期刊论文详细信息
BMC Veterinary Research
Epidemiology of Brucella infection in the human, livestock and wildlife interface in the Katavi-Rukwa ecosystem, Tanzania
Rudovick R. Kazwala1  Joseph J. Malakalinga1  Shabani K. Muller1  Lucas E. Matemba2  Justine A. Assenga1 
[1] Department of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania;National Institute for Medical Research, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
关键词: PCR;    c-ELISA;    RBPT;    Epidemiology;    Interface;    Ecosystem;    Brucella;   
Others  :  1224383
DOI  :  10.1186/s12917-015-0504-8
 received in 2015-04-16, accepted in 2015-07-23,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Brucellosis is a zoonosis of public health importance worldwide. In Tanzania, the disease is underreported due to insufficient awareness, inadequate diagnostic protocols, including lack of appropriate reagents for diagnosis. Livestock and wildlife are considered potential sources of infection to humans; however, the role played by these carriers in the epidemiology of the disease in the ecosystems in Tanzania is not fully understood. The objective of this study was to establish the prevalence of anti-Brucella antibodies in humans, wildlife and livestock; and molecular prevalence of Brucella spp in cattle and goats in the Katavi- Rukwa ecosystem.

Results

Anti-Brucella antibodies were detected in humans at 0.6 % (95 % CI: 0.1, 2.1 %); cattle at 6.8 % (95 % CI: 5.4, 8.5 %), goats at 1.6 % (95 % CI: 0.4, 4.1 %) and buffaloes at 7.9 % (95 % CI: 1.7, 21.4 %). One of the two sampled lions tested positive. Cattle had a significantly higher prevalence of anti-Brucella antibodies as compared to goats (P < 0.05). A significantly higher seroprevalence was found in female than in male cattle and in adult than in young cattle (P < 0.05). There was an agreement of 95 and 89 % in cattle and goats, respectively, for the Rose Bengal plate Test (RBPT) and Competitive Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (c-ELISA) in detecting Brucella infection. Eight (3.5 %) out of 231 milk samples tested were positive for Brucella spp on Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), and Brucella abortus biovar 1 was detected in cattle milk. However, no Brucella spp were detected in goat milk.

Conclusion

This study has shown the presence of anti- Brucella antibodies in humans, livestock, and wildlife in the Katavi- Rukwa ecosystem. Transmission of the infection between wildlife, livestock and humans is likely to continue due to increasing human activities in the human wildlife interface. This information is an important contribution to public health policy development in the human wildlife interface of the Katavi- Rukwa ecosystem.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Assenga et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150909110528189.pdf 835KB PDF download
Fig. 3. 82KB Image download
Fig. 2. 8KB Image download
Fig. 1. 9KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Office International des Epizooties (OIE). Bovine Brucellosis. In: World assembly of delegates of the OIE Chapter 2.4.3. OIE Terrestrial Manual;OIE, Paris. 2009. pp 1–35.
  • [2]Mangen MJ, Otte J, Pfeiffer D, Chilonda P. Bovine brucellosis in Sub-Saharan Africa: Estimation of seroprevalence and impact on meat and milk offtake potential. In: Livestock Policy Discussion Paper No. 8. Food and Agriculture Organization, Livestock Information and Policy Branch, AGAL; 2002. Available: www.fao.org/3/a-ag274e.pdf. Accessed: 02 June 2015.
  • [3]Makita K, Fèvre EM, Waiswa C, Eisler MC, Thrusfield M, Welburn SC. Herd prevalence of bovine brucellosis and analysis of risk factors in cattle in urban and peri-urban areas of the Kampala economic zone, Uganda. BMC Vet Res. 2011; 7(1):60. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [4]World Health organization (WHO). Brucellosis in humans and animals. 2O Avenue Appia, l2ll Geneva 27, Switzerland: WHO; 2006. Available: www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/Brucellosis.pdf. Accessed: 02 June 2015.
  • [5]Godfroid J. Brucellosis in wildlife. Rev Sci Off Int Epiz. 2002; 21:277-86.
  • [6]Fyumagwa RD, Wambura PN, Mellau LSB, Hoare R. Seroprevalence of Brucella abortus in buffaloes and wildebeests in the Serengeti ecosystem: A threat to humans and domestic ruminants. Tanzan Vet J. 2009; 26(2):62-7.
