期刊论文详细信息
Implementation Science
The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change
Kurt C Stange2  Russell E Glasgow1  David A Chambers3 
[1] Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA;Department of Family Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA;Division of Services and Intervention Research, National Institute of Mental Health, 6001 Executive Blvd, Rockville, MD, USA
关键词: Model;    Framework;    Implementation;    Dissemination;    Adaptation;    Maintenance;    Sustainability;   
Others  :  811088
DOI  :  10.1186/1748-5908-8-117
 received in 2013-04-02, accepted in 2013-09-20,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Despite growth in implementation research, limited scientific attention has focused on understanding and improving sustainability of health interventions. Models of sustainability have been evolving to reflect challenges in the fit between intervention and context.

Discussion

We examine the development of concepts of sustainability, and respond to two frequent assumptions —'voltage drop,’ whereby interventions are expected to yield lower benefits as they move from efficacy to effectiveness to implementation and sustainability, and 'program drift,’ whereby deviation from manualized protocols is assumed to decrease benefit. We posit that these assumptions limit opportunities to improve care, and instead argue for understanding the changing context of healthcare to continuously refine and improve interventions as they are sustained. Sustainability has evolved from being considered as the endgame of a translational research process to a suggested 'adaptation phase’ that integrates and institutionalizes interventions within local organizational and cultural contexts. These recent approaches locate sustainability in the implementation phase of knowledge transfer, but still do not address intervention improvement as a central theme. We propose a Dynamic Sustainability Framework that involves: continued learning and problem solving, ongoing adaptation of interventions with a primary focus on fit between interventions and multi-level contexts, and expectations for ongoing improvement as opposed to diminishing outcomes over time.

