Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound | |
Feasibility of volumetric MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) for painful bone metastases | |
Maurice A van den Bosch2  Marco van Vulpen3  Helena M Verkooijen2  Floor M Knuttel2  Chrit T Moonen1  Robbert J Nijenhuis2  Lambertus W Bartels1  Mie K Lam1  Merel Huisman2  | |
[1] Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands;Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands;Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands | |
关键词: Feasibility; Oncology; Palliative treatment; Bone metastases; Magnetic resonance imaging; Focused ultrasound; | |
Others : 1132947 DOI : 10.1186/2050-5736-2-16 |
|
received in 2014-06-13, accepted in 2014-08-25, 发布年份 2014 | |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) has recently emerged as an effective treatment option for painful bone metastases. We describe here the first experience with volumetric MR-HIFU for palliative treatment of painful bone metastases and evaluate the technique on three levels: technical feasibility, safety, and initial effectiveness.
Methods
In this observational cohort study, 11 consecutive patients (7 male and 4 female; median age, 60 years; age range, 53–86 years) underwent 13 treatments for 12 bone metastases. All patients exhibited persistent metastatic bone pain refractory to the standard of care. Patients were asked to rate their worst pain on an 11-point pain scale before treatment, 3 days after treatment, and 1 month after treatment. Complications were monitored. All data were prospectively recorded in the context of routine clinical care. Response was defined as a ≥2-point decrease in pain at the treated site without increase in analgesic intake. Baseline pain scores were compared to pain scores at 3 days and 1 month using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For reporting, the STROBE guidelines were followed.
Results
No treatment-related major adverse events were observed. At 3 days after volumetric MR-HIFU ablation, pain scores decreased significantly (p = 0.045) and response was observed in a 6/11 (55%) patients. At 1-month follow-up, which was available for nine patients, pain scores decreased significantly compared to baseline (p = 0.028) and 6/9 patients obtained pain response (overall response rate 67% (95% confidence interval (CI) 35%–88%)).
Conclusions
This is the first study reporting on the volumetric MR-HIFU ablation for painful bone metastases. No major treatment-related adverse events were observed during follow-up. The results of our study showed that volumetric MR-HIFU ablation for painful bone metastases is technically feasible and can induce pain relief in patients with metastatic bone pain refractory to the standard of care. Future research should be aimed at standardization of the treatment procedures and treatment of larger numbers of patients to assess treatment effectiveness and comparison to the standard of care.
【 授权许可】
2014 Huisman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20150304100012756.pdf | 1078KB | download | |
Figure 4. | 45KB | Image | download |
Figure 3. | 62KB | Image | download |
Figure 2. | 111KB | Image | download |
Figure 1. | 57KB | Image | download |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]van der Linden YM, Hoskin P: Bone Metastases. In Re-Irradiation: New Frontiers. Medical Radiology; Radiation Oncology. Edited by Nieder C, Langendijk JA. Berlin: Springer; 2011:191-204.
- [2]Ratanatharathorn V, Powers WE, Temple HT: Palliation of Bone Metastases. In Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology. Edited by Perez CA, Brady LW, Halperin EC. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:2385-2404.
- [3]Mercadante S: Malignant bone pain: pathophysiology and treatment. Pain 1997, 69(1–2):1-18.
- [4]Lutz S, Berk L, Chang E, Chow E, Hahn C, Hoskin P, Howell D, Konski A, Kachnic L, Lo S, Sahgal A, Silverman L, von Gunten C, Mendel E, Vassil A, Bruner DW, Hartsell W, American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO): Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011, 79(4):965-976. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.026
- [5]Chow E, Zeng L, Salvo N, Dennis K, Tsao M, Lutz S: Update on the systematic review of palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012, 24(2):112-124. doi:10.1016/j.clon.2011.11.004
- [6]Steenland E, Leer JW, van Houwelingen H, Post WJ, van den Hout WB, Kievit J, de Haes H, Martijn H, Oei B, Vonk E, van der Steen-Banasik E, Wiggenraad RG, Hoogenhout J, Wárlám-Rodenhuis C, van Tienhoven G, Wanders R, Pomp J, van Reijn M, van Mierlo I, Rutten E: The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: a global analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study. Radiother Oncol 1999, 52(2):101-109.