  • [7]Schelling E, Diguimbaye C, Daoud S, Nicolet J, Boerlin P, Tanner M, Zinsstag J. Brucellosis and Q-fever seroprevalences of nomadic pastoralists and their livestock in Chad. Prev Vet Med. 2003; 61:279-93.
  • [8]Dinka H, Chala R. Seroprevalence study of bovine brucellosis in Pastoral and Agro-Pastoral Areas of East Showa Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci. 2009; 6(5):508-12.
  • [9]Faye B, Castel V, Lesnoff M, Rutabinda D, Dhalwa J. Tuberculosis and brucellosis prevalence survey on dairy cattle in Mbarara milk basin (Uganda). Prev Vet Med. 2005; 67:267-281.
  • [10]McDermott JJ, Arimi SM. Brucellosis in Sub-Saharan Africa: epidemiology, control and impact. Vet Microbiol. 2002; 90:111-34.
  • [11]Muma JB, Samui KL, Oloya J, Munyeme M, Skjerve E. Risk factors for brucellosis in indigenous cattle reared in livestock-wildlife interface areas of Zambia. Prev Vet Med. 2007; 80:306-17.
  • [12]Mahlau EA. Further brucellosis surveys in Tanzania. Bull Epizoot Dis Afr. 1967; 15:373-8.
  • [13]Lymo BE. Prevalence of bovine brucellosis in small holder dairy farms in Morogoro municipality, Tanzania. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania; 2013.
  • [14]Otaru MMM. Potential zoonotic diseases in the southern zone of Tanzania. Proceedings of the 3rd Tanzania Veterinary Association Scientific Conference Arusha Tanzania. 1985.367-98.
  • [15]Jiwa SF, Kazwala RR, Tungaraza R, Kimera SI, Kalaye WJ. Bovine Brucellosis serum agglutination test, prevalence and breed disposition according to prevalent management systems in the Lake Victoria zone of Tanzania. Prev Vet Med. 1996; 26(3–4):341-6.
  • [16]Weinhäupl I, Schöpf KC, Khaschabi D, Kapaga AM, Msami HM. Investigations on the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis and brucellosis in dairy cattle in Dar es salaam Region and in zebu cattle in Lugoba area, Tanzania. Trop Anim Health Pro. 2000; 32:147-54.
  • [17]Swai ES, Mshanga D, Sanka NP, Marandu NH. Prevalence of bovine brucellosis in smallholder dairy farming area, Moshi, Tanzania. Bull Anim Health Prod Afr. 2005; 53:97-105.
  • [18]Kanuya NL, Matiko MK, Kessy BM, Mgongo FO, Ropstad E, Reksen O. A study on reproductive performance and related factors of zebu cows in pastoral herds in a semi-arid area of Tanzania. Theriogenology. 2006; 65(9):1859-74.
  • [19]Karimuribo ED, Ngowi HA, Swai ES, Kambarage DM. Prevalence of brucellosis in crossbred and indigenous cattle in Tanzania. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2007; 19:10.
  • [20]Kiputa VPS, Kimera SI, Wambura PN. Studies on the role of trade cattle in the transmission of brucellosis in Karagwe district, Tanzania. Tanzan Vet J. 2008; 25(1):48-59.
  • [21]Swai E, Schoonman L. A survey of zoonotic diseases in trade cattle slaughtered at Tanga city abattoir: A cause of public health concern. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012; 2(1):55-60.
  • [22]Minga UM, Balemba OB. ELISA, A new sero-diagnosis test for brucellosis in Tanzania. In Proceedings of the 18th Tanzania Veterinary Association Scientific Conference. Arusha, Tanzania: 1990; pp. 105–111.
  • [23]Swai ES, Schoonman L. The use of rose bengal plate test to asses cattle exposure to Brucella infection in traditional and smallholder dairy production systems of Tanga region of Tanzania. Vet Med Int. 2010. doi:10.4061/2010/837950.
  • [24]Temba PB. Seroprevalence of Brucella species infection and associated risk factors in Wildlife-livestock interface. A case study of Mikumi-selous Ecosystem. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania; 2012.