Summary

A Dynamic Sustainability Framework provides a foundation for research, policy and practice that supports development and testing of falsifiable hypotheses and continued learning to advance the implementation, transportability and impact of health services research.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Chambers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140709060224844.pdf 942KB PDF download
Figure 3. 63KB Image download
Figure 2. 81KB Image download
Figure 1. 49KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, et al.: Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004, 82(4):581-629.
  • [2]Glasgow RE, Chambers D, Developing Robust, Sustainable: Implementation systems using rigorous, rapid, and relevant science. Clin Transl Sci 2012, 5(1):48-55.
  • [3]Haines A, Kuruvilla S, Borchert M: Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. Bull World Health Organ 2004, 82(10):724-732.
  • [4]Flay BR: Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Prev Med 1986, 15:451-474.
  • [5]Greenwald P, Cullen JW: The new emphasis in cancer control. J Natl Cancer Inst 1985, 74:543-551.
  • [6]Stirman SW, Kimberly J, Cook N, et al.: The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implement Sci 2012, 7:17. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [7]Rounsaville BJ, Carroll KM, Onken LS: A stage model of behavioral therapies research: getting started and moving on from stage 1. Clin Psychol 2001, 8(2):133-142.
  • [8]Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C: National institutes of health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health 2012, 102(7):1274-1281.
  • [9]Rabin BA, Brownson RC, Haire J, Kreuter MW, Weaver NL: A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. Public Health Manag Pract 2008, 14(2):117-123.
  • [10]Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM: Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health 2011, 38:4-23.
  • [11]Kilbourne AM, Neumann MS, Pincus HA, et al.: Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: application of the replicating effective programs framework. Implement Sci 2007, 2:42. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [12]Weisz JR, Kazdin AE: Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents. New York: Guildford Press; 2010.
  • [13]Kessler R, Glasgow RE: A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med 2011, 40(6):637-644.
  • [14]Kaitin KI: Deconstructing the drug development process: the new face of innovation. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010, 87(3):356-361.
  • [15]Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al.: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ 2008, 337:a1655.
  • [16]Prochaska JO, Evers KE, Prochaska JM, et al.: Efficacy and effectiveness trials: examples from smoking cessation and bullying prevention. J Health Psychol 2007, 112(1):170-178.
  • [17]COMMIT Research Group: Community intervention trial for smoking cessation (COMMIT): summary of design and intervention. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991, 83:1620-1628.
  • [18]Cohen DJ, Crabtree BF, Etz RS, et al.: Fidelity versus flexibility: translating evidence-base research into practice. Am J Prev Med 2008, 35:S381-S389.
  • [19]Glisson C, Schoenwald SK, Hemmelgarn A, et al.: Randomized trial of MST and ARC in a two-level evidence-based treatment implementation strategy. J Consult Clin Psychol 2010, 78(4):537-550.
  • [20]Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK: Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health. New York: OUP; 2012.
  • [21]Chambers DA: Advancing sustainability research: challenging existing paradigms. Public Health Dent 2011, 1(71):S99-100.
  • [22]Shediac-Rizkallah MC, Bone LR: Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Educ Res 1998, 13(1):87-108.
  • [23]Scheirer MA: Is sustainability possible? A review and commentary on empirical studies of program sustainability. Am J Eval 2005, 26(3):320-347.
  • [24]Scheirer MA, Dearing JW: An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. Am J Public Health 2011, 101(11):2059-2067.
  • [25]DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW: The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 1983, 48(2):147-160.
  • [26]Ory MG, Lee SM, Mier N, et al.: The science of sustaining health behavior change: the health maintenance consortium. Am J Health Behav 2010, 34(6):647-659.
  • [27]Swerissen H, Crisp BC: The sustainability of health promotion interventions for different levels of social organization. Health Promot Interv 2004, 19(1):123-130.
  • [28]Greenhalgh J, Meadows K: The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. J Eval Clin Pract 1999, 5(4):401-416.
  • [29]Duckers ML, Wagner C, Vos L, et al.: Understanding organisational development, sustainability, and diffusion of innovations within hospitals participating in a multilevel quality collaborative. Implementation science 2011, 6(1):18. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [30]Glasgow RE, Green LW, Taylor M, et al.: An Evidence integration triangle for aligning science with policy and practice. Am J Prev Med 2012, 42(6):646-654.
  • [31]Wandersman A, Imm P, Chinman M, et al.: Getting to Outcomes: Methods and tools for planning, evaluation and accountability. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention; 1999.
  • [32]Estabrooks PA, Smith-Ray RL, Dzewaltoski DA, et al.: Sustainability of evidence-based community-based physical activity programs for older adults: lessons from Active for Life. Transl Behav Med 2011, 1(2):1-8.
  • [33]Wilson KD, Kurz RS: Bridging implementation and institutionalization within organizations: proposed employment of continuous quality improvement to further dissemination. J Public Health Manag Pract 2008, 14(2):109-116.
  • [34]McLaughlin CP, Kaluzny AD: Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2004.
  • [35]Homer JB, Hirsch GB: Systems dynamics modeling for public health: background and opportunities. Am J Public Health 2006, 96(3):452-458.
  • [36]Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T: The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ 2001, 323:625-628.
  • [37]Ebi K: Climate change and health risks: assessing and responding to them through 'adaptive management. Health Aff 2011, 30(5):924-30.
  • [38]Bushe GR, Marshak RJ: Revisioning organizational development: diagnostic and dialogic premises and patterns of practice. J Appl Behav Sci 2009, 45(3):348-368.
  • [39]Checkland P: Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Syst Res 2000, 17:S11-S58.
  • [40]Stange KC, Breslau ES, Dietrich AJ, et al.: State-of-the-art and future directions in multilevel interventions across the cancer control continuum. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2012, 44:20-31.
  • [41]Green LW: Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Fam Pract 2008, 25(Supp 1):i20-i24.
  • [42]Bughlin J, Chui M, Johnson B: The next step in open innovation. 2012. [The McKinsey Quarterly] http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/next_step_in_open_innovation_2155 webcite. Accessed
  • [43]Khoury MJ, Gwinn M, Glasgow RE, et al.: Am J Prev Med. 2012, 42(6):639-45.
  • [44]Etheredge LM: A rapid-learning health system: what would a rapid-learning health system look like, and how might we get there. Health Aff 2007. Web Exclusive Collection(26):w107-w118 (Published ahead of print January 26, 2007, doi:10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.w107
  • [45]Meissner HI, Vernon SW, Rimer BK, Wilson KM, Rakowski W, Briss PA, et al.: The future of research that promotes cancer screening. Cancer 2004, 101(5 Suppl):1251-9.
  • [46]Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC: Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science 2009, 4:50. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [47]Glasgow RE, Kaplan R, Ockene J, Society of Behavioral Medicine Health Policy Committee, et al.: Patient-reported measures of psychosocial issues and health behavior should be added to electronic health records. Health Affairs 2012, 31(3):497-504.
  • [48]Tanenbaum S: Evidence-based practice as mental health policy: three controversies and a caveat. Health Aff 2005, 24(1):163-173.
  • [49]Rabin BA, Purcell P, Naveed S, et al.: Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures. Implement Sci 2012, 7:119. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [50]Estabrooks P, Glasgow RE, Dzewaltowski DA: Physical activity promotion through primary care. JAMA 2003, 289(22):2913-2916.
  • [51]Rogers EM: Diffusion of Innovations (4th Edition). New York: Free Press; 1995.
  • [52]Senge PM, Kleiner A, Roberts C, et al.: The dance of change: The challenges of sustaining momentum in learning organizations. 1st edition. New York: Currency/Doubleday; 1999.
  • [53]Lorig KR, Holman HR: Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med 2003, 26:1-7.
  • [54]Institute of Medicine: A foundation for evidence-driven practice: A rapid learning system for cancer care. Workshop Summary. Washington, D.C: NAS Press; 2010.
  • [55]Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M: Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q 1996, 74:511-544.
  • [56]Unutzer J, Powers D, Katon W: From establishing an evidence-based practice to implementation in real-world settings: IMPACT as a case study. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2005, 28(4):1079-1092.
  • [57]Detmer D, Bloomrosen M, Raymond B, et al.: Integrated personal health records: Transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008, 8(45):1-14.
  • [58]PatientsLikeMe: PatientsLikeMe website. 2012. http://patientslikeme.com webcite. Accessed March 15, 2012
  • [59]Institute of Medicine: Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. Consensus Report. Washington, D.C: NAS Press; 2012.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:56次 浏览次数:38次