- [7]Huisman M, van den Bosch MA, Wijlemans JW, van Vulpen M, van der Linden YM, Verkooijen HM: Effectiveness of reirradiation for painful bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012, 84(1):8-14. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.080
- [8]Wong E, Hoskin P, Bedard G, Poon M, Zeng L, Lam H, Vulpe H, Tsao M, Pulenzas N, Chow E: Re-irradiation for painful bone metastases - a systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2014, 110(1):61-70. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2013.09.004
- [9]Chow E, van der Linden YM, Roos D, Hartsell WF, Hoskin P, Wu JS, Brundage MD, Nabid A, Tissing-Tan CJA, Oei B, Babington S, Demas WF, Wilson CF, Meyer RM, Chen BE, Wong RKS: Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2014, 15(2):164-171. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70556-4
- [10]Tempany CM, McDannold NJ, Hynynen K, Jolesz FA: Focused ultrasound surgery in oncology: overview and principles. Radiology 2011, 259(1):39-56. doi:10.1148/radiol.11100155
- [11]Jolesz FA, Hynynen K: Magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Cancer J 2002, 8(Suppl 1):S100–12-S100-S12.
- [12]Napoli A, Anzidei M, Ciolina F, Marotta E, Cavallo Marincola B, Brachetti G, Di Mare L, Cartocci G, Boni F, Noce V, Bertaccini L, Catalano C: MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound: current status of an emerging technology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013, 36(5):1190-1203. doi:10.1007/s00270-013-0592-4
- [13]Tyshlek D, Aubry J-F, ter Haar G, Hananel A, Foley J, Eames M, Kassell N, Simonin HH: Focused ultrasound development and clinical adoption: 2013 update on the growth of the field. J Ther Ultrasound 2014, 2(1):2. doi:10.1186/2050-5736-2-2 BioMed Central Full Text
- [14]Moonen CT, Quesson B, Salomir R, Vimeux FC, de Zwart JA, van Vaals JJ, Grenier N, Palussière J: Thermal therapies in interventional MR imaging. Focused ultrasound. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2001, 11(4):737-747. Xi
- [15]Hynynen K, Freund WR, Cline HE, Chung AH, Watkins RD, Vetro JP, Jolesz FA: A clinical, noninvasive, MR imaging-monitored ultrasound surgery method. Radiographics 1996, 16(1):185-195. doi:10.1148/radiographics.16.1.185
- [16]Ishihara Y, Calderon A, Watanabe H, Okamoto K, Suzuki Y, Kuroda K: A precise and fast temperature mapping using water proton chemical shift. Magn ResonMed 1995, 34(6):814-823.
- [17]Ikink ME, Voogt MJ, Verkooijen HM, Lohle PN, Schweitzer KJ, Franx A, Mali WP, Bartels LW, van den Bosch MA: Mid-term clinical efficacy of a volumetric magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound technique for treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Eur Radiol 2013. doi:10.1007/s00330-013-2915-x
- [18]Stewart EA, Gedroyc WM, Tempany CM, Quade BJ, Inbar Y, Ehrenstein T, Shushan A, Hindley JT, Goldin RD, David M, Sklair M, Rabinovici J: Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003, 189(1):48-54.
- [19]Voogt MJ, Trillaud H, Kim YS, Mali WP, Barkhausen J, Bartels LW, Deckers R, Frulio N, Rhim H, Lim HK, Eckey T, Nieminen HJ, Mougenot C, Keserci B, Soini J, Vaara T, Köhler MO, Sokka S, van den Bosch MA: Volumetric feedback ablation of uterine fibroids using magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Eur Radiol 2012, 22(2):411-417.