  • [25]Mtui- Malamsha N. Epidemiology study of brucellosis in humans and animals in Babati and Hanang districts of Tanzania. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania; 2001.
  • [26]Minja KSG. Prevalence of Brucellosis in Indigenous cattle: Implication for Human occupation Groups in Hanang and Babati districts of Tanzania. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania; 2002.
  • [27]Shirima GM. The epidemiology of brucellosis in animals and humans in Arusha and Manyara regions of Tanzania. PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow; Tanzania veterinary Association. 2005. p. 257.Available:http://theses.gla.ac.uk/4826. Accessed: 4  June 2015
  • [28]Swai ES, Schoonman L. Human Brucellosis: Seroprevalence and risk factors related to high risk occupational groups in Tanga municipality, Tanzania. Zoonoses Public Health. 2009; 56:183-7.
  • [29]Biggs HM, Bui DM, Galloway RL, Stoddard RA, Shadomy SV, Morrissey AB, Bartlett JA, Onyango JJ, Maro VP, Kinabo GD, Saganda W, Crump JA. Leptospirosis among Hospitalized Febrile Patients in Northern Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011; 85(2):275-81.
  • [30]James LW. The epidemiology of Human Brucellosis in Eastern (Morogoro), Tanzania. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania; 2012.
  • [31]Megersa B, Biffa D, Abunna F, Regassa A, Godfroid J, Skjerve E. Seroprevalence of brucellosis and its contribution to abortion in cattle, camel, and goat kept under pastoral management in Borana, Ethiopia. Tropl Anim Health Prod. 2011; 43(3):651-6.
  • [32]Cadmus SIB, Ijabone IF, Oputa HE, Adesoken HK, Stack JA. Serological survey of brucellosis in livestock animals and workers in Ibadan Nigeria. Afr J Biomed Res. 2006; 9:163-8.
  • [33]Mokhtar MO, Abdelhamid AA, Sarah MAA, Abbas MA. Survey of brucellosis among sheep, goats, cattle and camel in Kassala area, Eastern Sudan. J Anim Vet Adv. 2007; 6:635-7.
  • [34]McDermott J, Grace D, Zinsstag J. Economics of brucellosis impact and control in low-income countries. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz. 2013; 32(1):249-61.
  • [35]Shafee M, Rabbani M, Ahmad MUD, Muhammad K, Sheikh AA, Awan MA, Shabbir MZ. Seroprevalence of bovine brucellosis using indirect ELISA in Quetta Balochistan, Pakistan. J Anim Plant Sci. 2012; 22(3):125-7.
  • [36]Mai HM, Irons PC, Kabir J, Thompson PN. A large seroprevalence survey of brucellosis in cattle herds under diverse production systems in northern Nigeria. BMC Vet Res. 2012; 8(1):144. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [37]Treanor JJ, Geremia C, Crowley PH, Cox JJ, White PJ, Wallen RL, Blanton DW. Estimating probabilities of active brucellosis infection in Yellowstone bison through quantitative serology and tissue culture. J Appl Ecol. 2011; 48:1324-32.
  • [38]Mellau LSB, Kuya SL, Wambura PN. Seroprevalence of brucellosis in domestic ruminants in livestock-wildlife interface: A case study of Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Arusha, Tanzania. Tanzan Vet J. 2009; 26(1):44-50.
  • [39]Walker L. Veterinary Microbiology. In: Veterinary Microbiology. Dwright CH, Chunge ZY, editors. Massachusetts, Black Wells Science.; 1999: p.196-203.
  • [40]Kassiri H, Amani H, Lotfi M. Epidemiological, laboratory, diagnostic and public health aspects of human brucellosis in western Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2013; 3:589-94.
  • [41]Alexander KA, Blackburn JK, Vandewalle ME, Pesapane R, Baipoledi EK, Elzer PH. Buffalo, Bush Meat, and the Zoonotic Threat of Brucellosis in Botswana. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e32842.
  • [42]Gorsich EE, Ezenwa VO, Cross PC, Bengis RG, Jolles AE. Context-dependent survival, fecundity and predicted population-level consequences of brucellosis in African buffalo. J Anim Ecol. 2015; 84(4):999-1009.
