]Spence JC, Holt NL, Dutove JK, Carson V: Uptake and effectiveness of the children’s fitness tax credit in Canada: the rich get richer. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:356. BioMed Central Full Text
• [7]Von Tigerstrom B, Larre T, Sauder J: Using the tax system to promote physical activity: critical analysis of Canadian initiatives. Am J Public Health 2011, 101:8. e10-6. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300201
• [8]Andreyeva T, Long MW, Brownel KD: The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. Am J Public Health 2010, 100(2):216-222.
• [9]Breuer C, Hallmann K, Wicker P, Feiler S: Socio-economic patterns of sport demand and ageing. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 2010, 7:61-70.
• [10]Lera-López F, Rapún-Gárate M: The demand for sport: sport consumption and participation models. J Sport Management 2007, 21:103-122.
• [11]Downward P, Dawson A, Dejonghe T: Sports Economics: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Elsevier Ltd, US; 2009.
• [12]Sturm R: The economics of physical activity: societal trends and rationales for intervention. Am J Prev Med 2004, 27(3S):126-135.
• [13]Cawley J: An economic framework for understanding physical activity and eating behaviours. Am J Prev Med 2004, 27(3S):117-125.
• [14]Taks M: Consumer expenses in sport: a marketing tool for sports and sports facility providers? Eur J Sport Management 1999, 6(1):4-18.
• [15]Humphreys BR, Ruseski JE: Participation in physical activity and government spending on parks and recreation. Contemp Econ Policy 2007, 25(4):538-552.
• [16]Anokye N, Pokhrel S, Buxton M, Fox-Rushby J: The demand for sports and exercise: results from an illustrative survey. Eur J Health Econ 2012, 13:277-287.
• [17]Brown H, Roberts J: Exercising choice: the economic determinants of physical activity behaviour. Soc Sci Med 2011, 73(3):383-390.
• [18]Humphreys BR, Ruseski JE: Economic determinants of participation in physical activity and sport.IASE Working Paper No. 06–13 2006.
• [19]Coalter F: Reference pricing: changing perceptions of entrance charges for sport and recreation. Manag Leis 2004, 9(2):73-86.
• [20]Tai SS, Gould M, Smith P, Iliffe S: Promoting physical activity in general practice: should prescribed exercise be free? J Roy Soc Med 1999, 92(2):65-67.
• [21]PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on Evaluation of the impact of free swimming: Year 1 report – main report. London; 2010.
• [22]McInnes MM, Shinogle JA: Physical Activity: Economic and Policy Factors. In Economic Aspects of Obesity. Edited by Grossman M, Mocan N. University of Chicago Press, Chicago; 2011:249-283.
• [23]Humphreys BR, Ruseski JE: The economic choice of participation and time spent in physical activity and sport in Canada.Working Paper No. 2010–14 2010.
• [24]Downward P: Exploring the economic choice to participate in sport: results from the 2002 General Household Survey. Int Rev Appl Econ 2007, 21(5):633-653.
• [25]Lera-López F, Rapún-Gárate M: Sports participation versus consumer expenditure on sport: different determinants and strategies in sports management. Eur Sport Manag Q 2005, 5(2):167-186.
• [26]Farrell L, Shields MA: Investigating the economic and demographic determinants of sporting participation in England. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 2002, 165(2):335-348.
• [27]British Heart Foundation National Centre on A toolkit for the design, implementation and evaluation of exercise referral schemes: guidance for referring health professionals, exercise referral professionals and exercise referral scheme commissioners: Report. London; 2009.
• [28]DellaVigna S, Malmendier U: Paying not to go to the gym. Am Econ Rev 2006, 96(3):694-719.
• [29]Deaton A: Estimations of own-and cross-price elasticities from household survey data. J Econ 1987, 36:7-30.
• [30]Deaton A: Price elasticities from survey data: extensions and Indonesian results. J Econ 1990, 44:281-309.
• [31]Cadman J, Dineen C: Price and Income Elasticity of Demand for Broadband Subscriptions: a Cross-Sectional of OECD Countries. 2008.
• [32]Goldman F, Grossman M: The demand for paediatric care: a hedonic approach. J Polit Econ 1978, 86(2):259-280.
• [33]Cox T, Wohlgenant M: Price and quality effects in cross-sectional demand analysis. Am J Prev Med 1986, 68(4):908-919.
• [34]Kim S, Crompton JL: The influence of selected behavioural and economic variables on perceptions of admission price levels. J Travel Res 2002, 41:144-152.
• [35]Oliver A: Is nudge an effective public health strategy to tackle obesity? Yes.BMJ 2011, 342. doi:10.1136/bmj.d2168.
• [36]Rayner G: Is nudge an effective public health strategy to tackle obesity? No.BMJ 2011, 342. doi:10.1136/bmj.d2177.
• [37]Cassidy J: Lobby watch: the cabinet office behavioural insights team. BMJ 2011, 342:d1648.
• [38]Local Government Association on Changing behaviours in public health – to nudge or to shove?: Annual Report. London; 2013.
• [39]Hunter RF, Davis M, Tully MA, Kee F: The Physical Activity Loyalty Card Scheme: Development and Application of a Novel System for Incentivizing Behaviour Change. In Proceedings of Electronic Healthcare: 4th International Conference: 21–23 November 2011; Málaga, Spain Edited by Kostkova P, Szomszor M. 2012, 170-177.
• [40]Charness G, Gneezy U: Incentives to exercise. Econometrica 2009, 77(3):909-931.