- [20]Liberman B, Gianfelice D, Inbar Y, Beck A, Rabin T, Shabshin N, Chander G, Hengst S, Pfeffer R, Chechick A, Hanannel A, Dogadkin O, Catane R: Pain palliation in patients with bone metastases using MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery: a multicenter study. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2009, 16(1):140-146. doi:10.1245/s10434-008-0011-2
- [21]Huisman M, van den Bosch MA: MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for noninvasive cancer treatment. Cancer Imaging 2011, 11:S161-S166. doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2011.9041
- [22]Catane R, Beck A, Inbar Y, Rabin T, Shabshin N, Hengst S, Pfeffer RM, Hanannel A, Dogadkin O, Liberman B, Kopelman D: MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for the palliation of pain in patients with bone metastases - preliminary clinical experience. Annals of Oncology 2007, 18(1):163-167. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl335
- [23]Gianfelice D, Gupta C, Kucharczyk W, Bret P, Havill D, Clemons M: Palliative treatment of painful bone metastases with MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound. Radiology 2008, 249(1):355-363. doi:10.1148/radiol.2491071523
- [24]Hurwitz MD, Ghanouni P, Kanaev SV, Iozeffi D, Gianfelice D, Fennessy FM, Kuten A, Meyer JE, LeBlang SD, Roberts A, Choi J, Larner JM, Napoli A, Turkevich VG, Inbar Y, Tempany CMC, Pfeffer RM: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for patients with painful bone metastases: phase III trial results. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014., 106(5) doi:10.1093/jnci/dju082
- [25]Kohler MO, Mougenot C, Quesson B, Enholm J, Le Bail B, Laurent C, Moonen CT, Ehnholm GJ: Volumetric HIFU ablation under 3D guidance of rapid MRI thermometry. Med Phys 2009, 36(8):3521-3535.
- [26]McDannold N, Clement GT, Black P, Jolesz F, Hynynen K: Transcranial magnetic resonance imaging- guided focused ultrasound surgery of brain tumors: initial findings in 3 patients. Neurosurgery 2010, 66(2):323-332. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000360379.95800.2F
- [27]Elias WJ, Huss D, Voss T, Loomba J, Khaled M, Zadicario E, Frysinger RC, Sperling SA, Wylie S, Monteith SJ, Druzgal J, Shah BB, Harrison M, Wintermark M: A pilot study of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor. N Engl J Med 2013, 369(7):640-648. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1300962
- [28]Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM: Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001, 94(2):149-158.
- [29]Kopelman D, Inbar Y, Hanannel A, Pfeffer RM, Dogadkin O, Freundlich D, Liberman B, Catane R: Magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound surgery. Ablation of soft tissue at bone-muscle interface in a porcine model. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 2008, 38(4):268-275. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.01931.x
- [30]Peters RD, Hinks RS, Henkelman RM: Ex vivo tissue-type independence in proton-resonance frequency shift MR thermometry. Magn Reson Med 1998, 40(3):454-459.
- [31]Sapareto SA, Dewey WC: Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1984, 10(6):787-800.
- [32]Ter Haar G: Principles of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound. In Interventional Oncology: A Practical Guide for the Interventional Radiologist. Edited by Mueller PR, Adams A. New York, USA: Springer Science + Business Media LLC; 2012:51-63.
- [33]Chow E, Hoskin P, Mitera G, Zeng L, Lutz S, Roos D, Hahn C, van der Linden Y, Hartsell W, Kumar E, International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party: Update of the international consensus on palliative radiotherapy endpoints for future clinical trials in bone metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012, 82(5):1730-1737. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.008
- [34]Chow E, Wu JS, Hoskin P, Coia LR, Bentzen SM, Blitzer PH: International consensus on palliative radiotherapy endpoints for future clinical trials in bone metastases. Radiother Oncol 2002, 64(3):275-280.
- [35]Napoli A, Anzidei M, Marincola BC, Brachetti G, Ciolina F, Cartocci G, Marsecano C, Zaccagna F, Marchetti L, Cortesi E, Catalano C: Primary pain palliation and local tumor control in bone metastases treated with magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound. Invest Radiol 2013, 48(6):351-358. doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e318285bbab
- [36]Kim YS, Park MJ, Keserci B, Nurmilaukas K, Kohler MO, Rhim H, Lim HK: Uterine fibroids: postsonication temperature decay rate enables prediction of therapeutic responses to MR imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation. Radiology 2014, 270(2):589-600. doi:10.1148/radiol.13130380
- [37]Rieke V, Butts PK: MR thermometry. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 27(2):376-390. doi:10.1002/jmri.21265
- [38]de Senneville BD, Mougenot C, Quesson B, Dragonu I, Grenier N, Moonen CT: MR thermometry for monitoring tumor ablation. Eur Radiol 2007, 17(9):2401-2410. doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0646-6
- [39]Schlesinger D, Benedict S, Diederich C, Gedroyc W, Klibanov A, Larner J: MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery, present and future. Med Phys 2013., 40(8) doi:10.1118/1.4811136
- [40]McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J, Collaboration B: Surgical innovation and Evaluation 3 no surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009, 374(9695):1105-1112.