  • [43]Nielsen K, Smith P, Widdison J, Gall D, Kelly L, Kelly W, Nicoletti P. Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O: 9 and Escherichia coli O157: H7. Vet Microbiol. 2004; 100:25-30.
  • [44]Montasser A, Affi M, El-Bayoumy E, Abdul-Raouf U, Mohamad H. Efficiency of serological tests for detection of brucellosis in ruminant at south provinces of. Egypt. Glob Vet. 2011; 6:156-61.
  • [45]Biancifiori F, Garrido F, Nielsen K, Moscati L, Durán M, Gall D. Assessment of a monoclonal antibody-based competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) for diagnosis of brucellosis in infected and Rev. 1 vaccinated sheep and goats. New Microbiol. 2000; 23:399-406.
  • [46]McGiven JA, Tucker JD, Perret LL, Stack JA, Brew SD, MacMillan AP. Validation of FPA and cELISA for the detection of antibodies to Brucella abortus in cattle sera and comparison to SAT, CFT, and iELISA. J Immunol Methods. 2003; 278:171-8.
  • [47]Nielsen K, Ewalt DR. Bovine brucellosis. In: Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. OIE, Paris; 2008: p.642-60.
  • [48]Abd Al-Azeem MW, Elmalt LM, El Abdein AEZ, Sayed HH. Molecular and Serological Studies on Detection of Brucella Species in Cattle and Buffaloes. J Pharm Biomed Sci. 2012; 2(3):16-24.
  • [49]Xavier MN. Pathology, immunohistochemistry and bacteriology of tissue and milk of cows and fetuses experimentally infected with Brucella abortus. J Comp Pathol. 2009; 140(3):149-57.
  • [50]Mgawe P, Borgerhoff Mulder M, Caro T, Martin A, Kiffner C. Factors affecting bushmeat consumption in the Katavi-Rukwa ecosystem of Tanzania. Trop Conserv Sci. 2012; 5(4):446-62.
  • [51]Caro TM. Abundance and distribution of mammals in Katavi National Park, Tanzania. Afr J Eco. 1999; 37:305-13.
  • [52]Thursfield M. Diagnostic testing. In: Veterinary epidemiology. 2nd ed. Thursfield M, editor. Blackwell Science Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom.; 1995: p.483.
  • [53]Mugizi DR, Muradrasoli S, Boqvist S, Erume J, Nasinyama GW, Waiswa C, et al. Isolation and Molecular Characterization of Brucella Isolates in Cattle Milk in Uganda. BioMed Res Int. 2015. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/720413. Accessed 23/06/2015.
  • [54]Otte MJ, Gumm ID. Intra-cluster correlation coefficients of 20 infections calculated from the results of cluster-sample surveys. Prev Vet Med. 1997; 1:147-50.
  • [55]Bennett S, Woods T, Liyanage WM, Smith DL. A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries. World Health Stat Q. 1991; 44(3):98-106.
  • [56]Etman RH, Barsoum SA, Ibrahim IGA, El-Ashmawy WR, Abou-Gazia KA. Evaluation of efficacy of some serological tests used for diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle in Egypt using latent class analysis. Sokoto J Vet Sci. 2014; 12(2):1-7.
  • [57]Alton GG, Jones LM, Verger JM, Angus RD. Techniques for the brucellosis laboratory. Institute National de la recherche’ Agronomique (INRA) Publications, Paris, France; 1988.
  • [58]Nicoletti PN. Further evaluation of serologic procedures used to diagnose brucellosis. Am J Vet Res. 1969; 30:1811-6.
  • [59]Huber J, Nicoletti P. Comparison of the results of Card, Rivanol, Complement Fixation and Milk ring test with the isolation rate of Brucella abortus from cattle. Am J Vet Res. 1986; 47:1529-31.
  • [60]Bricker BJ, Halling SM. Differentiation of Brucella abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4, Brucella melitensis, Brucella ovis, and Brucella suis bv. 1 by PCR. J Cin Microbiol. 1994; 32:2660-6.
  • [61]Anonymous. Tanzania Animal Welfare Act. 2008. Available: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/animalwelfare/tanzania.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2015.
  • [62]Anonymous. Guidelines to promote the well being of animal used for scientific purposes. 2008. Available: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/ea18.pdf. Accessed: 4 June 2015.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:22次 浏览次数:11次